Softwr

Software · head to head

Akita vs Qwilr

Akita logo

Akita

Software

Customer Success Without the Complexity

From
$160/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Qwilr logo

Qwilr

Software

Beautiful Proposals and Quotes

From
$35/month
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • They diverge on capability: Akita covers Health scores, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Akita and Qwilr actually diverge.

Attributes where Akita and Qwilr differ
AttributeAkitaQwilr
Starting price$160/month$35/month
Founded20182014

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Akita

  • Health scores
  • Customer segments
  • Lifecycle stages
  • Alerts
  • Custom metrics
  • Intercom

Only in Qwilr

  • Web-based proposals
  • Interactive quotes
  • E-signatures
  • Analytics
  • Video embedding
  • Slack

Both cover

  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Stripe
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Akita

  • Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot Qwilr
  • Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot Qwilr
  • Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot Qwilr
  • Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot Qwilr
  • Task and workflow management for CSMsnot Qwilr

Qwilr

  • Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Akita

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Akita

  • Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
  • Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published

Qwilr

  • Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
  • QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale

Pricing, plan by plan

Akita

$160/month
  • Starter$160/month
    • Health scores
    • Basic integrations
    • Alerts
  • Professional$400/month
    • Unlimited integrations
    • Custom metrics
    • API

Qwilr

$35/month
  • Business$35/month
    • Unlimited documents
    • Templates
    • E-signatures
  • Enterprise$59/month
    • Custom branding
    • Advanced analytics
    • Integrations

Which should you pick?

Choose Akita if

  • You need health scores.
  • You also want customer segments.
Akita review

Choose Qwilr if

  • You need web-based proposals.
  • You also want interactive quotes.
Qwilr review

Questions people ask

Is Akita or Qwilr better?
Neither clearly leads. Akita starts at $160/month and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Akita or Qwilr?
Akita starts at $160/month and Qwilr at $35/month.
Does Akita or Qwilr run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Akita best used for?
Akita is most often used for centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team, building health scores to flag at-risk accounts, segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooks, identifying expansion revenue opportunities. Of those, centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team and building health scores to flag at-risk accounts are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
What can Akita do that Qwilr cannot?
Akita covers Health scores, Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Stripe, Web support.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Akita

More on Qwilr

Keep looking

Other head to heads