Logging · head to head
Loki vs Uptime.com

Uptime.com
Logging
Website monitoring and uptime checker with 80+ global monitoring points
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Loki has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Uptime.com pricing structure not fully detailed publicly
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Log aggregation, Uptime.com covers Website monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Uptime.com actually diverge.
| Attribute | Loki | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2014 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Uptime.com
- Website monitoring
- API monitoring
- Synthetic monitoring
- Page speed testing
- Real User Monitoring
- Status pages
- Private locations
- Global network
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Uptime.com
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Uptime.com
Uptime.com
- Monitor website availability across multiple global locationsnot Loki
- Test API endpoints and validate response timesnot Loki
- Verify DNS resolution and certificate validitynot Loki
- Track page load performance over timenot Loki
- Send alerts to teams when issues occurnot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Uptime.com
- Pricing structure not fully detailed publicly
- Limited information on check frequency in basic plans
- Real User Monitoring and status pages require add-ons
- Lower-tier plans may have feature limitations
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Uptime.com
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Uptime.com review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Uptime.com if
- You need website monitoring.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want api monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Uptime.com better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Uptime.com at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Uptime.com?
- Loki has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Loki and On request for Uptime.com.
- Does Loki or Uptime.com run on more platforms?
- Loki runs on Web, Api. Uptime.com runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Yes. Loki has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Uptime.com starts at On request.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Uptime.com is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Uptime.com cannot?
- Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Uptime.com covers Website monitoring, API monitoring, Synthetic monitoring, Page speed testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Loki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceUptime.com: Does Uptime.com offer a money-back guarantee?
Yes, Uptime.com provides a 30-day money-back guarantee for new users, allowing risk-free trial of their service.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceUptime.com: What alerting methods does Uptime.com support?
All plans include email and SMS alerting with 20+ integrations available including Slack, Teams, PagerDuty, and webhooks for custom integrations.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceUptime.com: How many monitoring locations does Uptime.com have?
Uptime.com operates 80+ monitoring locations worldwide, enabling checks from multiple geographic regions to detect regional connectivity issues.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs Cronitor
- Loki vs Healthchecks
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Traceloop
- Loki vs Openstatus
- Loki vs incident.io
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Honeybadger
- Loki vs Rollbar
- Loki vs Sematext
- Uptime.com vs Datadog Logs
- Uptime.com vs Coralogix
- Uptime.com vs Elastic Stack
- Uptime.com vs New Relic
- Uptime.com vs Dynatrace Logs
- Uptime.com vs Graylog
- Uptime.com vs Loggly
- Uptime.com vs Mezmo
- Uptime.com vs Retrace
- Uptime.com vs Logz.io
- Uptime.com vs Papertrail
- Uptime.com vs Raygun
- Uptime.com vs Elastic APM
- Uptime.com vs New Relic Logs
- Uptime.com vs Filebeat
- Uptime.com vs Logstash
- Uptime.com vs Checkly
- Uptime.com vs Cronitor
- Uptime.com vs Healthchecks
- Uptime.com vs InfluxDB
- Uptime.com vs Traceloop
- Uptime.com vs Openstatus
- Uptime.com vs incident.io
- Uptime.com vs AppDynamics
- Uptime.com vs Axiom
- Uptime.com vs Better Stack
- Uptime.com vs Honeybadger
- Uptime.com vs Rollbar
- Uptime.com vs Sematext

