Logging · head to head
Elastic APM vs Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Elastic APM pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Loki covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Elastic APM and Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Elastic APM | Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Elastic APM
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
- Custom metrics
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Elastic APM
- Distributed tracing across microservicesnot Loki
- Auto-instrumenting Java, .NET, Python, Go, Node.js, Ruby, PHP and C++ servicesnot Loki
- OpenTelemetry-native collection through the Elastic distributionsnot Loki
- Correlating latency and errors with machine learningnot Loki
- Monitoring LLM calls alongside application tracesnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Elastic APM
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Elastic APM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Elastic APM
- Pricing is not published on the product page; cost follows the underlying Elastic deployment rather than being quoted per host or per service
- Self-managed deployment means running and scaling Elasticsearch yourself
- Serverless does not carry every capability the hosted option does
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Elastic APM
Free- FreeFree
- Performance monitoring
- Error tracking
- Transaction tracing
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Elastic APM if
- You need performance monitoring.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want error tracking.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Elastic APM or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Elastic APM starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Elastic APM or Loki?
- Elastic APM starts at Free and Loki at Free.
- Does Elastic APM or Loki run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Elastic APM for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Elastic APM best used for?
- Elastic APM is most often used for distributed tracing across microservices, auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services, opentelemetry-native collection through the elastic distributions, correlating latency and errors with machine learning. Of those, distributed tracing across microservices and auto-instrumenting java, .net, python, go, node.js, ruby, php and c++ services are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Elastic APM do that Loki cannot?
- Elastic APM covers Performance monitoring, Error tracking, Transaction tracing, Custom metrics. Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Elastic APM: Is Elastic APM pricing published?
Elastic APM pricing is not published on the product page. Pricing is available through the main Elastic pricing page or by contacting Elastic sales directly.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceElastic APM: Does Elastic APM offer a free trial?
Yes. Elastic APM offers a free trial through Elastic Cloud Serverless registration. A guided demo is also available in the Elastic demo gallery.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceElastic APM: What deployment options are available for Elastic APM?
Elastic APM can be deployed on Elastic Cloud Serverless (zero operational overhead), Elastic Cloud Hosted (deploy on any cloud), or self-managed Elasticsearch.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
More on Elastic APM
Other head to heads
- Elastic APM vs New Relic
- Elastic APM vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic APM vs Coralogix
- Elastic APM vs Grafana Loki
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace
- Elastic APM vs AppDynamics
- Elastic APM vs Retrace
- Elastic APM vs Cronitor
- Elastic APM vs InfluxDB
- Elastic APM vs Checkly
- Elastic APM vs CloudWatch
- Elastic APM vs Airbrake
- Elastic APM vs Better Stack
- Elastic APM vs Bugsnag
- Elastic APM vs Fluent Bit
- Elastic APM vs Graylog
- Elastic APM vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic APM vs Fluentd
- Elastic APM vs Elastic Stack
- Elastic APM vs Loggly
- Elastic APM vs Mezmo
- Elastic APM vs Logz.io
- Elastic APM vs Papertrail
- Elastic APM vs Raygun
- Elastic APM vs New Relic Logs
- Elastic APM vs Filebeat
- Elastic APM vs Logstash
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Grafana Loki
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Cronitor
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Bugsnag
- Loki vs Fluent Bit
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Fluentd
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash


