Marketing · head to head
Onclusive vs SurveyCTO

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

SurveyCTO
Surveys
Offline field survey platform priced by submissions rather than seats, built for research data quality
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only SurveyCTO has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.; SurveyCTO pricing is by submission volume, forms and storage rather than by users, so a small team running continuous high-volume collection can pay more than a 200-person survey team that runs for six weeks
- They diverge on capability: Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, SurveyCTO covers Offline collection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Onclusive and SurveyCTO actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
Only in SurveyCTO
- Offline collection
- XLSForm authoring
- Automated quality checks
- Audio auditing
- Case management
- Random assignment
- Server region selection
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot SurveyCTO
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot SurveyCTO
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot SurveyCTO
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot SurveyCTO
SurveyCTO
- A household survey with 200 enumerators across a country where paying per seat would cost more than the fieldworknot Onclusive
- An impact evaluation that needs audio auditing and timing metadata to prove interviews were conducted as reportednot Onclusive
- A panel study revisiting the same households annually and needing offline case assignment to find them againnot Onclusive
- A statistics unit that must keep data inside a specific region and produce a SOC 2 report for its fundernot Onclusive
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
SurveyCTO
- Pricing is by submission volume, forms and storage rather than by users, so a small team running continuous high-volume collection can pay more than a 200-person survey team that runs for six weeks
- Forms are authored in XLSForm spreadsheet syntax, which is precise and versionable but has a real learning curve, and organisations without someone comfortable in it stall at form design
- Overage is charged at 100 US dollars per 1,000 extra submissions, which is easy to trigger on the Basic tier at 5,000 a month and produces surprise invoices during an active field round
- Server region selection only appears on the Pro tier and a custom GDPR data processing agreement only on Advanced, so European data protection requirements push the price to at least 315 and often 630 dollars a month regardless of volume
- It is built for structured research fieldwork, not for business process forms, so it has no dispatch, no invoicing and no formatted document output, and a field service business would be buying the wrong tool
Pricing, plan by plan
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
SurveyCTO
Free- CommunityFree
- Permanent free subscription for testing and training
- 10 forms
- 200 monthly submissions
- Basic$225/month
- Billed annually, 250 USD month to month
- 100 forms
- 10 GB storage
- Pro$315/month
- Billed annually, 350 USD month to month
- 500 forms
- 25 GB storage
- Advanced$630/month
- Billed annually, 700 USD month to month
- Unlimited forms, storage and submissions
- Advanced offline case management
Which should you pick?
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Choose SurveyCTO if
- You need offline collection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Android, iOS.
- You also want xlsform authoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Onclusive or SurveyCTO better?
- Neither clearly leads. Onclusive starts at On request and SurveyCTO at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Onclusive or SurveyCTO?
- SurveyCTO has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Onclusive and Free for SurveyCTO.
- Does Onclusive or SurveyCTO run on more platforms?
- Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. SurveyCTO runs on Web, Android, iOS.
- Can I use SurveyCTO for free?
- Yes. SurveyCTO has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Onclusive best used for?
- Onclusive is most often used for a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors, a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report, a pr agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one system, a corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal review. Of those, a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors and a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report are not what SurveyCTO is typically brought in for.
- What can Onclusive do that SurveyCTO cannot?
- Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database. SurveyCTO covers Offline collection, XLSForm authoring, Automated quality checks, Audio auditing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
SurveyCTO: Do I pay per enumerator?
No. Users and devices are unlimited on every paid tier. You pay for monthly submissions, forms and storage.
Onclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
SurveyCTO: Is there a free version?
Yes, a permanent community subscription with 10 forms, 200 monthly submissions and 200 MB of storage, intended for testing and training rather than production.
Onclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
SurveyCTO: What happens if I exceed my submissions?
Extra credits are 100 US dollars per 1,000, with discounts of 20 per cent or more at volume. Plan the tier around your peak field month, not your average.
Onclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
SurveyCTO: Can I choose where the data is stored?
Only on Pro and above. If data residency matters, budget for at least the Pro tier.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs Umami
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Typeform
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Jotform
- Onclusive vs KoboToolbox
- Onclusive vs Tally
- Onclusive vs Zonka Feedback
- Onclusive vs Device Magic
- Onclusive vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- Onclusive vs Fillout
- Onclusive vs Sogolytics
- Onclusive vs Medallia
- Onclusive vs QuestionPro
- Onclusive vs Retool
- Onclusive vs Cognito Forms
- Onclusive vs Google Forms
- Onclusive vs Microsoft Forms
- Onclusive vs SurveyLegend
- Onclusive vs Wufoo
- SurveyCTO vs Roxhill
- SurveyCTO vs Northbeam
- SurveyCTO vs Buffer
- SurveyCTO vs Hootsuite
- SurveyCTO vs Bloomreach
- SurveyCTO vs Freshpaint
- SurveyCTO vs Umami
- SurveyCTO vs VWO
- SurveyCTO vs Moz
- SurveyCTO vs MoEngage
- SurveyCTO vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- SurveyCTO vs Adverity
- SurveyCTO vs Typeform
- SurveyCTO vs Optimizely
- SurveyCTO vs Vimeo
- SurveyCTO vs Attribution
- SurveyCTO vs Countly
- SurveyCTO vs Jotform
- SurveyCTO vs KoboToolbox
- SurveyCTO vs Tally
- SurveyCTO vs Zonka Feedback
- SurveyCTO vs Device Magic
- SurveyCTO vs Qualtrics CoreXM
- SurveyCTO vs Fillout
- SurveyCTO vs Sogolytics
- SurveyCTO vs Medallia
- SurveyCTO vs QuestionPro
- SurveyCTO vs Retool
- SurveyCTO vs Cognito Forms
- SurveyCTO vs Google Forms
- SurveyCTO vs Microsoft Forms
- SurveyCTO vs SurveyLegend
- SurveyCTO vs Wufoo
