Marketing · head to head
Onclusive vs Wufoo

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Wufoo has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.; Wufoo free plan caps at 5 forms and 100 entries
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Onclusive and Wufoo actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
Only in Wufoo
Nothing recorded that Onclusive does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Wufoo
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Wufoo
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Wufoo
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Wufoo
Wufoo
- Event registration and attendee managementnot Onclusive
- Lead capture and sales qualificationnot Onclusive
- Customer feedback and survey collectionnot Onclusive
- Online order processing with payment collectionnot Onclusive
- Employee onboarding and registration workflowsnot Onclusive
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Wufoo
- Free plan caps at 5 forms and 100 entries
- Starter plan ($16.25/mo) still limits to 10 forms and 1,000 entries per month
- Accepting payments requires the Professional tier ($33.25/mo) or higher; Free and Starter tiers cannot take payments at all
Pricing, plan by plan
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Wufoo
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Wufoo review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Onclusive or Wufoo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Onclusive starts at On request and Wufoo at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Onclusive or Wufoo?
- Wufoo has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Onclusive and Free for Wufoo.
- Does Onclusive or Wufoo run on more platforms?
- Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Wufoo runs on Web.
- Can I use Wufoo for free?
- Yes. Wufoo has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Onclusive best used for?
- Onclusive is most often used for a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors, a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report, a pr agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one system, a corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal review. Of those, a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors and a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report are not what Wufoo is typically brought in for.
- What can Onclusive do that Wufoo cannot?
- Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Wufoo: What happens if I exceed my monthly entry limit?
On PAID accounts, if you exceed the number of entries allowed for the month, a fee of $0.05 USD per entry over the limit will be charged to your account at the end of your billing period.
SourceOnclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Wufoo: Are there file upload restrictions?
Maximum individual file size is 25MB per field and 100MB per form (on higher-tier plans). Storage is only available on paid accounts.
SourceOnclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Wufoo: What happens to free accounts that exceed limits?
On FREE accounts, forms will be deactivated once they have exceeded the maximum number of entries allowed for a given month.
SourceOnclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Wufoo: How many fields can I add to a form?
Approximately 100 fields max, though this depends on field type (paragraph fields are limited to 10 per form).
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Typeform
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Cognito Forms
- Onclusive vs Retool
- Onclusive vs Gravity Forms
- Onclusive vs GetFeedback
- Onclusive vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Onclusive vs QuestionPro
- Onclusive vs Jotform
- Onclusive vs Alchemer
- Onclusive vs Formstack
- Onclusive vs LimeSurvey
- Onclusive vs Medallia
- Onclusive vs Zonka Feedback
- Onclusive vs Google Forms
- Onclusive vs Microsoft Forms
- Onclusive vs Sogolytics
- Onclusive vs SurveyCTO
- Onclusive vs SurveyLegend
- Onclusive vs Tally
- Wufoo vs Roxhill
- Wufoo vs Northbeam
- Wufoo vs Buffer
- Wufoo vs Hootsuite
- Wufoo vs Bloomreach
- Wufoo vs Freshpaint
- Wufoo vs Umami
- Wufoo vs VWO
- Wufoo vs Moz
- Wufoo vs MoEngage
- Wufoo vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Wufoo vs Adverity
- Wufoo vs Typeform
- Wufoo vs Optimizely
- Wufoo vs Vimeo
- Wufoo vs Attribution
- Wufoo vs Countly
- Wufoo vs Cognito Forms
- Wufoo vs Retool
- Wufoo vs Gravity Forms
- Wufoo vs GetFeedback
- Wufoo vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Wufoo vs QuestionPro
- Wufoo vs Jotform
- Wufoo vs Alchemer
- Wufoo vs Formstack
- Wufoo vs LimeSurvey
- Wufoo vs Medallia
- Wufoo vs Zonka Feedback
- Wufoo vs Google Forms
- Wufoo vs Microsoft Forms
- Wufoo vs Sogolytics
- Wufoo vs SurveyCTO
- Wufoo vs SurveyLegend
- Wufoo vs Tally

