Fleet Management · head to head
Chevin FleetWave vs ArcGIS Field Maps

Chevin FleetWave
Fleet Management
Fleet management system covering vehicles and equipment assets, sold in three tiers from FleetWave Lite at £3 per vehicle per month upward
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Chevin FleetWave only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.; ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- They diverge on capability: Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling, ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Chevin FleetWave and ArcGIS Field Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Chevin FleetWave | ArcGIS Field Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per vehicle per month (Lite); quote for Core and Advanced | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | iOS, Android, Web |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Chevin FleetWave
- Maintenance scheduling
- Compliance tracking
- Fuel management
- Total cost of ownership reporting
- Multi-asset tracking
- Accident and incident recording
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Chevin FleetWave
- A smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance trackingnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate toolsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- An operation needing total cost of ownership reporting broken down by vehicle and asset typenot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A fleet outgrowing FleetWave Lite and needing Core or Advanced tier compliance and reporting depthnot ArcGIS Field Maps
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Chevin FleetWave
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Chevin FleetWave
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Chevin FleetWave
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Chevin FleetWave
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Chevin FleetWave
- Only the Lite tier has a published price; any fleet with real operational complexity ends up in the unpublished Core or Advanced tier regardless of the appealing £3 headline figure.
- Pricing is in GBP by default, reflecting Chevin UK base, which adds currency conversion uncertainty for buyers budgeting in other currencies before a formal quote.
- The Lite tier is explicitly a simpler feature set, so a fleet that starts there and later needs compliance depth or multi-asset TCO reporting faces a tier upgrade and a new, unpublished price negotiation.
- As a UK-headquartered vendor, integration depth with US-centric telematics and fuel card providers may be less mature than with UK and European partners.
- Equipment and asset pricing at $0.50 per asset is a separate line item from the vehicle rate, so a mixed vehicle-and-equipment fleet needs to calculate two different per-unit costs to budget accurately.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Pricing, plan by plan
Chevin FleetWave
On request- FleetWave Lite$undefined/month
- £3 per vehicle per month
- Equipment and associated assets $0.50 per asset
- Simpler feature set aimed at smaller or less complex fleets
- FleetWave Core / Advanced$undefined/year
- No published pricing, consultation required
- Expanded compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting features
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Which should you pick?
Choose Chevin FleetWave if
- You need maintenance scheduling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want compliance tracking.
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Questions people ask
- Is Chevin FleetWave or ArcGIS Field Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Chevin FleetWave starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Chevin FleetWave or ArcGIS Field Maps?
- Chevin FleetWave starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request.
- Does Chevin FleetWave or ArcGIS Field Maps run on more platforms?
- Chevin FleetWave runs on Web, iOS, Android. ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- What is Chevin FleetWave best used for?
- Chevin FleetWave is most often used for a smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance tracking, a mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate tools, an operation needing total cost of ownership reporting broken down by vehicle and asset type, a fleet outgrowing fleetwave lite and needing core or advanced tier compliance and reporting depth. Of those, a smaller fleet wanting a published, budgetable entry price rather than a full sales negotiation for basic maintenance and compliance tracking and a mixed fleet needing vehicles and non-vehicle equipment tracked in one system rather than separate tools are not what ArcGIS Field Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Chevin FleetWave do that ArcGIS Field Maps cannot?
- Chevin FleetWave covers Maintenance scheduling, Compliance tracking, Fuel management, Total cost of ownership reporting. ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Chevin FleetWave: Is FleetWave pricing public?
Only for the Lite tier, at £3 per vehicle per month plus $0.50 per equipment asset. Core and Advanced tiers require a consultation.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Chevin FleetWave: What is the difference between Lite, Core and Advanced?
Lite is a simpler feature set for smaller or less complex fleets; Core and Advanced add compliance, TCO and multi-asset reporting depth, priced separately.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Chevin FleetWave: Does it track non-vehicle equipment?
Yes, equipment and associated assets are tracked within the same platform, priced separately from vehicles.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on Chevin FleetWave
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- Chevin FleetWave vs Samsara
- Chevin FleetWave vs AssetWorks
- Chevin FleetWave vs Geotab
- Chevin FleetWave vs Verizon Connect
- Chevin FleetWave vs Azuga
- Chevin FleetWave vs Omnitracs
- Chevin FleetWave vs Whip Around
- Chevin FleetWave vs Fleet Complete
- Chevin FleetWave vs CalAmp
- Chevin FleetWave vs Uptake
- Chevin FleetWave vs Motive
- Chevin FleetWave vs Route4Me
- Chevin FleetWave vs Lytx
- Chevin FleetWave vs NexTraq
- Chevin FleetWave vs Quartix
- Chevin FleetWave vs Ridecell
- Chevin FleetWave vs Webfleet
- Chevin FleetWave vs QGIS
- Chevin FleetWave vs SW Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs Felt
- Chevin FleetWave vs CARTO
- Chevin FleetWave vs Global Mapper
- Chevin FleetWave vs GRASS GIS
- Chevin FleetWave vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Chevin FleetWave vs Trailforks
- Chevin FleetWave vs onX Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs Mapbox
- Chevin FleetWave vs Google Maps Platform
- Chevin FleetWave vs Leaflet
- Chevin FleetWave vs Bing Maps
- Chevin FleetWave vs Cesium ion
- Chevin FleetWave vs Citymapper
- Chevin FleetWave vs Gaia GPS
- Chevin FleetWave vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Samsara
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AssetWorks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geotab
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Verizon Connect
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Azuga
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Omnitracs
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Whip Around
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Fleet Complete
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CalAmp
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Uptake
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Motive
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Route4Me
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Lytx
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs NexTraq
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Quartix
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ridecell
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Webfleet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
