Software · head to head
Lusha vs Qwilr
The short version
- Only Lusha has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Lusha lusha prices its B2B contact database on a per-contact credit model, starting with a free plan and charging a per-contact cost for paid tiers rather than flat seat pricing, per the vendor's own pricing page meta description (archived, 2024).; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- They diverge on capability: Lusha covers Contact database, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Lusha and Qwilr actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Lusha
- Contact database
- Email search
- Company intelligence
- Email verification
- Chrome extension
- Integrations
- Gmail
Only in Qwilr
- Web-based proposals
- Interactive quotes
- E-signatures
- Analytics
- Video embedding
- Slack
- Stripe
Both cover
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Lusha
- Lead generationnot Qwilr
- Contact researchnot Qwilr
- Email verificationnot Qwilr
Qwilr
- Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Lusha
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Lusha
- Lusha prices its B2B contact database on a per-contact credit model, starting with a free plan and charging a per-contact cost for paid tiers rather than flat seat pricing, per the vendor's own pricing page meta description (archived, 2024).
Qwilr
- Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
- QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale
Pricing, plan by plan
Lusha
Free- FreeFree
- Limited searches
- Basic contact info
- Professional$99/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- Email verification
- Business$299/month
- Everything in Professional
- Advanced analytics
- API access
Qwilr
$35/month- Business$35/month
- Unlimited documents
- Templates
- E-signatures
- Enterprise$59/month
- Custom branding
- Advanced analytics
- Integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Lusha if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email search.
Questions people ask
- Is Lusha or Qwilr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Lusha starts at Free and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Lusha or Qwilr?
- Lusha has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Lusha and $35/month for Qwilr.
- Does Lusha or Qwilr run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Lusha for free?
- Yes. Lusha has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qwilr starts at $35/month.
- What is Lusha best used for?
- Lusha is most often used for lead generation, contact research, email verification. Of those, lead generation and contact research are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
- What can Lusha do that Qwilr cannot?
- Lusha covers Contact database, Email search, Company intelligence, Email verification. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Lusha vs Outreach
- Lusha vs Gong
- Lusha vs Seismic
- Lusha vs lemlist
- Lusha vs Reply.io
- Lusha vs Snov.io
- Lusha vs Woodpecker
- Lusha vs Apollo.io
- Lusha vs Bitrix24
- Lusha vs Capsule
- Lusha vs Clari
- Lusha vs Freshsales
- Lusha vs Streak
- Lusha vs UpLead
- Lusha vs Affinity
- Lusha vs Agile CRM
- Lusha vs Capsule CRM
- Lusha vs Clay
- Lusha vs Allego
- Lusha vs Highspot
- Lusha vs Salesloft
- Lusha vs PandaDoc
- Lusha vs Bigtincan
- Lusha vs ZoomInfo
- Lusha vs Brainshark
- Lusha vs DealHub
- Lusha vs DocuSign
- Lusha vs Proposify
- Lusha vs Showpad
- Lusha vs 6sense
- Lusha vs DocuSign CLM
- Lusha vs Gainsight
- Lusha vs Mailshake
- Lusha vs Mindtickle
- Lusha vs People.ai
- Lusha vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Qwilr vs Outreach
- Qwilr vs Gong
- Qwilr vs Seismic
- Qwilr vs lemlist
- Qwilr vs Reply.io
- Qwilr vs Snov.io
- Qwilr vs Woodpecker
- Qwilr vs Apollo.io
- Qwilr vs Bitrix24
- Qwilr vs Capsule
- Qwilr vs Clari
- Qwilr vs Freshsales
- Qwilr vs Streak
- Qwilr vs UpLead
- Qwilr vs Affinity
- Qwilr vs Agile CRM
- Qwilr vs Capsule CRM
- Qwilr vs Clay
- Qwilr vs Allego
- Qwilr vs Highspot
- Qwilr vs Salesloft
- Qwilr vs PandaDoc
- Qwilr vs Bigtincan
- Qwilr vs ZoomInfo
- Qwilr vs Brainshark
- Qwilr vs DealHub
- Qwilr vs DocuSign
- Qwilr vs Proposify
- Qwilr vs Showpad
- Qwilr vs 6sense
- Qwilr vs DocuSign CLM
- Qwilr vs Gainsight
- Qwilr vs Mailshake
- Qwilr vs Mindtickle
- Qwilr vs People.ai
- Qwilr vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud


