Customer Success · head to head
Akita vs Clay
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial; Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- They diverge on capability: Akita covers Health scores, Clay covers Data enrichment.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akita and Clay actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akita
- Health scores
- Customer segments
- Lifecycle stages
- Alerts
- Custom metrics
- Intercom
- Stripe
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Zapier
- Slack
- GDPR
Both cover
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akita
- Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot Clay
- Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot Clay
- Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot Clay
- Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot Clay
- Task and workflow management for CSMsnot Clay
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Akita
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Akita
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akita
- Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
- Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Pricing, plan by plan
Akita
$160/month- Starter$160/month
- Health scores
- Basic integrations
- Alerts
- Professional$400/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Custom metrics
- API
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Akita or Clay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akita starts at $160/month and Clay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akita or Clay?
- Akita starts at $160/month and Clay at On request.
- Does Akita or Clay run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Akita best used for?
- Akita is most often used for centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team, building health scores to flag at-risk accounts, segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooks, identifying expansion revenue opportunities. Of those, centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team and building health scores to flag at-risk accounts are not what Clay is typically brought in for.
- What can Akita do that Clay cannot?
- Akita covers Health scores, Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts. Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akita vs Aviso
- Akita vs ChurnZero
- Akita vs Planhat
- Akita vs Catalyst
- Akita vs Custify
- Akita vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Akita vs SmartKarrot
- Akita vs Vitally
- Akita vs Amity
- Akita vs Apttus
- Akita vs Better Proposals
- Akita vs Chorus.ai
- Akita vs ClientPoint
- Akita vs ClientSuccess
- Akita vs Conga
- Akita vs Kapta
- Akita vs Lessonly
- Akita vs Natero
- Akita vs Outreach
- Akita vs Gong
- Akita vs Seismic
- Akita vs Pipedrive
- Akita vs HubSpot
- Akita vs Salesforce
- Akita vs Bitrix24
- Akita vs Capsule
- Akita vs Clari
- Akita vs Freshsales
- Akita vs Streak
- Akita vs Zoho CRM
- Akita vs Affinity
- Akita vs Agile CRM
- Akita vs Apollo.io
- Akita vs Capsule CRM
- Akita vs Clearbit
- Akita vs Cloze
- Clay vs Aviso
- Clay vs ChurnZero
- Clay vs Planhat
- Clay vs Catalyst
- Clay vs Custify
- Clay vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Clay vs SmartKarrot
- Clay vs Vitally
- Clay vs Amity
- Clay vs Apttus
- Clay vs Better Proposals
- Clay vs Chorus.ai
- Clay vs ClientPoint
- Clay vs ClientSuccess
- Clay vs Conga
- Clay vs Kapta
- Clay vs Lessonly
- Clay vs Natero
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze


