Marketing · head to head
Onclusive vs Umami

Onclusive
Marketing
Media monitoring, journalist database and PR measurement assembled from six acquired companies
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Umami
Marketing
Open source, cookie-free web analytics you can self-host for the cost of a database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Umami has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Onclusive onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.; Umami there is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- They diverge on capability: Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Umami covers Cookie-free tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Onclusive and Umami actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Marketing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Onclusive
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast monitoring
- Social listening
- Media contacts database
- Newsroom and press office
- Sentiment and tone analysis
- Share of voice reporting
- Crisis detection
Only in Umami
- Cookie-free tracking
- Self-hosting
- Small tracking script
- Custom events
- Funnels and goals
- Multi-site and teams
- Public dashboards
- API access
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Onclusive
- A multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendorsnot Umami
- A public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board reportnot Umami
- A PR agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one systemnot Umami
- A corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal reviewnot Umami
Umami
- A developer who wants traffic numbers on a personal or client site without adding a consent bannernot Onclusive
- An organisation whose legal or procurement team has ruled out sending visitor data to a US advertising companynot Onclusive
- A high-traffic site where hosted analytics priced by pageview band has become expensive and self-hosting removes the ceiling entirelynot Onclusive
- A team that wants analytics data in a database they already control so they can query and join it themselvesnot Onclusive
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Onclusive
- Onclusive was assembled from at least six acquired companies inside about a year, and users still encounter different interfaces, inconsistent data definitions and separate support paths depending on which module they are in, so training and internal reporting are harder than a single-product vendor.
- Pricing is not published and is scoped by market coverage, source count and user seats, which makes competitive benchmarking difficult and means renewal increases are hard to challenge without a parallel quote from Cision or Meltwater.
- Broadcast monitoring coverage is uneven by country, so a global contract can look complete on paper while a specific market you care about has thin local radio or regional television coverage; verify your priority markets by name before signing.
- The company carries private-equity ownership and acquisition-related debt financing, which historically in this category has meant pressure on support headcount and above-inflation renewal pricing rather than product investment.
- Automated sentiment classification on news copy remains error-prone, especially for irony, quoted criticism and industry jargon, so teams reporting sentiment to executives generally need a human review step that erodes the labour saving the tool was bought for.
Umami
- There is no cohort analysis, retention curve, session replay or multi-touch attribution, so a marketing team that needs to justify channel spend will still buy a second tool and Umami becomes a supplementary dashboard.
- Self-hosting is only free in licence terms; you own the database, the upgrades, the backups and the query performance at scale, and a busy site's events table grows quickly enough to need real attention.
- Because it stores no persistent identifier, it cannot follow a user across devices or sessions in any meaningful way, which makes returning-visitor and lifetime-value questions unanswerable by design rather than by omission.
- Cloud overage is billed per event beyond the plan allowance, so a traffic spike or a badly instrumented custom event can produce a bill materially above the $20 or $200 headline before anyone notices.
- It is maintained by a small team, so the pace of new capability is modest and enterprise expectations such as SSO, granular role permissions and formal support agreements are limited compared with commercial analytics vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Onclusive
On request- Onclusive$undefined/year
- Global media monitoring
- Broadcast and print coverage
- Onclusive Social listening
Umami
Free- Self-hostedFree
- MIT licensed, no licence fee
- No event limit imposed by the software
- Unlimited websites and users
- Cloud HobbyFree
- Up to 100,000 events per month
- 3 websites
- 6 months data retention
- Cloud Pro$20/month
- Up to 1,000,000 events per month
- Unlimited websites
- Unlimited team members
- Cloud Business$200/month
- Up to 10,000,000 events per month
- All Pro features
- Higher volume overage rate
Which should you pick?
Choose Onclusive if
- You need global media monitoring.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want broadcast monitoring.
Choose Umami if
- You need cookie-free tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Linux.
- You also want self-hosting.
Questions people ask
- Is Onclusive or Umami better?
- Neither clearly leads. Onclusive starts at On request and Umami at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Onclusive or Umami?
- Umami has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Onclusive and Free for Umami.
- Does Onclusive or Umami run on more platforms?
- Onclusive runs on Web, iOS, Android, API. Umami runs on Web, Linux.
- Can I use Umami for free?
- Yes. Umami has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Onclusive starts at On request.
- What is Onclusive best used for?
- Onclusive is most often used for a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors, a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report, a pr agency running press office and media enquiry workflow for several client brands from one system, a corporate affairs function that needs early warning on a coverage spike outside its own time zone, with broadcast clips retrievable for legal review. Of those, a multinational communications team that needs print, broadcast and online coverage across twenty markets reported in one dashboard rather than through three regional vendors and a public affairs team that must evidence share of voice against named competitors for a quarterly board report are not what Umami is typically brought in for.
- What can Onclusive do that Umami cannot?
- Onclusive covers Global media monitoring, Broadcast monitoring, Social listening, Media contacts database. Umami covers Cookie-free tracking, Self-hosting, Small tracking script, Custom events.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Onclusive: Is Onclusive one product or several?
Several. It was formed from Kantar Reputation Intelligence, PRgloo and the original Onclusive in January 2022, then absorbed Critical Mention and Digimind later that year, and the modules retain distinguishable lineages.
Umami: Is Umami really free?
Self-hosted, yes; it is MIT licensed with no event cap. You pay for the server and database. Umami Cloud has a free tier at 100,000 events a month and paid tiers from $20.
Onclusive: Who owns it?
Symphony Technology Group, a US private equity firm, with debt financing on the Critical Mention acquisition from Stellus Capital Management.
Umami: Do I need a cookie consent banner?
For Umami analytics specifically, generally no, because it sets no cookies and stores no personal data. Other tags on your site may still require one.
Onclusive: What happened to Digimind?
Digimind was acquired in July 2022 and rebranded as Onclusive Social in October 2022. If social listening is your main requirement, that is the platform you are evaluating.
Umami: Can it replace Google Analytics?
For traffic, referrers and event counts, yes. For attribution modelling, audiences and advertising integration, no.
Onclusive: Does it publish pricing?
No. Contracts are annual and quoted according to markets monitored, sources covered and seat count.
Umami: What does it need to run?
A container and a PostgreSQL or MySQL database. Most people deploy it on infrastructure they already pay for.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Onclusive vs Roxhill
- Onclusive vs Northbeam
- Onclusive vs Buffer
- Onclusive vs Hootsuite
- Onclusive vs Bloomreach
- Onclusive vs Freshpaint
- Onclusive vs VWO
- Onclusive vs Moz
- Onclusive vs MoEngage
- Onclusive vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Onclusive vs Adverity
- Onclusive vs Whatagraph
- Onclusive vs Optimizely
- Onclusive vs Vimeo
- Onclusive vs Attribution
- Onclusive vs Countly
- Onclusive vs Matomo
- Onclusive vs Plausible
- Onclusive vs Fathom Analytics
- Onclusive vs Mautic
- Onclusive vs Simple Analytics
- Onclusive vs CallRail
- Onclusive vs Microsoft Clarity
- Onclusive vs Octoboard
- Onclusive vs WebEngage
- Onclusive vs Woopra
- Onclusive vs Wunderkind
- Umami vs Roxhill
- Umami vs Northbeam
- Umami vs Buffer
- Umami vs Hootsuite
- Umami vs Bloomreach
- Umami vs Freshpaint
- Umami vs VWO
- Umami vs Moz
- Umami vs MoEngage
- Umami vs Zoho Marketing Automation
- Umami vs Adverity
- Umami vs Whatagraph
- Umami vs Optimizely
- Umami vs Vimeo
- Umami vs Attribution
- Umami vs Countly
- Umami vs Matomo
- Umami vs Plausible
- Umami vs Fathom Analytics
- Umami vs Mautic
- Umami vs Simple Analytics
- Umami vs CallRail
- Umami vs Microsoft Clarity
- Umami vs Octoboard
- Umami vs WebEngage
- Umami vs Woopra
- Umami vs Wunderkind
