Software · head to head
Clay vs Qwilr
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and Qwilr actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Zapier
- GDPR
- Cloud deployment
Only in Qwilr
- Web-based proposals
- Interactive quotes
- E-signatures
- Analytics
- Video embedding
- Stripe
Both cover
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Slack
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Qwilr
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Qwilr
Qwilr
- Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Clay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Qwilr
- Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
- QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
Qwilr
$35/month- Business$35/month
- Unlimited documents
- Templates
- E-signatures
- Enterprise$59/month
- Custom branding
- Advanced analytics
- Integrations
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or Qwilr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or Qwilr?
- Clay starts at On request and Qwilr at $35/month.
- Does Clay or Qwilr run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that Qwilr cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze
- Clay vs Allego
- Clay vs Highspot
- Clay vs Salesloft
- Clay vs PandaDoc
- Clay vs Bigtincan
- Clay vs Brainshark
- Clay vs DealHub
- Clay vs DocuSign
- Clay vs Proposify
- Clay vs Showpad
- Clay vs ZoomInfo
- Clay vs DocuSign CLM
- Clay vs Gainsight
- Clay vs Mindtickle
- Clay vs People.ai
- Clay vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Clay vs Webex
- Qwilr vs Outreach
- Qwilr vs Gong
- Qwilr vs Seismic
- Qwilr vs Pipedrive
- Qwilr vs HubSpot
- Qwilr vs Salesforce
- Qwilr vs Bitrix24
- Qwilr vs Capsule
- Qwilr vs Clari
- Qwilr vs Freshsales
- Qwilr vs Streak
- Qwilr vs Zoho CRM
- Qwilr vs Affinity
- Qwilr vs Agile CRM
- Qwilr vs Apollo.io
- Qwilr vs Capsule CRM
- Qwilr vs Clearbit
- Qwilr vs Cloze
- Qwilr vs Allego
- Qwilr vs Highspot
- Qwilr vs Salesloft
- Qwilr vs PandaDoc
- Qwilr vs Bigtincan
- Qwilr vs Brainshark
- Qwilr vs DealHub
- Qwilr vs DocuSign
- Qwilr vs Proposify
- Qwilr vs Showpad
- Qwilr vs ZoomInfo
- Qwilr vs DocuSign CLM
- Qwilr vs Gainsight
- Qwilr vs Mindtickle
- Qwilr vs People.ai
- Qwilr vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Qwilr vs Webex


