Marketing · head to head
Buffer vs Onclusive

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Buffer has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Buffer the free plan allows 3 connected channels and 10 scheduled posts per channel; Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- They diverge on capability: Buffer covers Post scheduling, Onclusive covers Global media monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Buffer and Onclusive actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Buffer
- Post scheduling
- Content calendar
- Analytics dashboard
- Link shortening
- Hashtag manager
- First comment
- Instagram Stories
- Shop Grid
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Buffer
- Social media schedulingnot Onclusive
- Content planningnot Onclusive
- Performance analyticsnot Onclusive
- Team collaborationnot Onclusive
- Client managementnot Onclusive
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Buffer
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Buffer
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Buffer
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Buffer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Buffer
- The free plan allows 3 connected channels and 10 scheduled posts per channel
- Essentials at $5 a month covers a single user; team members need the Team plan at $10 a month
- Approval workflows and custom permissions are Team tier only
- API access is rationed by plan, from 3,000 monthly requests on free to 15,000 on Team
- Content ideas are capped at 100 on the free plan
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Buffer
Free- FreeFree
- 3 connected accounts
- 10 scheduled posts per channel per month
- 100 content ideas
- Essentials$5/month
- Unlimited scheduled posts
- Per-channel pricing
- Advanced analytics
- Team$10/month
- Unlimited team members
- Unlimited scheduled posts
- Content approval workflows
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Which should you pick?
Choose Buffer if
- You need post scheduling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want content calendar.
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Buffer or Onclusive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Buffer starts at Free and Onclusive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Buffer or Onclusive?
- Buffer has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Buffer and On request for Onclusive.
- Does Buffer or Onclusive run on more platforms?
- Buffer runs on Web, iOS, Android. Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- Can I use Buffer for free?
- Yes. Buffer has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Buffer best used for?
- Buffer is most often used for social media scheduling, content planning, performance analytics, team collaboration. Of those, social media scheduling and content planning are not what Onclusive is typically brought in for.
- What can Buffer do that Onclusive cannot?
- Buffer covers Post scheduling, Content calendar, Analytics dashboard, Link shortening. Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Buffer: Does Buffer's free plan include all social media platforms?
The free plan supports 3 connected accounts across any of Buffer's 11 supported platforms (Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, YouTube, Threads, Pinterest, Google Business Profile, Bluesky, Mastodon) with up to 10 scheduled posts per channel per month.
SourceOnclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Buffer: Can I schedule Instagram Stories with Buffer?
No. Instagram Stories cannot be auto-published. Buffer sends a mobile notification to manually post stories, as Instagram does not provide an API for automated Story scheduling.
SourceOnclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Buffer: What is Buffer's per-channel pricing model?
Buffer charges per social media account (channel) rather than per user. Channels 1-10 cost standard rates ($5 Essentials or $10 Team), with additional channels beyond 10 discounted per channel.
SourceOnclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Buffer: Does Buffer have a mobile app and what platforms does it support?
Yes, Buffer offers iOS and Android apps for mobile management. The iOS app supports Mastodon and YouTube comment features, while Android support for these features is in development. Android community access works on the six most recent major Android versions.
SourceOnclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Buffer: What discount does Buffer offer for annual billing?
Buffer offers a 20% discount for annual billing across all paid plans, plus an additional 50% discount on paid plans for nonprofit organizations.
SourceBuffer: Can Buffer integrate with content creation and storage tools?
Yes. Buffer integrates with 24 tools including Canva, Google Drive, Dropbox, Unsplash for media, Zapier and Make for automation, WordPress for publishing, and Claude, ChatGPT, and Perplexity for AI-assisted content creation.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Buffer vs Hootsuite
- Buffer vs MoEngage
- Buffer vs Instapage
- Buffer vs Leadpages
- Buffer vs Iterable
- Buffer vs Customer.io
- Buffer vs Mailgun
- Buffer vs Postmark
- Buffer vs Unbounce
- Buffer vs Moz
- Buffer vs Vimeo
- Buffer vs Ahrefs
- Buffer vs Improvado
- Buffer vs Insider
- Buffer vs Invoca
- Buffer vs June
- Buffer vs Kissmetrics
- Buffer vs Roxhill
- Buffer vs Northbeam
- Buffer vs Bloomreach
- Buffer vs Freshpaint
- Buffer vs Umami
- Buffer vs VWO
- Buffer vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Buffer vs Adverity
- Buffer vs Whatagraph
- Buffer vs Optimizely
- Buffer vs Attribution
- Buffer vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Instapage
- Onclusive vs Leadpages
- Onclusive vs Iterable
- Onclusive vs Customer.io
- Onclusive vs Mailgun
- Onclusive vs Postmark
- Onclusive vs Unbounce
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Ahrefs
- Onclusive vs Improvado
- Onclusive vs Insider
- Onclusive vs Invoca
- Onclusive vs June
- Onclusive vs Kissmetrics
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly

