Software · head to head
Elastic Stack vs Loki

Elastic Stack
Software
Search, Observability, and Security Solutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Loki has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Elastic Stack self-managed deployment requires licensing based on node count and RAM usage; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Elastic Stack covers Full-text search, Loki covers Log aggregation.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Elastic Stack and Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Elastic Stack | Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK) | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Elastic Stack
- Full-text search
- Log analytics
- Security monitoring
- Alerting
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Elastic Stack
- Distributed search and analytics engine for production-scale workloadsnot Loki
- Full-text search and vector search with approximate nearest neighbour supportnot Loki
- Security event tracking with field-level and document-level access controlnot Loki
- Machine learning capabilities including anomaly detection and forecastingnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Elastic Stack
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Elastic Stack
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Elastic Stack
- Self-managed deployment requires licensing based on node count and RAM usage
- Serverless option has pending features including traffic filtering and bring-your-own-key encryption
- Hosted deployment requires custom resource configuration for cluster management
- Pricing models differ significantly across Hosted, Serverless, and Self-managed options
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Elastic Stack
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Elastic Stack review.
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Elastic Stack if
- You need full-text search.
- You work on Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK).
- You also want log analytics.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Elastic Stack or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Elastic Stack starts at On request and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Elastic Stack or Loki?
- Loki has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Elastic Stack and Free for Loki.
- Does Elastic Stack or Loki run on more platforms?
- Elastic Stack runs on Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK). Loki runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Yes. Loki has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Elastic Stack starts at On request.
- What is Elastic Stack best used for?
- Elastic Stack is most often used for distributed search and analytics engine for production-scale workloads, full-text search and vector search with approximate nearest neighbour support, security event tracking with field-level and document-level access control, machine learning capabilities including anomaly detection and forecasting. Of those, distributed search and analytics engine for production-scale workloads and full-text search and vector search with approximate nearest neighbour support are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Elastic Stack do that Loki cannot?
- Elastic Stack covers Full-text search, Log analytics, Security monitoring, Alerting. Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Related pages
More on Elastic Stack
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Elastic Stack vs New Relic
- Elastic Stack vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic Stack vs Coralogix
- Elastic Stack vs Grafana Loki
- Elastic Stack vs CloudWatch
- Elastic Stack vs Dynatrace
- Elastic Stack vs InfluxDB
- Elastic Stack vs Airbrake
- Elastic Stack vs AppDynamics
- Elastic Stack vs Axiom
- Elastic Stack vs Azure Monitor
- Elastic Stack vs Better Stack
- Elastic Stack vs Bugsnag
- Elastic Stack vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic Stack vs Elastic
- Elastic Stack vs Elastic APM
- Elastic Stack vs Elasticsearch Service
- Elastic Stack vs ELK Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Grafana Loki
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Bugsnag
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Elastic
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Elasticsearch Service
- Loki vs ELK Stack

