Logging · head to head
Loki vs Retrace
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Retrace end of Life scheduled for March 31, 2027; the product is being discontinued
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Log aggregation, Retrace covers Log management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Retrace actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Only in Retrace
- Log management
- Application performance tracking
- Error detection
- Code profiling
- Performance baselines
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Retrace
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Retrace
Retrace
- Log monitoringnot Loki
- Application performancenot Loki
- Security analyticsnot Loki
- Troubleshootingnot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Retrace
- End of Life scheduled for March 31, 2027; the product is being discontinued
- Costs escalate quickly with per-server billing model, expensive at scale
- User interface and dashboard criticisms; UI is outdated and difficult to use
- Logging latency; logs can take time to appear and are not instant
- Less mature support for Node.js, Python, and newer ecosystems
- Reporting issues where process restarts provide only timeline without root cause data
- Reliability concerns; monitoring has stopped collecting traces with no warning
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Retrace
Free- FreeFree
- Log management
- Application performance tracking
- Error detection
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Retrace if
- You need log management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, .NET, Java, PHP, Node.js, Python.
- You also want application performance tracking.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Retrace better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Retrace at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Retrace?
- Loki starts at Free and Retrace at Free.
- Does Loki or Retrace run on more platforms?
- Loki runs on Web, Api. Retrace runs on Web, .NET, Java, PHP, Node.js, Python.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Retrace is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Retrace cannot?
- Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Retrace covers Log management, Application performance tracking, Error detection, Code profiling. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Loki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceRetrace: What does Retrace monitor?
Retrace provides application performance monitoring (APM), centralized log management, error tracking, code profiling, and real user monitoring (RUM). It aggregates logs from applications and servers in one place.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceRetrace: What programming languages does Retrace support?
Retrace supports .NET, .NET Core, PHP, Node.js, Ruby, Python, and Java applications. Support for Node.js, Python, and newer ecosystems is noted as less mature.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRetrace: Is Retrace being discontinued?
Yes. Retrace will reach End of Life on March 31, 2027. Users should plan to migrate to alternative solutions.
SourceRetrace: What databases and services does Retrace integrate with?
Retrace supports SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, MySQL, Redis, MongoDB, Elasticsearch, and cloud platforms like AWS and Azure.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs AppDynamics
- Loki vs incident.io
- Loki vs Cronitor
- Loki vs FireHydrant
- Loki vs Rootly
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Bugsnag
- Loki vs Elastic
- Retrace vs Datadog Logs
- Retrace vs Coralogix
- Retrace vs Elastic Stack
- Retrace vs New Relic
- Retrace vs Dynatrace Logs
- Retrace vs Graylog
- Retrace vs Loggly
- Retrace vs Mezmo
- Retrace vs Logz.io
- Retrace vs Papertrail
- Retrace vs Raygun
- Retrace vs Elastic APM
- Retrace vs New Relic Logs
- Retrace vs Filebeat
- Retrace vs Logstash
- Retrace vs Dynatrace
- Retrace vs AppDynamics
- Retrace vs incident.io
- Retrace vs Cronitor
- Retrace vs FireHydrant
- Retrace vs Rootly
- Retrace vs Airbrake
- Retrace vs Azure Monitor
- Retrace vs Better Stack
- Retrace vs Bugsnag
- Retrace vs Elastic


