Logging · head to head
Loki vs Traceloop

Traceloop
Logging
LLM reliability platform with open-source observability and evaluation
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Traceloop free tier limited to 50k spans per month and 24-hour retention, restricting production use
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Log aggregation, Traceloop covers Open-source SDK (OpenLLMetry).
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Traceloop actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Traceloop
- Open-source SDK (OpenLLMetry)
- Multi-provider support
- Observability platform integration
- Framework support
- Monitoring dashboard
- Evaluation system
- Deployment flexibility
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Traceloop
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Traceloop
Traceloop
- Monitoring LLM application performance in productionnot Loki
- Instrumenting LLM apps with minimal code overheadnot Loki
- Continuous evaluation and quality scoring of LLM outputsnot Loki
- Debugging LLM application issues with full trace visibilitynot Loki
- Integrating observability data into existing monitoring stacksnot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Traceloop
- Free tier limited to 50k spans per month and 24-hour retention, restricting production use
- Company acquisition by ServiceNow creates uncertainty about future roadmap
- Requires integration with separate observability platforms for visualization
- Less feature-rich than dedicated LLM evaluation platforms
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Traceloop
Free- FreeFree
- 50,000 spans per month
- Up to 5 seats
- 24-hour data retention
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Unlimited spans per month
- Unlimited seats
- Custom data retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Traceloop if
- You need open-source sdk (openllmetry).
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, On-premises, Air-gapped, Python, TypeScript, Go, Ruby.
- You also want multi-provider support.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Traceloop better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Traceloop at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Traceloop?
- Loki starts at Free and Traceloop at Free.
- Does Loki or Traceloop run on more platforms?
- Loki runs on Web, Api. Traceloop runs on Cloud, On-premises, Air-gapped, Python, TypeScript, Go, Ruby.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Traceloop is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Traceloop cannot?
- Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Traceloop covers Open-source SDK (OpenLLMetry), Multi-provider support, Observability platform integration, Framework support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Loki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceTraceloop: Is OpenLLMetry open-source?
Yes, OpenLLMetry is Traceloop's open-source SDK built on OpenTelemetry standards. It allows teams to instrument LLM applications with just 2 lines of code and send data to 25+ observability platforms.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceTraceloop: What is the impact of ServiceNow acquisition?
Traceloop is joining ServiceNow, representing a strategic acquisition that will broaden enterprise adoption and integration capabilities. Current operations continue with free and enterprise options available.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceTraceloop: How many LLM providers and frameworks does Traceloop support?
Traceloop supports 20+ LLM providers including OpenAI and Anthropic, and integrates with frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex. It can send data to 25+ observability platforms.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs Cronitor
- Loki vs Healthchecks
- Loki vs Uptime.com
- Loki vs Rootly
- Loki vs FireHydrant
- Loki vs incident.io
- Loki vs ELK Stack
- Loki vs Fluentd
- Loki vs Kibana
- Traceloop vs Datadog Logs
- Traceloop vs Coralogix
- Traceloop vs Elastic Stack
- Traceloop vs New Relic
- Traceloop vs Dynatrace Logs
- Traceloop vs Graylog
- Traceloop vs Loggly
- Traceloop vs Mezmo
- Traceloop vs Retrace
- Traceloop vs Logz.io
- Traceloop vs Papertrail
- Traceloop vs Raygun
- Traceloop vs Elastic APM
- Traceloop vs New Relic Logs
- Traceloop vs Filebeat
- Traceloop vs Logstash
- Traceloop vs InfluxDB
- Traceloop vs Checkly
- Traceloop vs Cronitor
- Traceloop vs Healthchecks
- Traceloop vs Uptime.com
- Traceloop vs Rootly
- Traceloop vs FireHydrant
- Traceloop vs incident.io
- Traceloop vs ELK Stack
- Traceloop vs Fluentd
- Traceloop vs Kibana

