Marketing · head to head
Northbeam vs Onclusive

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Northbeam limited creative-level reporting focused on campaign and ad set rather than individual ad performance; Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- They diverge on capability: Northbeam covers Cross-platform attribution, Onclusive covers Global media monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Northbeam and Onclusive actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Northbeam
- Cross-platform attribution
- Media mix modeling
- Creative analytics
- Real-time dashboards
- Incrementality testing
- Customer journey
- Cohort analysis
- LTV predictions
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Northbeam
- Marketing attributionnot Onclusive
- Media optimizationnot Onclusive
- Creative testingnot Onclusive
- Budget allocationnot Onclusive
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Northbeam
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Northbeam
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Northbeam
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Northbeam
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Northbeam
- Limited creative-level reporting focused on campaign and ad set rather than individual ad performance
- Lack of transparency in attribution modeling methodology and how credit is assigned
- Pageview-based pricing that can scale faster than perceived value for high-traffic, lower-conversion brands
- Slower reporting cadence limits real-time feedback for teams requiring immediate performance data
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Northbeam
$1500/month- Starter$1500/month
- Multi-touch attribution
- Media mix modeling
- Up to 1M monthly pageviews
- Professional$2500/month
- All Starter features
- Creative analytics
- Export API access
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Which should you pick?
Choose Northbeam if
- You need cross-platform attribution.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want media mix modeling.
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Northbeam or Onclusive better?
- Neither clearly leads. Northbeam starts at $1500/month and Onclusive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Northbeam or Onclusive?
- Northbeam starts at $1500/month and Onclusive at On request.
- Does Northbeam or Onclusive run on more platforms?
- Northbeam runs on Web, API. Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Northbeam best used for?
- Northbeam is most often used for marketing attribution, media optimization, creative testing, budget allocation. Of those, marketing attribution and media optimization are not what Onclusive is typically brought in for.
- What can Northbeam do that Onclusive cannot?
- Northbeam covers Cross-platform attribution, Media mix modeling, Creative analytics, Real-time dashboards. Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Northbeam: How is Northbeam priced?
Northbeam offers three tiers: Starter ($1,500/month), Professional ($2,500/month), and Enterprise (custom quote). Pricing is based on monthly pageviews and refreshed data frequency. There are no setup fees, free plan, or free trial.
SourceOnclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Northbeam: What platforms does Northbeam integrate with?
Northbeam integrates with Shopify, Meta Ads, Google Ads, TikTok, Pinterest, Snapchat, YouTube, Klaviyo, Recharge, and others. It pushes attribution data to Meta CAPI, Google Conversion API, GA4, and TikTok Events API.
SourceOnclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Northbeam: What does Northbeam measure?
Northbeam uses multi-touch attribution (MTA), media mix modeling (MMM), and Northbeam Apex to measure how paid media spend translates to revenue. Apex sends attribution data directly back to ad platforms for algorithm optimization.
SourceOnclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Northbeam: Who should use Northbeam?
Northbeam is ideal for intermediate to advanced ecommerce operators at Shopify-based DTC brands generating $1M+ annual revenue and spending at least $1.5M yearly on paid media across multiple channels.
SourceOnclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Northbeam: What are Northbeam's main limitations?
Key limitations include a steep learning curve and complex interface, shallow creative-level reporting, lack of model transparency, pricing that can scale faster than value for high-traffic brands, and slower reporting cadence compared to real-time dashboards.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Northbeam vs Triple Whale
- Northbeam vs Attribution
- Northbeam vs Marketing Evolution
- Northbeam vs Ruler Analytics
- Northbeam vs Adobe Analytics
- Northbeam vs Adverity
- Northbeam vs Kissmetrics
- Northbeam vs Woopra
- Northbeam vs VWO
- Northbeam vs Whatagraph
- Northbeam vs Optimizely
- Northbeam vs Countly
- Northbeam vs CleverTap
- Northbeam vs Convert
- Northbeam vs Datorama
- Northbeam vs Freshpaint
- Northbeam vs Funnel.io
- Northbeam vs Google Optimize
- Northbeam vs Roxhill
- Northbeam vs Buffer
- Northbeam vs Hootsuite
- Northbeam vs Bloomreach
- Northbeam vs Umami
- Northbeam vs Moz
- Northbeam vs MoEngage
- Northbeam vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Northbeam vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Triple Whale
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Marketing Evolution
- Onclusive vs Ruler Analytics
- Onclusive vs Adobe Analytics
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Kissmetrics
- Onclusive vs Woopra
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Countly
- Onclusive vs CleverTap
- Onclusive vs Convert
- Onclusive vs Datorama
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Funnel.io
- Onclusive vs Google Optimize
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Vimeo

