Logging · head to head
Loki vs Openstatus

Openstatus
Logging
Status pages with uptime monitoring and compliance-ready incident tracking
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Loki the Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention; Openstatus free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page
- They diverge on capability: Loki covers Log aggregation, Openstatus covers Branded status pages.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Loki and Openstatus actually diverge.
| Attribute | Loki | Openstatus |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Founded | 2014 | 2023 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), platforms (Web, Api), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logging).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Loki
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
- LogQL query language
- API
- Webhooks
- REST
- Web support
Only in Openstatus
- Branded status pages
- Global monitoring
- Incident notifications
- Audit-ready trails
- API and CLI access
- Terraform provider
- Self-hosting
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Loki
- Aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexingnot Openstatus
- Querying logs alongside metrics in Grafananot Openstatus
Openstatus
- Publishing incident status pages to customersnot Loki
- Demonstrating compliance readiness to auditorsnot Loki
- Alerting internal teams when services are downnot Loki
- Tracking uptime metrics across global regionsnot Loki
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Loki
- The Grafana Cloud free tier caps log ingestion at 50 GB a month with 14 day retention
- Paid log pricing is split across three separate meters, at $0.050 per GB processed, $0.400 per GB written and $0.100 per GB retained
- Retaining logs is billed separately from ingesting them, so keeping data costs on an ongoing basis rather than once
- The Pro plan carries a $19 a month platform fee before any usage charges
Openstatus
- Free tier severely limited to 1 monitor and 1 status page
- Per-status-page pricing adds cost for multi-product organizations
- No built-in workflow orchestration or incident response automation
- Limited historical analytics beyond incident documentation
- No AI-powered incident diagnosis or root cause analysis
Pricing, plan by plan
Loki
Free- FreeFree
- Log aggregation
- Label-based indexing
- Real-time log streaming
Openstatus
Free- FreeFree
- 1 monitor with 10-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 3 components
- No credit card required
- Starter$30/month
- 20 monitors with 1-minute intervals
- 1 status page with 20 components
- 3-month data retention
- Pro$100/month
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 5 status pages with 50 components each
- 12-month data retention
- Scale$500/month
- 50 monitors with 30-second intervals
- 10 status pages with 500 components each
- 24-month data retention
Which should you pick?
Choose Loki if
- You need log aggregation.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want label-based indexing.
Choose Openstatus if
- You need branded status pages.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want global monitoring.
Questions people ask
- Is Loki or Openstatus better?
- Neither clearly leads. Loki starts at Free and Openstatus at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Loki or Openstatus?
- Loki starts at Free and Openstatus at Free.
- Does Loki or Openstatus run on more platforms?
- Loki runs on Web, Api. Openstatus runs on Web, API.
- Can I use Loki for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Loki best used for?
- Loki is most often used for aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing, querying logs alongside metrics in grafana. Of those, aggregating application and infrastructure logs with label based indexing and querying logs alongside metrics in grafana are not what Openstatus is typically brought in for.
- What can Loki do that Openstatus cannot?
- Loki covers Log aggregation, Label-based indexing, Real-time log streaming, LogQL query language. Openstatus covers Branded status pages, Global monitoring, Incident notifications, Audit-ready trails.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Loki: What does it cost to use Grafana Loki?
Loki is open source and free under the AGPLv3 license for self-hosted deployments. Grafana's managed Cloud Logs service includes a free tier up to 50GB of logs at no cost.
SourceOpenstatus: Can I use OpenStatus for free?
Yes, the free tier includes 1 monitor with 10-minute check intervals and 1 status page with 3 components, no credit card required.
SourceLoki: Are there paid options for Loki beyond the free tier?
Yes. Grafana Cloud Logs offers paid tiers for teams and enterprises, and Enterprise Logs provides self-managed options with expert support for organizations with data localization or privacy requirements.
SourceOpenstatus: What is included in annual billing for Starter plan?
Annual billing costs $300/year (vs $360/month), saving 2 months. Includes 20 monitors, 1-minute intervals, and all alert types.
SourceLoki: What license does open source Loki use?
Loki is released under the AGPLv3 license, which requires you to share modifications and publish your source code if you deploy modifications publicly.
SourceOpenstatus: Can I add extra status pages beyond my plan limit?
Yes, additional status pages cost $20/month and are billed separately on top of your plan.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Loki vs Datadog Logs
- Loki vs Coralogix
- Loki vs Elastic Stack
- Loki vs New Relic
- Loki vs Dynatrace Logs
- Loki vs Graylog
- Loki vs Loggly
- Loki vs Mezmo
- Loki vs Retrace
- Loki vs Logz.io
- Loki vs Papertrail
- Loki vs Raygun
- Loki vs Elastic APM
- Loki vs New Relic Logs
- Loki vs Filebeat
- Loki vs Logstash
- Loki vs incident.io
- Loki vs Cronitor
- Loki vs Healthchecks
- Loki vs FireHydrant
- Loki vs Rootly
- Loki vs Checkly
- Loki vs Uptime.com
- Loki vs Honeybadger
- Loki vs Better Stack
- Loki vs InfluxDB
- Loki vs Dynatrace
- Loki vs Airbrake
- Openstatus vs Datadog Logs
- Openstatus vs Coralogix
- Openstatus vs Elastic Stack
- Openstatus vs New Relic
- Openstatus vs Dynatrace Logs
- Openstatus vs Graylog
- Openstatus vs Loggly
- Openstatus vs Mezmo
- Openstatus vs Retrace
- Openstatus vs Logz.io
- Openstatus vs Papertrail
- Openstatus vs Raygun
- Openstatus vs Elastic APM
- Openstatus vs New Relic Logs
- Openstatus vs Filebeat
- Openstatus vs Logstash
- Openstatus vs incident.io
- Openstatus vs Cronitor
- Openstatus vs Healthchecks
- Openstatus vs FireHydrant
- Openstatus vs Rootly
- Openstatus vs Checkly
- Openstatus vs Uptime.com
- Openstatus vs Honeybadger
- Openstatus vs Better Stack
- Openstatus vs InfluxDB
- Openstatus vs Dynatrace
- Openstatus vs Airbrake

