Logging · head to head
Loggly vs Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loggly the free Lite plan caps ingest at 200 MB per day with 7 day retention; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Loggly covers Real-time search, Loki covers Label-based indexing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loggly and Loki actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loggly
- Real-time search
- Custom dashboards
- Alert management
Only in Loki
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- Log aggregation
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loggly
- Cloud-hosted log aggregation for small and mid-sized engineering teamsnot Loki
- Alerting on log patterns via email, webhook, PagerDuty or Slacknot Loki
- Log analysis alongside SolarWinds infrastructure and application monitoringnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Loggly
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Loggly
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loggly
- The free Lite plan caps ingest at 200 MB per day with 7 day retention
- API access and archiving to Amazon S3 start on the Pro plan at $159 per month billed annually
- Federated identity management is an Enterprise feature, starting at $279 per month billed annually
- The Standard plan at $79 per month is limited to 1 GB per day and 3 source groups
- Maximum retention is 90 days and only on Enterprise; Standard is fixed at 15 days
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Loggly
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Real-time search
- Custom dashboards
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Loggly if
- You need real-time search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want custom dashboards.
Choose Loki if
- You need label-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time log streaming.
Questions people ask
- Is Loggly or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loggly starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loggly or Loki?
- Loggly starts at Free and Loki at Free.
- Does Loggly or Loki run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Loggly for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loggly best used for?
- Loggly is most often used for cloud-hosted log aggregation for small and mid-sized engineering teams, alerting on log patterns via email, webhook, pagerduty or slack, log analysis alongside solarwinds infrastructure and application monitoring. Of those, cloud-hosted log aggregation for small and mid-sized engineering teams and alerting on log patterns via email, webhook, pagerduty or slack are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Loggly do that Loki cannot?
- Loggly covers Real-time search, Custom dashboards, Alert management. Loki covers Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Loki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Loggly vs Datadog Logs
- Loggly vs New Relic
- Loggly vs Coralogix
- Loggly vs Elastic Stack
- Loggly vs Sumo Logic
- Loggly vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loggly vs Splunk Cloud
- Loggly vs FireHydrant
- Loggly vs Rootly
- Loggly vs Axiom
- Loggly vs Uptime.com
- Loggly vs Vector
- Loggly vs Checkly
- Loggly vs CloudWatch
- Loggly vs Airbrake
- Loggly vs ELK Stack
- Loggly vs Dynatrace
- Loggly vs Filebeat
- Loggly vs Graylog
- Loggly vs Mezmo
- Loggly vs Retrace
- Loggly vs Logz.io
- Loggly vs Papertrail
- Loggly vs Raygun
- Loggly vs Elastic APM
- Loggly vs New Relic Logs
- Loggly vs Logstash
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs Sumo Logic
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Splunk Cloud
- Loki vs FireHydrant
- Loki vs Rootly
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Uptime.com
- Loki vs Vector
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs ELK Stack
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Logstash


