Softwr

Software · head to head

Amity vs Qwilr

Amity logo

Amity

Software

Customer Success for Growing Teams

From
$300/month
Rated
-
Qwilr logo

Qwilr

Software

Beautiful Proposals and Quotes

From
$35/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Amity amity Social Cloud is priced per Monthly Active User (MAU) rather than a flat seat fee, with tiers of $0.06/$0.09/$0.14 per MAU (USD) on Basic, Advanced and Max plans as archived in 2022, so cost scales directly with app usage rather than user count.; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • They diverge on capability: Amity covers Health scores, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Amity and Qwilr actually diverge.

Attributes where Amity and Qwilr differ
AttributeAmityQwilr
Starting price$300/month$35/month

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown), founded (2014).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Amity

  • Health scores
  • Customer segments
  • Playbooks
  • Task management
  • Alerts
  • Intercom

Only in Qwilr

  • Web-based proposals
  • Interactive quotes
  • E-signatures
  • Analytics
  • Video embedding
  • Stripe

Both cover

  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Slack
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Amity

  • Customer Successnot Qwilr
  • Smbnot Qwilr
  • Ease Of Usenot Qwilr

Qwilr

  • Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Amity

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Amity

  • Amity Social Cloud is priced per Monthly Active User (MAU) rather than a flat seat fee, with tiers of $0.06/$0.09/$0.14 per MAU (USD) on Basic, Advanced and Max plans as archived in 2022, so cost scales directly with app usage rather than user count.

Qwilr

  • Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
  • QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale

Pricing, plan by plan

Amity

$300/month
  • Starter$300/month
    • Health scores
    • Segments
    • Basic playbooks
  • Growth$600/month
    • Advanced automation
    • Custom reports
    • API

Qwilr

$35/month
  • Business$35/month
    • Unlimited documents
    • Templates
    • E-signatures
  • Enterprise$59/month
    • Custom branding
    • Advanced analytics
    • Integrations

Which should you pick?

Choose Amity if

  • You need health scores.
  • You also want customer segments.

Choose Qwilr if

  • You need web-based proposals.
  • You also want interactive quotes.

Questions people ask

Is Amity or Qwilr better?
Neither clearly leads. Amity starts at $300/month and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Amity or Qwilr?
Amity starts at $300/month and Qwilr at $35/month.
Does Amity or Qwilr run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Amity best used for?
Amity is most often used for customer success, smb, ease of use. Of those, customer success and smb are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
What can Amity do that Qwilr cannot?
Amity covers Health scores, Customer segments, Playbooks, Task management. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Web support.

Related pages

Other head to heads