CRM · head to head
Clay vs Reply.io

Reply.io
CRM
Multichannel sales engagement platform for email, LinkedIn, calls and SMS outreach
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Reply.io multichannel features and CRM sync require the higher-priced Professional tier or above.
- They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, Reply.io covers Multichannel sequences.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and Reply.io actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (subscription), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CRM).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Zapier
Only in Reply.io
- Multichannel sequences
- Contact database
- AI email assistant
- Deliverability tools
- CRM sync
- Reporting and analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Data enrichment and intelligencenot Reply.io
- Growth campaign automationnot Reply.io
- CRM workflow integrationnot Reply.io
Reply.io
- Running multichannel outbound sequences combining email and LinkedInnot Clay
- Automating cold calling and SMS follow-ups alongside emailnot Clay
- Finding new B2B prospects from a built-in contact databasenot Clay
- Syncing outreach activity into an existing CRMnot Clay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Reply.io
- Multichannel features and CRM sync require the higher-priced Professional tier or above.
- LinkedIn and calling/SMS automation are billed as separate per-account add-ons on top of plan pricing.
- Pricing is per user, which can raise costs quickly for larger sales teams.
- Monthly (non-annual) billing carries a notable price premium over the advertised annual rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
Free- FreeFree
- 500 actions per month
- 100 data credits per month
- Unlimited seats
- Launch$167/month
- 15000 actions per month
- 3000 data credits per month
- Phone enrichment
- Growth$446/month
- 40000 actions per month
- 6000 data credits per month
- CRM sync
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Unlimited capabilities across most features
- SSO
- Role-based access control
Reply.io
Free- FreeFree
- Limited monthly emails
- Basic sequence features
- Starter$49/month
- Email-only sequences
- Billed annually per user
- Professional$89/month
- Multichannel sequences
- CRM sync
- Billed annually per user
- Ultimate$139/month
- Full AI suite
- Highest sending limits
- Advanced reporting and integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Clay if
- You need data enrichment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want contact management.
Choose Reply.io if
- You need multichannel sequences.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want contact database.
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or Reply.io better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at Free and Reply.io at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or Reply.io?
- Clay starts at Free and Reply.io at Free.
- Does Clay or Reply.io run on more platforms?
- Clay runs on Web. Reply.io runs on web, api.
- Can I use Clay for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for data enrichment and intelligence, growth campaign automation, crm workflow integration. Of those, data enrichment and intelligence and growth campaign automation are not what Reply.io is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that Reply.io cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Reply.io covers Multichannel sequences, Contact database, AI email assistant, Deliverability tools.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clay: Can I use Clay for free?
Yes, Clay's free plan includes 500 actions and 100 data credits per month with unlimited seats and tables (200 rows max per table).
SourceClay: How much can I save with Clay's annual billing?
Clay offers significant annual discounts: Launch tier drops from $167/month to $54/month, and Growth tier drops from $446/month to $185/month when billed yearly.
SourceClay: What happens when I exceed my monthly actions or data credits on Clay?
Actions and data credits cost less than $0.01 each when purchased at scale, with unused data credits rolling over up to 2x monthly allocation on paid plans. Customers can bring their own API keys to avoid data credit costs.
SourceClay: Does the Growth plan limit the number of users or team members?
No, Clay's Growth plan supports unlimited seats with 40000 monthly actions, 6000 data credits, and CRM sync, designed for teams with CRM-based workflows and growth campaigns.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Folk
- Clay vs Krayin
- Clay vs Kylas
- Clay vs Ontraport
- Clay vs Really Simple Systems
- Clay vs Salesflare
- Clay vs Scratchpad
- Clay vs Seamless.AI
- Clay vs SharpSpring
- Clay vs Bigin
- Clay vs lemlist
- Clay vs Woodpecker
- Clay vs Snov.io
- Clay vs Hunter
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Mixmax
- Clay vs UpLead
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Solid Performers
- Reply.io vs Pipedrive
- Reply.io vs Gong
- Reply.io vs Outreach
- Reply.io vs Seismic
- Reply.io vs Salesforce
- Reply.io vs HubSpot
- Reply.io vs Zoho CRM
- Reply.io vs Freshsales
- Reply.io vs Folk
- Reply.io vs Krayin
- Reply.io vs Kylas
- Reply.io vs Ontraport
- Reply.io vs Really Simple Systems
- Reply.io vs Salesflare
- Reply.io vs Scratchpad
- Reply.io vs Seamless.AI
- Reply.io vs SharpSpring
- Reply.io vs Bigin
- Reply.io vs lemlist
- Reply.io vs Woodpecker
- Reply.io vs Snov.io
- Reply.io vs Hunter
- Reply.io vs Apollo.io
- Reply.io vs Mixmax
- Reply.io vs UpLead
- Reply.io vs Clari
- Reply.io vs Solid Performers

