Software · head to head
Akita vs Catalyst
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial; Catalyst pricing is custom and not published, requiring sales contact
- They diverge on capability: Akita covers Health scores, Catalyst covers Health scoring.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akita and Catalyst actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akita
- Health scores
- Customer segments
- Lifecycle stages
- Alerts
- Custom metrics
- Intercom
- Stripe
Only in Catalyst
- Health scoring
- Playbooks
- Journey builder
- 360 customer view
- Revenue intelligence
- Slack
- Segment
Both cover
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akita
- Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot Catalyst
- Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot Catalyst
- Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot Catalyst
- Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot Catalyst
- Task and workflow management for CSMsnot Catalyst
Catalyst
- Customer Successnot Akita
- Csm Toolsnot Akita
- Automationnot Akita
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akita
- Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
- Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published
Catalyst
- Pricing is custom and not published, requiring sales contact
- Integration complexity for organizations with non-standard tech stacks
Pricing, plan by plan
Akita
$160/month- Starter$160/month
- Health scores
- Basic integrations
- Alerts
- Professional$400/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Custom metrics
- API
Catalyst
$500/month- Essential$500/month
- Health scores
- Automation
- Reporting
- Enterprise$1500/month
- Custom integrations
- Advanced analytics
- Dedicated support
Which should you pick?
Choose Catalyst if
- You need health scoring.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want playbooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Akita or Catalyst better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akita starts at $160/month and Catalyst at $500/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akita or Catalyst?
- Akita starts at $160/month and Catalyst at $500/month.
- Does Akita or Catalyst run on more platforms?
- Akita runs on Web. Catalyst runs on Web, Mobile.
- What is Akita best used for?
- Akita is most often used for centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team, building health scores to flag at-risk accounts, segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooks, identifying expansion revenue opportunities. Of those, centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team and building health scores to flag at-risk accounts are not what Catalyst is typically brought in for.
- What can Akita do that Catalyst cannot?
- Akita covers Health scores, Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts. Catalyst covers Health scoring, Playbooks, Journey builder, 360 customer view. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Catalyst: Is Catalyst still separate after the Totango merger?
Yes. Catalyst operates as a distinct product brand under Totango + Catalyst as of 2026, with both products running on the same roadmap. Catalyst maintains its user-friendly interface while integrating Totango's enterprise governance capabilities.
SourceCatalyst: Does Catalyst integrate with Salesforce?
Yes. Catalyst features strong Salesforce integration, allowing seamless data sync and workflow automation between the customer success platform and CRM.
SourceCatalyst: Who should use Catalyst?
Catalyst is designed for mid-market and enterprise B2B companies that want CS-led revenue motion with an intuitive interface focused on CSM day-to-day workflows rather than IT administration.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Akita vs Aviso
- Akita vs ChurnZero
- Akita vs Planhat
- Akita vs Custify
- Akita vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Akita vs SmartKarrot
- Akita vs Vitally
- Akita vs Amity
- Akita vs Apttus
- Akita vs Better Proposals
- Akita vs Chorus.ai
- Akita vs ClientPoint
- Akita vs ClientSuccess
- Akita vs Conga
- Akita vs Kapta
- Akita vs Lessonly
- Akita vs Natero
- Catalyst vs Aviso
- Catalyst vs ChurnZero
- Catalyst vs Planhat
- Catalyst vs Custify
- Catalyst vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Catalyst vs SmartKarrot
- Catalyst vs Vitally
- Catalyst vs Amity
- Catalyst vs Apttus
- Catalyst vs Better Proposals
- Catalyst vs Chorus.ai
- Catalyst vs ClientPoint
- Catalyst vs ClientSuccess
- Catalyst vs Conga
- Catalyst vs Kapta
- Catalyst vs Lessonly
- Catalyst vs Natero


