Logging · head to head
Filebeat vs Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Filebeat filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Filebeat covers File tailing, Loki covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Filebeat and Loki actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Filebeat
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
- Input harvesting
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Filebeat
- Log monitoringnot Loki
- Application performancenot Loki
- Security analyticsnot Loki
- Troubleshootingnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Filebeat
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Filebeat
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Filebeat
- Filebeat ships only as part of the Elastic Stack and has no standalone commercial license; using it in production requires deploying Elasticsearch and typically Kibana alongside it.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Filebeat
Free- FreeFree
- File tailing
- Log forwarding
- Event parsing
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Filebeat if
- You need file tailing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want log forwarding.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Filebeat or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Filebeat starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Filebeat or Loki?
- Filebeat starts at Free and Loki at Free.
- Does Filebeat or Loki run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Filebeat for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Filebeat best used for?
- Filebeat is most often used for log monitoring, application performance, security analytics, troubleshooting. Of those, log monitoring and application performance are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Filebeat do that Loki cannot?
- Filebeat covers File tailing, Log forwarding, Event parsing, Input harvesting. Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Filebeat: What does Filebeat cost?
Filebeat is free and open source. There are no licensing fees for the software itself.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceFilebeat: Is Filebeat free for commercial use?
Yes. Filebeat is open and free to use for any purpose, including commercial applications.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceFilebeat: Do I need to pay for Elastic Cloud to use Filebeat?
No. Filebeat works independently without any Elastic Cloud subscription, though Elastic Cloud is offered as an optional paid deployment option.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Filebeat vs Datadog Logs
- Filebeat vs Coralogix
- Filebeat vs New Relic
- Filebeat vs Sematext
- Filebeat vs Grafana Loki
- Filebeat vs Better Stack
- Filebeat vs Dynatrace Logs
- Filebeat vs Elastic
- Filebeat vs Fluent Bit
- Filebeat vs Loggly
- Filebeat vs Papertrail
- Filebeat vs Raygun
- Filebeat vs Retrace
- Filebeat vs Rollbar
- Filebeat vs Splunk Cloud
- Filebeat vs New Relic Logs
- Filebeat vs Elastic Stack
- Filebeat vs Graylog
- Filebeat vs Mezmo
- Filebeat vs Logz.io
- Filebeat vs Elastic APM
- Filebeat vs Logstash
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Sematext
- Loki vs Grafana Loki
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Elastic
- Loki vs Fluent Bit
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Rollbar
- Loki vs Splunk Cloud
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Logstash


