Software · head to head
Conga vs Qwilr
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Conga conga's pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no product list, and offers only a Get Conga Pricing enquiry button; Qwilr growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- They diverge on capability: Conga covers CPQ, Qwilr covers Web-based proposals.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Conga and Qwilr actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Conga
- CPQ
- Contract lifecycle management
- Document generation
- Workflow automation
- Microsoft Dynamics
- SAP
- Oracle
Only in Qwilr
- Web-based proposals
- Interactive quotes
- Analytics
- Video embedding
- HubSpot
- Slack
- Stripe
Both cover
- E-signatures
- Salesforce
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Conga
- Generating quotes, contracts and documents from CRM datanot Qwilr
- Contract lifecycle management with approvals and e-signaturenot Qwilr
- Configure price quote workflows for complex salesnot Qwilr
Qwilr
- Sales teams sending interactive proposals with embedded payment collection who can commit to annual billingnot Conga
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Conga
- Conga's pricing page publishes no rate, no plan tier and no product list, and offers only a Get Conga Pricing enquiry button
- Pricing is handled case by case through sales rather than through published tiers
- Conga's CPQ product is now branded Advantage CPQ and is positioned as an integration on top of an existing CRM, so a Salesforce or equivalent CRM licence is required separately
Qwilr
- Growth plan requires a minimum of 5 users at $55/user/month and Scale requires a minimum of 10 users at $75/user/month, both billed annually only
- Document automation beyond the free monthly allotment (10, 150 or 600 documents by tier) costs $5, $2.50 or $2.50 per additional document
- QwilrPay charges a payment processing fee on top of the subscription, ranging from 0.25% on Starter down to 0.05% on Scale
Pricing, plan by plan
Conga
$50/month- Essentials$50/month
- Document generation
- E-signatures
- Templates
- Professional$100/month
- CPQ
- CLM
- Workflow automation
Qwilr
$35/month- Business$35/month
- Unlimited documents
- Templates
- E-signatures
- Enterprise$59/month
- Custom branding
- Advanced analytics
- Integrations
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Conga or Qwilr better?
- Neither clearly leads. Conga starts at $50/month and Qwilr at $35/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Conga or Qwilr?
- Conga starts at $50/month and Qwilr at $35/month.
- Does Conga or Qwilr run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Conga best used for?
- Conga is most often used for generating quotes, contracts and documents from crm data, contract lifecycle management with approvals and e-signature, configure price quote workflows for complex sales. Of those, generating quotes, contracts and documents from crm data and contract lifecycle management with approvals and e-signature are not what Qwilr is typically brought in for.
- What can Conga do that Qwilr cannot?
- Conga covers CPQ, Contract lifecycle management, Document generation, Workflow automation. Qwilr covers Web-based proposals, Interactive quotes, Analytics, Video embedding. Both handle E-signatures, Salesforce, Web support.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Conga vs Aviso
- Conga vs ChurnZero
- Conga vs Planhat
- Conga vs Catalyst
- Conga vs Custify
- Conga vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Conga vs SmartKarrot
- Conga vs Vitally
- Conga vs Akita
- Conga vs Amity
- Conga vs Apttus
- Conga vs Better Proposals
- Conga vs Chorus.ai
- Conga vs ClientPoint
- Conga vs ClientSuccess
- Conga vs Kapta
- Conga vs Lessonly
- Conga vs Natero
- Conga vs Allego
- Conga vs Highspot
- Conga vs Salesloft
- Conga vs PandaDoc
- Conga vs Bigtincan
- Conga vs Brainshark
- Conga vs DealHub
- Conga vs DocuSign
- Conga vs Proposify
- Conga vs Showpad
- Conga vs ZoomInfo
- Conga vs DocuSign CLM
- Conga vs Gainsight
- Conga vs Mindtickle
- Conga vs People.ai
- Conga vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Conga vs Webex
- Qwilr vs Aviso
- Qwilr vs ChurnZero
- Qwilr vs Planhat
- Qwilr vs Catalyst
- Qwilr vs Custify
- Qwilr vs CustomerSuccessBox
- Qwilr vs SmartKarrot
- Qwilr vs Vitally
- Qwilr vs Akita
- Qwilr vs Amity
- Qwilr vs Apttus
- Qwilr vs Better Proposals
- Qwilr vs Chorus.ai
- Qwilr vs ClientPoint
- Qwilr vs ClientSuccess
- Qwilr vs Kapta
- Qwilr vs Lessonly
- Qwilr vs Natero
- Qwilr vs Allego
- Qwilr vs Highspot
- Qwilr vs Salesloft
- Qwilr vs PandaDoc
- Qwilr vs Bigtincan
- Qwilr vs Brainshark
- Qwilr vs DealHub
- Qwilr vs DocuSign
- Qwilr vs Proposify
- Qwilr vs Showpad
- Qwilr vs ZoomInfo
- Qwilr vs DocuSign CLM
- Qwilr vs Gainsight
- Qwilr vs Mindtickle
- Qwilr vs People.ai
- Qwilr vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Qwilr vs Webex


