Software · head to head
Apollo.io vs Qwilr
The short version
- Only Apollo.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apollo.io everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- They diverge on capability: Apollo.io covers Contact database, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo.io and Qwilr actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo.io
- Contact database
- Email finder
- Lead search
- Automation
- Engagement tracking
- Reporting
- Outlook
- Gmail
Only in Qwilr
- Web-based proposals
- Interactive quotes
- E-signatures
- Analytics
- Video embedding
- Stripe
Both cover
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Slack
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo.io
- Lead generationnot Qwilr
- Prospect researchnot Qwilr
- Sales automationnot Qwilr
Qwilr
- Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Apollo.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo.io
- Everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set
- Plans described as unlimited are capped in the fair use policy at 10,000 credits a month for non-paying accounts
- Connecting a mailbox that is not Gmail or Microsoft requires a paid plan
- How many records can be selected at once varies by tier
- Running out of credits means buying more rather than waiting for a reset
Qwilr
- Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
- QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo.io
Free- FreeFree
- Basic contact search
- Limited searches
- Starter$49/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- Email finder
- Professional$149/month
- Everything in Starter
- Automation
- Advanced analytics
Qwilr
$35/month- Business$35/month
- Unlimited documents
- Templates
- E-signatures
- Enterprise$59/month
- Custom branding
- Advanced analytics
- Integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo.io if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email finder.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo.io or Qwilr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo.io starts at Free and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo.io or Qwilr?
- Apollo.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apollo.io and $35/month for Qwilr.
- Does Apollo.io or Qwilr run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Apollo.io for free?
- Yes. Apollo.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Qwilr starts at $35/month.
- What is Apollo.io best used for?
- Apollo.io is most often used for lead generation, prospect research, sales automation. Of those, lead generation and prospect research are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo.io do that Qwilr cannot?
- Apollo.io covers Contact database, Email finder, Lead search, Automation. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, E-signatures, Analytics. Both handle Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Apollo.io vs Outreach
- Apollo.io vs Gong
- Apollo.io vs Seismic
- Apollo.io vs Pipedrive
- Apollo.io vs HubSpot
- Apollo.io vs Salesforce
- Apollo.io vs Bitrix24
- Apollo.io vs Capsule
- Apollo.io vs Clari
- Apollo.io vs Freshsales
- Apollo.io vs Streak
- Apollo.io vs Zoho CRM
- Apollo.io vs Affinity
- Apollo.io vs Agile CRM
- Apollo.io vs Capsule CRM
- Apollo.io vs Clay
- Apollo.io vs Clearbit
- Apollo.io vs Cloze
- Apollo.io vs Allego
- Apollo.io vs Highspot
- Apollo.io vs Salesloft
- Apollo.io vs PandaDoc
- Apollo.io vs Bigtincan
- Apollo.io vs Brainshark
- Apollo.io vs DealHub
- Apollo.io vs DocuSign
- Apollo.io vs Proposify
- Apollo.io vs Showpad
- Apollo.io vs ZoomInfo
- Apollo.io vs DocuSign CLM
- Apollo.io vs Gainsight
- Apollo.io vs Mindtickle
- Apollo.io vs People.ai
- Apollo.io vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Apollo.io vs Webex
- Qwilr vs Outreach
- Qwilr vs Gong
- Qwilr vs Seismic
- Qwilr vs Pipedrive
- Qwilr vs HubSpot
- Qwilr vs Salesforce
- Qwilr vs Bitrix24
- Qwilr vs Capsule
- Qwilr vs Clari
- Qwilr vs Freshsales
- Qwilr vs Streak
- Qwilr vs Zoho CRM
- Qwilr vs Affinity
- Qwilr vs Agile CRM
- Qwilr vs Capsule CRM
- Qwilr vs Clay
- Qwilr vs Clearbit
- Qwilr vs Cloze
- Qwilr vs Allego
- Qwilr vs Highspot
- Qwilr vs Salesloft
- Qwilr vs PandaDoc
- Qwilr vs Bigtincan
- Qwilr vs Brainshark
- Qwilr vs DealHub
- Qwilr vs DocuSign
- Qwilr vs Proposify
- Qwilr vs Showpad
- Qwilr vs ZoomInfo
- Qwilr vs DocuSign CLM
- Qwilr vs Gainsight
- Qwilr vs Mindtickle
- Qwilr vs People.ai
- Qwilr vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Qwilr vs Webex


