CRM & Sales · head to head
Clay vs Close
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently; Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- They diverge on capability: Clay covers Data enrichment, Close covers Built-in calling.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clay and Close actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- English language support
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Both cover
- Zapier
- Slack
- GDPR
- Cloud deployment
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Close
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Close
Close
- Inside salesnot Clay
- Outbound salesnot Clay
- Lead managementnot Clay
- Sales engagementnot Clay
- Pipeline trackingnot Clay
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Pricing, plan by plan
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Questions people ask
- Is Clay or Close better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clay starts at On request and Close at $9/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clay or Close?
- Clay starts at On request and Close at $9/month.
- Does Clay or Close run on more platforms?
- Clay runs on Web. Close runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Clay best used for?
- Clay is most often used for enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table, building automated outbound research and outreach workflows. Of those, enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one table and building automated outbound research and outreach workflows are not what Close is typically brought in for.
- What can Clay do that Close cannot?
- Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Both handle Zapier, Slack, GDPR, Cloud deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze
- Clay vs Intercom
- Clay vs Mixpanel
- Clay vs Heap
- Clay vs Canny
- Clay vs Drift
- Clay vs Pendo
- Clay vs Userpilot
- Close vs Outreach
- Close vs Gong
- Close vs Seismic
- Close vs Pipedrive
- Close vs HubSpot
- Close vs Salesforce
- Close vs Bitrix24
- Close vs Capsule
- Close vs Clari
- Close vs Freshsales
- Close vs Streak
- Close vs Zoho CRM
- Close vs Affinity
- Close vs Agile CRM
- Close vs Apollo.io
- Close vs Capsule CRM
- Close vs Clearbit
- Close vs Cloze
- Close vs Intercom
- Close vs Mixpanel
- Close vs Heap
- Close vs Canny
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Pendo
- Close vs Userpilot


