Software · head to head
Akita vs Fathom Analytics
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Akita starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial; Fathom Analytics there is no free tier, only a 7 day trial
- They diverge on capability: Akita covers Health scores, Fathom Analytics covers Page view tracking.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akita and Fathom Analytics actually diverge.
| Attribute | Akita | Fathom Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $160/month | $14/month |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akita
- Health scores
- Customer segments
- Lifecycle stages
- Alerts
- Custom metrics
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Intercom
Only in Fathom Analytics
- Page view tracking
- Goal tracking
- Real-time analytics
- Referrer tracking
- Privacy-focused
- GDPR compliant
- Cloud deployment
- 20+ languages language support
Both cover
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akita
- Centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success teamnot Fathom Analytics
- Building health scores to flag at-risk accountsnot Fathom Analytics
- Segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooksnot Fathom Analytics
- Identifying expansion revenue opportunitiesnot Fathom Analytics
- Task and workflow management for CSMsnot Fathom Analytics
Fathom Analytics
- Privacy-focused web analytics without cookie bannersnot Akita
- A lightweight Google Analytics replacementnot Akita
- Tracking many sites from one accountnot Akita
- Long-term historical reporting while subscribednot Akita
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akita
- Starts at $49 a month with no free tier, only a 14 day trial
- Tier breakdown above the entry price is not published
Fathom Analytics
- There is no free tier, only a 7 day trial
- Priced on pageviews, from $45 a month at the 500,000 pageview level
- Custom events count against the pageview allowance rather than being tracked separately
- Site allowances come in packs, with additional 50-site packs at $10 a month
- Data is retained forever only while the subscription is active
Pricing, plan by plan
Akita
$160/month- Starter$160/month
- Health scores
- Basic integrations
- Alerts
- Professional$400/month
- Unlimited integrations
- Custom metrics
- API
Fathom Analytics
$14/month- Starter$14/month
- Unlimited page views
- 1 site
- Real-time analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Fathom Analytics if
- You need page view tracking.
- You also want goal tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Akita or Fathom Analytics better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akita starts at $160/month and Fathom Analytics at $14/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akita or Fathom Analytics?
- Akita starts at $160/month and Fathom Analytics at $14/month.
- Does Akita or Fathom Analytics run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Akita best used for?
- Akita is most often used for centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team, building health scores to flag at-risk accounts, segmenting customers and triggering automated playbooks, identifying expansion revenue opportunities. Of those, centralising customer data and product activity for a customer success team and building health scores to flag at-risk accounts are not what Fathom Analytics is typically brought in for.
- What can Akita do that Fathom Analytics cannot?
- Akita covers Health scores, Customer segments, Lifecycle stages, Alerts. Fathom Analytics covers Page view tracking, Goal tracking, Real-time analytics, Referrer tracking. Both handle Web support.
Related pages
More on Fathom Analytics
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Akita vs Aviso
- Akita vs ChurnZero
- Akita vs Planhat
- Akita vs Catalyst
- Akita vs Custify
- Akita vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Akita vs SmartKarrot
- Akita vs Vitally
- Akita vs Amity
- Akita vs Apttus
- Akita vs Better Proposals
- Akita vs Chorus.ai
- Akita vs ClientPoint
- Akita vs ClientSuccess
- Akita vs Conga
- Akita vs Kapta
- Akita vs Lessonly
- Akita vs Natero
- Akita vs Crazy Egg
- Akita vs Ruler Analytics
- Akita vs Northbeam
- Akita vs VWO
- Akita vs Attribution
- Akita vs Countly
- Akita vs Dreamdata
- Akita vs Google Analytics
- Akita vs Triple Whale
- Akita vs AB Tasty
- Akita vs Adobe Analytics
- Akita vs Adverity
- Akita vs Convert
- Akita vs Datorama
- Akita vs Funnel.io
- Akita vs Google Optimize
- Akita vs Improvado
- Akita vs June
- Fathom Analytics vs Aviso
- Fathom Analytics vs ChurnZero
- Fathom Analytics vs Planhat
- Fathom Analytics vs Catalyst
- Fathom Analytics vs Custify
- Fathom Analytics vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Fathom Analytics vs SmartKarrot
- Fathom Analytics vs Vitally
- Fathom Analytics vs Amity
- Fathom Analytics vs Apttus
- Fathom Analytics vs Better Proposals
- Fathom Analytics vs Chorus.ai
- Fathom Analytics vs ClientPoint
- Fathom Analytics vs ClientSuccess
- Fathom Analytics vs Conga
- Fathom Analytics vs Kapta
- Fathom Analytics vs Lessonly
- Fathom Analytics vs Natero
- Fathom Analytics vs Crazy Egg
- Fathom Analytics vs Ruler Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Northbeam
- Fathom Analytics vs VWO
- Fathom Analytics vs Attribution
- Fathom Analytics vs Countly
- Fathom Analytics vs Dreamdata
- Fathom Analytics vs Google Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Triple Whale
- Fathom Analytics vs AB Tasty
- Fathom Analytics vs Adobe Analytics
- Fathom Analytics vs Adverity
- Fathom Analytics vs Convert
- Fathom Analytics vs Datorama
- Fathom Analytics vs Funnel.io
- Fathom Analytics vs Google Optimize
- Fathom Analytics vs Improvado
- Fathom Analytics vs June


