Software · head to head
Bigtincan vs Qwilr
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bigtincan no published pricing makes budgeting difficult and requires contacting sales for quotes; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- They diverge on capability: Bigtincan covers AI content recommendations, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bigtincan and Qwilr actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bigtincan
- AI content recommendations
- Mobile enablement
- Document automation
- Training
- Microsoft Dynamics
- SAP
- Oracle
- Ios support
Only in Qwilr
- Web-based proposals
- Interactive quotes
- E-signatures
- Video embedding
- HubSpot
- Slack
- Stripe
Both cover
- Analytics
- Salesforce
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bigtincan
- Customer Successnot Qwilr
- Sales Enablementnot Qwilr
- Ai Automationnot Qwilr
Qwilr
- Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Bigtincan
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bigtincan
- No published pricing makes budgeting difficult and requires contacting sales for quotes
- Steep implementation and onboarding costs on top of per-user fees for enterprise plans
- Complex setup process requiring significant organizational change management to adopt
Qwilr
- Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
- QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale
Pricing, plan by plan
Bigtincan
On request- SMB$null/custom
- Average cost $17,937
- Sales enablement basics
- Mobile access
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Average cost $139,644
- Advanced features
- Dedicated support
Qwilr
$35/month- Business$35/month
- Unlimited documents
- Templates
- E-signatures
- Enterprise$59/month
- Custom branding
- Advanced analytics
- Integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Bigtincan if
- You need ai content recommendations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want mobile enablement.
Questions people ask
- Is Bigtincan or Qwilr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bigtincan starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bigtincan or Qwilr?
- Bigtincan starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month.
- Does Bigtincan or Qwilr run on more platforms?
- Bigtincan runs on Web, iOS, Android. Qwilr runs on Web.
- What is Bigtincan best used for?
- Bigtincan is most often used for customer success, sales enablement, ai automation. Of those, customer success and sales enablement are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
- What can Bigtincan do that Qwilr cannot?
- Bigtincan covers AI content recommendations, Mobile enablement, Document automation, Training. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Video embedding. Both handle Analytics, Salesforce, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bigtincan: Does Bigtincan publish transparent pricing?
No. Bigtincan uses quote-based pricing with no published list prices. Most customers report effective costs of $25-$45 per user per month when billed annually, with SMB plans averaging $17,937 and Enterprise plans averaging $139,644.
SourceBigtincan: What is included in Bigtincan's mobile capabilities?
Bigtincan includes mobile access for sales teams to access content, run presentations, and engage customers on their devices as part of its mobile-first sales enablement approach.
SourceBigtincan: Does Bigtincan include AI-powered features?
Yes. Bigtincan includes AI-powered features for content recommendations, sales coaching, and engagement analytics to help teams optimize their selling process.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Bigtincan vs Allego
- Bigtincan vs Highspot
- Bigtincan vs Salesloft
- Bigtincan vs PandaDoc
- Bigtincan vs Brainshark
- Bigtincan vs DealHub
- Bigtincan vs DocuSign
- Bigtincan vs Proposify
- Bigtincan vs Showpad
- Bigtincan vs ZoomInfo
- Bigtincan vs DocuSign CLM
- Bigtincan vs Gainsight
- Bigtincan vs Mindtickle
- Bigtincan vs People.ai
- Bigtincan vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Bigtincan vs Webex
- Qwilr vs Allego
- Qwilr vs Highspot
- Qwilr vs Salesloft
- Qwilr vs PandaDoc
- Qwilr vs Brainshark
- Qwilr vs DealHub
- Qwilr vs DocuSign
- Qwilr vs Proposify
- Qwilr vs Showpad
- Qwilr vs ZoomInfo
- Qwilr vs DocuSign CLM
- Qwilr vs Gainsight
- Qwilr vs Mindtickle
- Qwilr vs People.ai
- Qwilr vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Qwilr vs Webex


