Logging · head to head
Elastic Stack vs Loki

Elastic Stack
Logging
Search, Observability, and Security Solutions
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Loki has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Elastic Stack self-managed deployment requires licensing based on node count and RAM usage; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Elastic Stack covers Full-text search, Loki covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Elastic Stack and Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Elastic Stack | Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | open-source |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK) | Web, Api |
| Founded | 2011 | 2014 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Elastic Stack
- Full-text search
- Log analytics
- Security monitoring
- Alerting
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Elastic Stack
- Distributed search and analytics engine for production-scale workloadsnot Loki
- Full-text search and vector search with approximate nearest neighbour supportnot Loki
- Security event tracking with field-level and document-level access controlnot Loki
- Machine learning capabilities including anomaly detection and forecastingnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Elastic Stack
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Elastic Stack
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Elastic Stack
- Self-managed deployment requires licensing based on node count and RAM usage
- Serverless option has pending features including traffic filtering and bring-your-own-key encryption
- Hosted deployment requires custom resource configuration for cluster management
- Pricing models differ significantly across Hosted, Serverless, and Self-managed options
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Elastic Stack
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Elastic Stack review.
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Elastic Stack if
- You need full-text search.
- You work on Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK).
- You also want log analytics.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Elastic Stack or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Elastic Stack starts at On request and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Elastic Stack or Loki?
- Loki has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Elastic Stack and Free for Loki.
- Does Elastic Stack or Loki run on more platforms?
- Elastic Stack runs on Cloud-hosted, Self-managed, Docker, Kubernetes (ECK). Loki runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Yes. Loki has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Elastic Stack starts at On request.
- What is Elastic Stack best used for?
- Elastic Stack is most often used for distributed search and analytics engine for production-scale workloads, full-text search and vector search with approximate nearest neighbour support, security event tracking with field-level and document-level access control, machine learning capabilities including anomaly detection and forecasting. Of those, distributed search and analytics engine for production-scale workloads and full-text search and vector search with approximate nearest neighbour support are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Elastic Stack do that Loki cannot?
- Elastic Stack covers Full-text search, Log analytics, Security monitoring, Alerting. Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Elastic Stack: How much does Elastic Stack cost?
Elastic does not publish specific pricing on the Elastic Stack product page. Users can start a 14-day free trial with no credit card required, but ongoing subscription pricing requires contacting their sales team.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceElastic Stack: What deployment options are available for Elastic Stack?
Users can deploy Elastic Stack on Elastic Cloud (hosted on AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure) or download it for self-managed deployment. Pricing for managed cloud hosting must be obtained by starting a trial or contacting sales.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
More on Elastic Stack
Other head to heads
- Elastic Stack vs Grafana Loki
- Elastic Stack vs Better Stack
- Elastic Stack vs Humio
- Elastic Stack vs Logz.io
- Elastic Stack vs Papertrail
- Elastic Stack vs Sematext
- Elastic Stack vs Splunk Enterprise
- Elastic Stack vs Sumo Logic
- Elastic Stack vs New Relic
- Elastic Stack vs Datadog Logs
- Elastic Stack vs Coralogix
- Elastic Stack vs CloudWatch
- Elastic Stack vs Dynatrace
- Elastic Stack vs Airbrake
- Elastic Stack vs AppDynamics
- Elastic Stack vs Axiom
- Elastic Stack vs Azure Monitor
- Elastic Stack vs Dynatrace Logs
- Elastic Stack vs Graylog
- Elastic Stack vs Loggly
- Elastic Stack vs Mezmo
- Elastic Stack vs Retrace
- Elastic Stack vs Raygun
- Elastic Stack vs Elastic APM
- Elastic Stack vs New Relic Logs
- Elastic Stack vs Filebeat
- Elastic Stack vs Logstash
- Loki vs Grafana Loki
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Humio
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Sematext
- Loki vs Splunk Enterprise
- Loki vs Sumo Logic
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash

