Softwr

Software · head to head

Conga vs Qwilr

Conga logo

Conga

Software

Revenue Lifecycle Management

From
$50/month
Rated
-
Qwilr logo

Qwilr

Software

Beautiful Proposals and Quotes

From
$35/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Conga conga's pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no product list, and offers only a Get Conga Pricing enquiry button; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • They diverge on capability: Conga covers CPQ, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Conga and Qwilr actually diverge.

Attributes where Conga and Qwilr differ
AttributeCongaQwilr
Starting price$50/month$35/month
Founded20062014

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Conga

  • CPQ
  • Contract lifecycle management
  • Document generation
  • Workflow automation
  • Microsoft Dynamics
  • SAP
  • Oracle

Only in Qwilr

  • Web-based proposals
  • Interactive quotes
  • Analytics
  • Video embedding
  • HubSpot
  • Slack
  • Stripe

Both cover

  • E-signatures
  • Salesforce
  • Web support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Conga

  • Generating quotes, contracts and documents from CRM datanot Qwilr
  • Contract lifecycle management with approvals and e-signaturenot Qwilr
  • Configure price quote workflows for complex salesnot Qwilr

Qwilr

  • Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Conga

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Conga

  • Conga's pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no product list, and offers only a Get Conga Pricing enquiry button
  • Pricing is handled case by case through sales rather than through published tiers
  • Conga's CPQ product is now branded Advantage CPQ and is positioned as an integration on top of an existing CRM, so a Salesforce or equivalent CRM licence is required separately

Qwilr

  • Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
  • Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
  • QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale

Pricing, plan by plan

Conga

$50/month
  • Essentials$50/month
    • Document generation
    • E-signatures
    • Templates
  • Professional$100/month
    • CPQ
    • CLM
    • Workflow automation

Qwilr

$35/month
  • Business$35/month
    • Unlimited documents
    • Templates
    • E-signatures
  • Enterprise$59/month
    • Custom branding
    • Advanced analytics
    • Integrations

Which should you pick?

Choose Conga if

  • You need cpq.
  • You also want contract lifecycle management.

Choose Qwilr if

  • You need web-based proposals.
  • You also want interactive quotes.

Questions people ask

Is Conga or Qwilr better?
Neither clearly leads. Conga starts at $50/month and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Conga or Qwilr?
Conga starts at $50/month and Qwilr at $35/month.
Does Conga or Qwilr run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
What is Conga best used for?
Conga is most often used for generating quotes, contracts and documents from crm data, contract lifecycle management with approvals and e-signature, configure price quote workflows for complex sales. Of those, generating quotes, contracts and documents from crm data and contract lifecycle management with approvals and e-signature are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
What can Conga do that Qwilr cannot?
Conga covers CPQ, Contract lifecycle management, Document generation, Workflow automation. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, Analytics, Video embedding. Both handle E-signatures, Salesforce, Web support.

Related pages

Other head to heads