Logging · head to head
Cronitor vs Loki

Cronitor
Logging
Monitoring for cron jobs, websites, and background tasks
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cronitor free tier limited to 5 monitors, limiting viability for small teams; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Cronitor covers Cron job monitoring, Loki covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cronitor and Loki actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging), founded (2014).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cronitor
- Cron job monitoring
- Uptime and performance checks
- Heartbeat monitoring
- Status pages
- Real-user monitoring
- Alert integrations
- Email reports
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cronitor
- Monitoring scheduled cron jobs and background tasksnot Loki
- Tracking website and API uptime with global checksnot Loki
- Alerting teams when critical jobs fail to executenot Loki
- Communicating service status to customersnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Cronitor
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Cronitor
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cronitor
- Free tier limited to 5 monitors, limiting viability for small teams
- Pay-per-monitor pricing scales quickly with infrastructure size
- Requires integrating ping calls into existing jobs
- Limited to monitoring jobs that can send pings
- No built-in workflow orchestration or task scheduling
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Cronitor
Free- HackerFree
- 5 monitors
- Email and Slack alerts
- Basic status page
- Business$2/monitor/month
- Unlimited monitors
- 30-second check frequency
- 10 alert integrations
- Enterprise$6000/year
- Custom features and integrations
- 5-second check frequency
- Dedicated engineer
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Cronitor if
- You need cron job monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want uptime and performance checks.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Cronitor or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cronitor starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cronitor or Loki?
- Cronitor starts at Free and Loki at Free.
- Does Cronitor or Loki run on more platforms?
- Cronitor runs on Web, API. Loki runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Cronitor for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cronitor best used for?
- Cronitor is most often used for monitoring scheduled cron jobs and background tasks, tracking website and api uptime with global checks, alerting teams when critical jobs fail to execute, communicating service status to customers. Of those, monitoring scheduled cron jobs and background tasks and tracking website and api uptime with global checks are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Cronitor do that Loki cannot?
- Cronitor covers Cron job monitoring, Uptime and performance checks, Heartbeat monitoring, Status pages. Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cronitor: How does Cronitor billing work for the Business plan?
Business plan costs $2 per monitor per month plus $5 per user per month, billed monthly based on actual usage.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceCronitor: What is the difference between Hacker and Business plans?
Hacker plan ($0/month) includes 5 monitors and basic Slack/email alerts. Business plan ($2/monitor/month) offers unlimited monitors, 30-second checks, 10 integrations, 12-month retention, and email reports.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceCronitor: Does Cronitor offer a free trial?
Yes, Cronitor provides a 14-day free trial on the Business plan without requiring a credit card.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Cronitor vs Healthchecks
- Cronitor vs Openstatus
- Cronitor vs Checkly
- Cronitor vs Uptime.com
- Cronitor vs New Relic
- Cronitor vs FireHydrant
- Cronitor vs InfluxDB
- Cronitor vs Traceloop
- Cronitor vs incident.io
- Cronitor vs Dynatrace
- Cronitor vs Airbrake
- Cronitor vs AppDynamics
- Cronitor vs Timber
- Cronitor vs Vector
- Cronitor vs CloudWatch
- Cronitor vs Datadog Logs
- Cronitor vs Coralogix
- Cronitor vs Elastic Stack
- Cronitor vs Dynatrace Logs
- Cronitor vs Graylog
- Cronitor vs Loggly
- Cronitor vs Mezmo
- Cronitor vs Retrace
- Cronitor vs Logz.io
- Cronitor vs Papertrail
- Cronitor vs Raygun
- Cronitor vs Elastic APM
- Cronitor vs New Relic Logs
- Cronitor vs Filebeat
- Cronitor vs Logstash
- Loki vs Healthchecks
- Loki vs Openstatus
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs Uptime.com
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs FireHydrant
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Traceloop
- Loki vs incident.io
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Timber
- Loki vs Vector
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash

