Customer Success · head to head
Akita vs Apollo.io
The short version
- Only Apollo.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial; Apollo.io everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set
- They diverge on capability: Akita covers Health scores, Apollo.io covers Contact database.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akita and Apollo.io actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akita
- Health scores
- Customer segments
- Lifecycle stages
- Alerts
- Custom metrics
- Intercom
- Stripe
Only in Apollo.io
- Contact database
- Email finder
- Lead search
- Automation
- Engagement tracking
- Reporting
- Outlook
- Gmail
Both cover
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akita
- Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot Apollo.io
- Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot Apollo.io
- Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot Apollo.io
- Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot Apollo.io
- Task and workflow management for CSMsnot Apollo.io
Apollo.io
- Lead generationnot Akita
- Prospect researchnot Akita
- Sales automationnot Akita
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akita
- Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
- Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published
Apollo.io
- Everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set
- Plans described as unlimited are capped in the fair use policy at 10,000 credits a month for non-paying accounts
- Connecting a mailbox that is not Gmail or Microsoft requires a paid plan
- How many records can be selected at once varies by tier
- Running out of credits means buying more rather than waiting for a reset
Pricing, plan by plan
Akita
$160/month- Starter$160/month
- Health scores
- Basic integrations
- Alerts
- Professional$400/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Custom metrics
- API
Apollo.io
Free- FreeFree
- Basic contact search
- Limited searches
- Starter$49/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- Email finder
- Professional$149/month
- Everything in Starter
- Automation
- Advanced analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo.io if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email finder.
Questions people ask
- Is Akita or Apollo.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akita starts at $160/month and Apollo.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akita or Apollo.io?
- Apollo.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $160/month for Akita and Free for Apollo.io.
- Does Akita or Apollo.io run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Apollo.io for free?
- Yes. Apollo.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akita starts at $160/month.
- What is Akita best used for?
- Akita is most often used for centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team, building health scores to flag at-risk accounts, segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooks, identifying expansion revenue opportunities. Of those, centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team and building health scores to flag at-risk accounts are not what Apollo.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Akita do that Apollo.io cannot?
- Akita covers Health scores, Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts. Apollo.io covers Contact database, Email finder, Lead search, Automation. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Web support.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akita vs Aviso
- Akita vs ChurnZero
- Akita vs Planhat
- Akita vs Catalyst
- Akita vs Custify
- Akita vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Akita vs SmartKarrot
- Akita vs Vitally
- Akita vs Amity
- Akita vs Apttus
- Akita vs Better Proposals
- Akita vs Chorus.ai
- Akita vs ClientPoint
- Akita vs ClientSuccess
- Akita vs Conga
- Akita vs Kapta
- Akita vs Lessonly
- Akita vs Natero
- Akita vs Outreach
- Akita vs Gong
- Akita vs Seismic
- Akita vs Pipedrive
- Akita vs HubSpot
- Akita vs Salesforce
- Akita vs Bitrix24
- Akita vs Capsule
- Akita vs Clari
- Akita vs Freshsales
- Akita vs Streak
- Akita vs Zoho CRM
- Akita vs Affinity
- Akita vs Agile CRM
- Akita vs Capsule CRM
- Akita vs Clay
- Akita vs Clearbit
- Akita vs Cloze
- Apollo.io vs Aviso
- Apollo.io vs ChurnZero
- Apollo.io vs Planhat
- Apollo.io vs Catalyst
- Apollo.io vs Custify
- Apollo.io vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Apollo.io vs SmartKarrot
- Apollo.io vs Vitally
- Apollo.io vs Amity
- Apollo.io vs Apttus
- Apollo.io vs Better Proposals
- Apollo.io vs Chorus.ai
- Apollo.io vs ClientPoint
- Apollo.io vs ClientSuccess
- Apollo.io vs Conga
- Apollo.io vs Kapta
- Apollo.io vs Lessonly
- Apollo.io vs Natero
- Apollo.io vs Outreach
- Apollo.io vs Gong
- Apollo.io vs Seismic
- Apollo.io vs Pipedrive
- Apollo.io vs HubSpot
- Apollo.io vs Salesforce
- Apollo.io vs Bitrix24
- Apollo.io vs Capsule
- Apollo.io vs Clari
- Apollo.io vs Freshsales
- Apollo.io vs Streak
- Apollo.io vs Zoho CRM
- Apollo.io vs Affinity
- Apollo.io vs Agile CRM
- Apollo.io vs Capsule CRM
- Apollo.io vs Clay
- Apollo.io vs Clearbit
- Apollo.io vs Cloze


