Softwr

Log Management · head to head

Coralogix vs Loki

Coralogix logo

Coralogix

Log Management

Continuous Log Insights and Visibility

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Loki logo

Loki

Log Management

Like Prometheus but for Logs

From
Free
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Coralogix no self-hosted option; cloud-only SaaS requiring use of customer's AWS, Azure, or GCP infrastructure; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
  • They diverge on capability: Coralogix covers Machine learning analytics, Loki covers Label-based indexing.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Coralogix and Loki actually diverge.

Attributes where Coralogix and Loki differ
AttributeCoralogixLoki
Pricing modelusage-basedopen-source
PlatformsCloud-hosted (AWS, Azure, GCP)Web, Api
Founded20152014

Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Log Management).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Coralogix

  • Machine learning analytics
  • Alerts
  • Distributed tracing

Only in Loki

  • Label-based indexing
  • Real-time log streaming
  • LogQL query language

Both cover

  • Log aggregation
  • API
  • Webhooks
  • REST
  • Web support
  • Api support

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Coralogix

  • Enterprises requiring infinite log retention across logs, metrics, and tracesnot Loki
  • Organizations with cross-signal correlation needs (logs, metrics, traces unified)not Loki

Loki

  • Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Coralogix
  • Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Coralogix

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Coralogix

  • No self-hosted option; cloud-only SaaS requiring use of customer's AWS, Azure, or GCP infrastructure
  • Pricing is purely usage-based per GB with no flat-rate subscription option; suitable for unpredictable workloads but no cost ceiling

Loki

  • The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
  • Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
  • Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
  • The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges

Pricing, plan by plan

Coralogix

Free

No published plan breakdown. See the Coralogix review.

Loki

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Log aggregation
    • Label-based indexing
    • Real-time log streaming

Which should you pick?

Choose Coralogix if

  • You need machine learning analytics.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Cloud-hosted (AWS, Azure, GCP).
  • You also want alerts.
Coralogix review

Choose Loki if

  • You need label-based indexing.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You work on Web, Api.
  • You also want real-time log streaming.
Loki review

Questions people ask

Is Coralogix or Loki better?
Neither clearly leads. Coralogix starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Coralogix or Loki?
Coralogix starts at Free and Loki at Free.
Does Coralogix or Loki run on more platforms?
Coralogix runs on Cloud-hosted (AWS, Azure, GCP). Loki runs on Web, Api.
Can I use Coralogix for free?
Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Coralogix best used for?
Coralogix is most often used for enterprises requiring infinite log retention across logs, metrics, and traces, organizations with cross-signal correlation needs (logs, metrics, traces unified). Of those, enterprises requiring infinite log retention across logs, metrics, and traces and organizations with cross-signal correlation needs (logs, metrics, traces unified) are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
What can Coralogix do that Loki cannot?
Coralogix covers Machine learning analytics, Alerts, Distributed tracing. Loki covers Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
ShareXLinkedInRedditWhatsAppEmail

Related pages

More on Coralogix

More on Loki

Keep looking

Other head to heads