Logging · head to head
Loki vs Papertrail
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Papertrail log Observability starts at $5.00 per GB per month
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Label-based indexing, Papertrail covers Real-time tail.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Papertrail actually diverge.
| Attribute | Loki | Papertrail |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | subscription |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Only in Papertrail
- Real-time tail
- Saved searches
- System alerts
Both cover
- Log aggregation
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Papertrail
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Papertrail
Papertrail
- Aggregating syslog and application logs from many hosts into one searchable streamnot Loki
- Tail-and-search style troubleshooting during incidentsnot Loki
- Long-term log archiving to Amazon S3 for later analysisnot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Papertrail
- Log Observability starts at $5.00 per GB per month
- Usage beyond the plan volume is billed at a 30% higher price per GB and is capped at 200% extra
- Transferred volume is measured as message length plus 50 bytes of metadata per message, so metadata counts against the quota
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Papertrail
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Real-time tail
- Saved searches
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need label-based indexing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want real-time log streaming.
Choose Papertrail if
- You need real-time tail.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want saved searches.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Papertrail better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Papertrail at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Papertrail?
- Loki starts at Free and Papertrail at Free.
- Does Loki or Papertrail run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Papertrail is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Papertrail cannot?
- Loki covers Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Papertrail covers Real-time tail, Saved searches, System alerts. Both handle Log aggregation, API, Webhooks, REST.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Loki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs Axiom
- Loki vs Humio
- Loki vs Rollbar
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Sumo Logic
- Loki vs Timber
- Loki vs Traceloop
- Loki vs Uptime.com
- Loki vs Vector
- Loki vs Elastic
- Loki vs Telegraf
- Papertrail vs Datadog Logs
- Papertrail vs Coralogix
- Papertrail vs Elastic Stack
- Papertrail vs New Relic
- Papertrail vs Dynatrace Logs
- Papertrail vs Graylog
- Papertrail vs Loggly
- Papertrail vs Mezmo
- Papertrail vs Retrace
- Papertrail vs Logz.io
- Papertrail vs Raygun
- Papertrail vs Elastic APM
- Papertrail vs New Relic Logs
- Papertrail vs Filebeat
- Papertrail vs Logstash
- Papertrail vs AppDynamics
- Papertrail vs Axiom
- Papertrail vs Humio
- Papertrail vs Rollbar
- Papertrail vs InfluxDB
- Papertrail vs Sumo Logic
- Papertrail vs Timber
- Papertrail vs Traceloop
- Papertrail vs Uptime.com
- Papertrail vs Vector
- Papertrail vs Elastic
- Papertrail vs Telegraf


