Redlistvs
Limble CMMS


Limble CMMS: If you want published per-user pricing and a general CMMS without the lubrication specialism

Maintenance software built around lubrication programmes rather than bolting them on
As of 1 September 2026, Redlist's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. A CMMS whose starting point is lubrication: routes, lubricant identification, consumption tracking and oil analysis, with work orders arranged around them. Softwr lists it under Field Service. Redlist is available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
Redlist is maintenance and lubrication management software for heavy industry. Its lubrication module handles route planning, lubricant cross-referencing between brands, application quantities, contamination control and oil sample results, and links each of those to the asset and to the technician who performed the task. Around that sits a conventional CMMS: work orders, preventive maintenance schedules, parts, and a mobile app built for gloves and no signal. There is also a scheduling and dispatch side aimed at field service crews in construction and oilfield work. Lubrication is why it exists and why it gets shortlisted. Most CMMS products treat greasing as a preventive maintenance task with a checkbox, which loses the information that actually prevents bearing failure: which lubricant went in, how much, whether it was the right one, and what the oil analysis said. Redlist models that properly, including cross-referencing equivalent products from different suppliers, which is the practical problem when a site changes lubricant vendors. For a plant whose failure analysis keeps concluding lubrication, that is a specific and defensible reason to choose it over a general CMMS. Buyers are mining, aggregates, oilfield services, heavy construction and manufacturing operations in North America. The trade-offs are pricing opacity and breadth. Redlist does not publish rates; third-party sites report figures around 79 dollars per user per month at one seat, but the licence types differ in capability and the vendor quotes per organisation. And outside lubrication, the CMMS is competent rather than distinctive, so an organisation without a lubrication problem is paying for a specialism it will not use.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Redlist.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Limble CMMS: If you want published per-user pricing and a general CMMS without the lubrication specialism


UpKeep: If mobile-first work order management for a broad technician population is the main need


eMaint: If you need a configurable CMMS with an established enterprise integration record
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Redlist
On request
Capabilities
Lubrication routes
Planned greasing and oil change rounds sequenced by location with completion evidence
Lubricant cross-reference
Equivalent product matching across manufacturers when a supplier changes
Oil analysis integration
Laboratory sample results tied to the asset and trended over time
Role-based licences
Collect, Complete, Create and Connect user types with different capabilities
Offline mobile app
Field data capture in mines and remote sites without connectivity
Work order management
Preventive and corrective jobs with parts, labour and downtime capture
Scheduling and dispatch
Crew and equipment scheduling for field service operations
Contamination control
Tracking of filtration, breathers and cleanliness targets per lubricated point
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
No, it is a full CMMS with work orders and scheduling, but lubrication management is the reason most customers choose it.
Per user, across four licence types with different capabilities, rather than by asset count.
No. Figures circulating on review sites are not vendor-published and should not be used to set a budget.
Yes, the mobile app captures work offline and syncs later, which is the normal case in mining and oilfield sites.
Keep looking
Dutch enterprise asset management with role-based user tiers, now sold inside the IFS portfolio
Mobile-first maintenance and work order management for frontline teams
CMMS from CyberMetrics that still sells a perpetual on-premise licence alongside subscription
Cloud maintenance management with strong Spanish and Portuguese language support
CMMS with published per-user pricing plus vibration sensors sold as a separate per-asset subscription
Job management for commercial and residential trades with a four licence minimum
Field service management built around UK planned maintenance contracts and compliance certificates
CMMS and asset management for schools, local government, healthcare estates and manufacturing, now part of Siemens
Retail execution and shelf audit software for consumer goods field teams
Field service and online booking platform aimed at franchise and multi-location service brands
Field service management for locksmiths, garage doors and small trades with built-in phone tracking
Field service management with an API-first architecture and heavy integration surface
Service management for HVAC, plumbing and electrical contractors with deep QuickBooks Desktop sync
Dutch enterprise asset management with role-based user tiers, now sold inside the IFS portfolio
Cloud maintenance management with strong Spanish and Portuguese language support
Field service management built around UK planned maintenance contracts and compliance certificates
Field service management for locksmiths, garage doors and small trades with built-in phone tracking
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Redlist, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Drone-in-a-box inspection with the AIM software that runs the missions and reads the results
quoteCMMS with published per-user pricing plus vibration sensors sold as a separate per-asset subscription
Per user per monthDutch enterprise asset management with role-based user tiers, now sold inside the IFS portfolio
quoteCMMS from CyberMetrics that still sells a perpetual on-premise licence alongside subscription
quoteCMMS and asset management for schools, local government, healthcare estates and manufacturing, now part of Siemens
quoteJob management for Australian and New Zealand trade contractors, now part of the Simpro Group
quoteService management for HVAC, plumbing and electrical contractors with deep QuickBooks Desktop sync
quote