CRM · head to head
Apollo.io vs Close

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Apollo.io has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Apollo.io everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set; Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- They diverge on capability: Apollo.io covers Contact database, Close covers Built-in calling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apollo.io and Close actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apollo.io
- Contact database
- Email finder
- Lead search
- Automation
- Engagement tracking
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Outlook
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Mobile app
- Zapier
Both cover
- Reporting
- Slack
- SOC2
- GDPR
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apollo.io
- Sales prospecting and lead generationnot Close
- Contact database management for sales teamsnot Close
- Email outreach and workflow automationnot Close
Close
- Inside salesnot Apollo.io
- Outbound salesnot Apollo.io
- Lead managementnot Apollo.io
- Sales engagementnot Apollo.io
- Pipeline trackingnot Apollo.io
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apollo.io
- Everything is metered in credits, and the free Starter plan runs on them too, so prospecting volume is capped rather than the feature set
- Plans described as unlimited are capped in the fair use policy at 10,000 credits a month for non-paying accounts
- Connecting a mailbox that is not Gmail or Microsoft requires a paid plan
- How many records can be selected at once varies by tier
- Running out of credits means buying more rather than waiting for a reset
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Pricing, plan by plan
Apollo.io
Free- FreeFree
- Basic contact search
- Limited searches
- Starter$49/month
- Everything in Free
- Advanced search
- Email finder
- Professional$149/month
- Everything in Starter
- Automation
- Advanced analytics
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Which should you pick?
Choose Apollo.io if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email finder.
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Apollo.io or Close better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apollo.io starts at Free and Close at $9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apollo.io or Close?
- Apollo.io has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Apollo.io and $9/month for Close.
- Does Apollo.io or Close run on more platforms?
- Apollo.io runs on Web. Close runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- Can I use Apollo.io for free?
- Yes. Apollo.io has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Apollo.io best used for?
- Apollo.io is most often used for sales prospecting and lead generation, contact database management for sales teams, email outreach and workflow automation. Of those, sales prospecting and lead generation and contact database management for sales teams are not what Close is typically brought in for.
- What can Apollo.io do that Close cannot?
- Apollo.io covers Contact database, Email finder, Lead search, Automation. Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Both handle Reporting, Slack, SOC2, GDPR.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apollo.io: Does Apollo offer a free plan?
Yes, Apollo offers a Starter plan that is free forever and includes unlimited email addresses for contacts. Gmail and Microsoft email account linking are available on the free plan with limited third-party email account linking.
SourceClose: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceApollo.io: How does Apollo's credit system work?
Apollo uses a credit-based system for exporting contact data outside the platform. Free and non-paying accounts have a monthly credit limit of 10,000 credits. Paid accounts receive limits based on their plan pricing, calculated as the lesser of annual commit divided by $0.025 or 1 million credits annually.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceApollo.io: How much do trial plans cost on Apollo?
Apollo trial plans include 50 credits and 5 mobile credits to test paid features at no charge. Trial versions do not support non-Gmail/Microsoft email account linking. Upgrades take effect immediately while downgrades take effect at the end of the billing cycle.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI
- Apollo.io vs Gong
- Apollo.io vs Outreach
- Apollo.io vs Pipedrive
- Apollo.io vs Seismic
- Apollo.io vs UpLead
- Apollo.io vs Reply.io
- Apollo.io vs Affinity
- Apollo.io vs Hunter
- Apollo.io vs lemlist
- Apollo.io vs Snov.io
- Apollo.io vs Woodpecker
- Apollo.io vs Folk
- Apollo.io vs Keap
- Apollo.io vs Krayin
- Apollo.io vs Kylas
- Apollo.io vs Mixmax
- Apollo.io vs Nimble
- Apollo.io vs Attio
- Apollo.io vs Drift
- Apollo.io vs Asana
- Apollo.io vs Docker
- Apollo.io vs Mozilla Firefox
- Apollo.io vs Userpilot
- Apollo.io vs Personetics
- Apollo.io vs Superhuman
- Apollo.io vs ClickUp
- Apollo.io vs Linear
- Apollo.io vs Notion
- Apollo.io vs Amplitude
- Apollo.io vs Eclipse
- Apollo.io vs Jenkins
- Apollo.io vs Lovable
- Apollo.io vs Miro
- Apollo.io vs Plane
- Close vs Seamless.AI
- Close vs Gong
- Close vs Outreach
- Close vs Pipedrive
- Close vs Seismic
- Close vs UpLead
- Close vs Reply.io
- Close vs Affinity
- Close vs Hunter
- Close vs lemlist
- Close vs Snov.io
- Close vs Woodpecker
- Close vs Folk
- Close vs Keap
- Close vs Krayin
- Close vs Kylas
- Close vs Mixmax
- Close vs Nimble
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Eclipse
- Close vs Jenkins
- Close vs Lovable
- Close vs Miro
- Close vs Plane

