CRM · head to head
Lusha vs Woodpecker

Woodpecker
CRM
Cold email and LinkedIn outreach automation platform with pay-per-use pricing
- From
- $7/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Lusha has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Lusha teams over 5 users must contact sales for configuration; no published per-user limits for standard plans; Woodpecker linkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- They diverge on capability: Lusha covers Contact database, Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Lusha and Woodpecker actually diverge.
| Attribute | Lusha | Woodpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | $7/month |
| Pricing model | freemium | usage-based |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web | web, api |
| Founded | 2016 | 2015 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (CRM).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Lusha
- Contact database
- Email search
- Company intelligence
- Chrome extension
- Integrations
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
Only in Woodpecker
- Cold email sequencing
- Deliverability warm-up
- Lead Finder
- Agency panel
- API and integrations
Both cover
- Email verification
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Lusha
- Lead generationnot Woodpecker
- Contact researchnot Woodpecker
- Email verificationnot Woodpecker
Woodpecker
- Running personalized one-to-one cold email campaignsnot Lusha
- Agencies managing outreach across multiple client accountsnot Lusha
- Verifying catch-all email addresses before sendingnot Lusha
- Adding LinkedIn outreach on top of an existing email campaignnot Lusha
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Lusha
- Teams over 5 users must contact sales for configuration; no published per-user limits for standard plans
- Unused credits on monthly plans roll over but cap at twice the monthly limit, creating potential waste
- Annual plans do not roll over unused credits; they reset at cycle end
Woodpecker
- LinkedIn outreach, extra warm-ups and API access are all separate paid add-ons rather than bundled features.
- Pay-per-contacted-prospect pricing can be harder to predict than flat per-seat plans at high volume.
- Exceeding the contacted-prospect limit halts new sends until the plan is topped up.
- Lacks the built-in calling/SMS channels that some multichannel competitors offer.
Pricing, plan by plan
Lusha
Free- FreeFree
- 40 credits per month
- Basic prospecting features
- Browser extension
- Starter$49.9/month
- 400 credits per month
- All Free plan features
- Professional$69.9/month
- 600 credits per month
- All Starter features
- Premium$399.9/month
- 3,400 credits per month
- All Professional features
Woodpecker
$7/month- Pay-per-use$7/month
- $7 per 100 contacted prospects
- Unlimited team members and email accounts
- 4 warm-ups monthly
Which should you pick?
Choose Lusha if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email search.
Choose Woodpecker if
- You need cold email sequencing.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want deliverability warm-up.
Questions people ask
- Is Lusha or Woodpecker better?
- Neither clearly leads. Lusha starts at Free and Woodpecker at $7/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Lusha or Woodpecker?
- Lusha has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Lusha and $7/month for Woodpecker.
- Does Lusha or Woodpecker run on more platforms?
- Lusha runs on Web. Woodpecker runs on web, api.
- Can I use Lusha for free?
- Yes. Lusha has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Woodpecker starts at $7/month.
- What is Lusha best used for?
- Lusha is most often used for lead generation, contact research, email verification. Of those, lead generation and contact research are not what Woodpecker is typically brought in for.
- What can Lusha do that Woodpecker cannot?
- Lusha covers Contact database, Email search, Company intelligence, Chrome extension. Woodpecker covers Cold email sequencing, Deliverability warm-up, Lead Finder, Agency panel. Both handle Email verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Lusha: What does Lusha's Free plan include?
Lusha's Free plan provides 40 credits per month at no cost. It includes basic prospecting features, browser extension access, and CRM integrations. Credits are used for email reveals (1 credit per contact) and phone numbers (10 credits per contact).
SourceWoodpecker: What does Woodpecker cost?
Woodpecker charges $7 per 100 contacted prospects per month (discounted heavily on annual billing), with add-ons like LinkedIn outreach at $29/month per account and extra warm-ups at $5/month each.
SourceLusha: How do Lusha credits work and what is the credit rollover policy?
Lusha uses a credit system where email reveals cost 1 credit and phone reveals cost 10 credits per contact. On monthly plans, unused credits roll over and accumulate up to twice your monthly credit limit. Annual plans reset unused credits at the cycle's end without rollover.
SourceWoodpecker: Is there a free plan, and what are its limits?
Woodpecker offers a 14-day free trial with full features, capped at 14 days or 100 emails sent, whichever comes first; the trial can be extended by contacting support.
SourceLusha: What is the annual pricing for Lusha plans?
Lusha offers annual pricing at a discount: Starter is $449.10/year (4,800 credits annually), Professional is $587.16/year (7,200 credits), and Premium is $3,119.21/year (40,800 credits). Annual plans are cheaper per credit than monthly but do not roll over unused credits.
SourceWoodpecker: How is usage metered?
Usage is metered by the number of prospects contacted per month; exceeding the plan's contacted-prospect limit halts new email sends, and exceeding the stored prospect limit prevents adding new leads.
SourceWoodpecker: What does Woodpecker integrate with?
Woodpecker integrates with Pipedrive, HubSpot, Zoho, Calendly, Zapier, Google Sheets, and offers an API, CLI, webhooks and an MCP server for custom workflows.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Lusha vs Seamless.AI
- Lusha vs Gong
- Lusha vs Outreach
- Lusha vs Pipedrive
- Lusha vs Seismic
- Lusha vs Clearbit
- Lusha vs UpLead
- Lusha vs Apollo.io
- Lusha vs Affinity
- Lusha vs Capsule CRM
- Lusha vs Cloze
- Lusha vs Daylite
- Lusha vs Solid Performers
- Lusha vs SuiteCRM
- Lusha vs Teamleader
- Lusha vs Twenty
- Lusha vs Clay
- Lusha vs LeadSquared
- Lusha vs lemlist
- Lusha vs Reply.io
- Lusha vs Hunter
- Lusha vs Snov.io
- Lusha vs Kylas
- Lusha vs OnePageCRM
- Lusha vs Apptivo
- Lusha vs EspoCRM
- Lusha vs Vtiger
- Lusha vs Bitrix24
- Lusha vs Less Annoying CRM
- Woodpecker vs Seamless.AI
- Woodpecker vs Gong
- Woodpecker vs Outreach
- Woodpecker vs Pipedrive
- Woodpecker vs Seismic
- Woodpecker vs Clearbit
- Woodpecker vs UpLead
- Woodpecker vs Apollo.io
- Woodpecker vs Affinity
- Woodpecker vs Capsule CRM
- Woodpecker vs Cloze
- Woodpecker vs Daylite
- Woodpecker vs Solid Performers
- Woodpecker vs SuiteCRM
- Woodpecker vs Teamleader
- Woodpecker vs Twenty
- Woodpecker vs Clay
- Woodpecker vs LeadSquared
- Woodpecker vs lemlist
- Woodpecker vs Reply.io
- Woodpecker vs Hunter
- Woodpecker vs Snov.io
- Woodpecker vs Kylas
- Woodpecker vs OnePageCRM
- Woodpecker vs Apptivo
- Woodpecker vs EspoCRM
- Woodpecker vs Vtiger
- Woodpecker vs Bitrix24
- Woodpecker vs Less Annoying CRM

