Logging · head to head
Honeybadger vs Loki
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Honeybadger the free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor; Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- They diverge on capability: Honeybadger covers Error tracking, Loki covers Log aggregation.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Honeybadger and Loki actually diverge.
| Attribute | Honeybadger | Loki |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Honeybadger
- Error tracking
- Uptime monitoring
- Status pages
- Incident management
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
Both cover
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
- Api support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Honeybadger
- Exception and error tracking for Ruby, Elixir, PHP, Python and JavaScript applicationsnot Loki
- Uptime and cron heartbeat monitoring alongside error datanot Loki
- Publishing a public status page for a small SaaS productnot Loki
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Honeybadger
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Honeybadger
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Honeybadger
- The free Developer plan is limited to one user, 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day of logging and one uptime monitor
- SSO, unlimited teams and priority support require the Business plan at $80 per month
- Error data retention is 15 days on Developer, 90 days on Team and 180 days on Business
- Log and event retention is 7 days on the free plan and up to 30 days on Team
- Premium integrations including Jira, PagerDuty, SMS and webhooks are excluded from the free Developer plan
- S3 archiving of Insights events is not available on the Developer plan
- Uptime check frequency is capped at 5 minutes on Developer and 2 minutes on Team; 1 minute checks require Business
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Honeybadger
Free- DeveloperFree
- 5,000 errors per month
- 50 MB per day logging
- 1 monitor
- Team$26/month
- 50,000 errors per month
- 100 MB per day logging
- 5 monitors
- Business$80/month
- 50,000 errors per month
- 100 MB per day logging
- 5 monitors
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Which should you pick?
Choose Honeybadger if
- You need error tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want uptime monitoring.
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Questions people ask
- Is Honeybadger or Loki better?
- Neither clearly leads. Honeybadger starts at Free and Loki at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Honeybadger or Loki?
- Honeybadger starts at Free and Loki at Free.
- Does Honeybadger or Loki run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Api, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Honeybadger for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Honeybadger best used for?
- Honeybadger is most often used for exception and error tracking for ruby, elixir, php, python and javascript applications, uptime and cron heartbeat monitoring alongside error data, publishing a public status page for a small saas product. Of those, exception and error tracking for ruby, elixir, php, python and javascript applications and uptime and cron heartbeat monitoring alongside error data are not what Loki is typically brought in for.
- What can Honeybadger do that Loki cannot?
- Honeybadger covers Error tracking, Uptime monitoring, Status pages, Incident management. Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Both handle API, Webhooks, REST, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Honeybadger: Is Honeybadger free?
Honeybadger offers a free Developer plan permanently with 5,000 errors per month, 50 MB per day logging, and 1 monitor, supporting unlimited projects for a single user.
SourceLoki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceHoneybadger: How much does the Honeybadger Team plan cost annually?
The Team plan costs $26 per month billed annually at $286 per year, providing 50,000 errors per month with unlimited users and 90-day error retention.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceHoneybadger: What's the difference between Honeybadger Business and Team plans?
Both Team and Business plans include 50,000 errors per month, but Business adds 180-day error retention (vs 90-day), includes enterprise security and compliance features, and supports unlimited teams.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceRelated pages
More on Honeybadger
Other head to heads
- Honeybadger vs Elastic Stack
- Honeybadger vs New Relic
- Honeybadger vs Datadog Logs
- Honeybadger vs Coralogix
- Honeybadger vs Openstatus
- Honeybadger vs Airbrake
- Honeybadger vs Checkly
- Honeybadger vs Rollbar
- Honeybadger vs CloudWatch
- Honeybadger vs Azure Monitor
- Honeybadger vs Better Stack
- Honeybadger vs Raygun
- Honeybadger vs Loggly
- Honeybadger vs Logz.io
- Honeybadger vs Mezmo
- Honeybadger vs Logstash
- Honeybadger vs New Relic Logs
- Honeybadger vs Dynatrace Logs
- Honeybadger vs Graylog
- Honeybadger vs Retrace
- Honeybadger vs Papertrail
- Honeybadger vs Elastic APM
- Honeybadger vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Openstatus
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs Rollbar
- Loki vs CloudWatch
- Loki vs Azure Monitor
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs Filebeat


