Maps · head to head
Bing Maps vs ArcGIS Field Maps

Bing Maps
Maps
Web mapping services with street maps, aerial imagery, and APIs for developers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bing Maps bing Maps for Enterprise is deprecated and will be retired by 6/30/2025 for free accounts and 6/30/2028 for enterprise accounts; ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- They diverge on capability: Bing Maps covers Core Functionality, ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bing Maps and ArcGIS Field Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Bing Maps | ArcGIS Field Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence |
| Platforms | Web | iOS, Android, Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bing Maps
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bing Maps
- Driving directions and turn-by-turn navigation guidancenot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Real-time traffic monitoring and road condition updatesnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Commuter route planning with live traffic intelligencenot ArcGIS Field Maps
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Bing Maps
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Bing Maps
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Bing Maps
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Bing Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bing Maps
- Bing Maps for Enterprise is deprecated and will be retired by 6/30/2025 for free accounts and 6/30/2028 for enterprise accounts
- All implementations must migrate to Azure Maps to avoid service disruption
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Pricing, plan by plan
Bing Maps
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Bing Maps review.
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Questions people ask
- Is Bing Maps or ArcGIS Field Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bing Maps starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bing Maps or ArcGIS Field Maps?
- Bing Maps starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request.
- Does Bing Maps or ArcGIS Field Maps run on more platforms?
- Bing Maps runs on Web. ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- What is Bing Maps best used for?
- Bing Maps is most often used for driving directions and turn-by-turn navigation guidance, real-time traffic monitoring and road condition updates, commuter route planning with live traffic intelligence. Of those, driving directions and turn-by-turn navigation guidance and real-time traffic monitoring and road condition updates are not what ArcGIS Field Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Bing Maps do that ArcGIS Field Maps cannot?
- Bing Maps covers Core Functionality, User Interface. ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bing Maps: What happened to Bing Maps for Enterprise?
Bing Maps for Enterprise is deprecated and will be retired. Free account customers can continue using the service until 6/30/2025, while enterprise account customers can continue until 6/30/2028. Microsoft recommends migrating implementations to Azure Maps to avoid service disruptions.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Bing Maps: When will Bing Maps for Enterprise be discontinued?
Bing Maps for Enterprise retires 6/30/2025 for free accounts and 6/30/2028 for enterprise accounts. All implementations using Bing Maps for Enterprise REST APIs and SDKs must be updated to use Azure Maps before the retirement dates.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Bing Maps: What should I use instead of Bing Maps?
Microsoft is transitioning customers to Azure Maps, which provides consumption-based pricing with volume-based discounts and pay-only-for-what-you-use cost structure. Azure Maps offers all mapping features without throttling.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- Bing Maps vs Mapbox
- Bing Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- Bing Maps vs HERE Technologies
- Bing Maps vs Apple Maps
- Bing Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Bing Maps vs Geoapify
- Bing Maps vs MapTiler
- Bing Maps vs Correlator3D
- Bing Maps vs Mapillary
- Bing Maps vs OpenRouteService
- Bing Maps vs Stadia Maps
- Bing Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- Bing Maps vs Navmii GPS
- Bing Maps vs Nominatim
- Bing Maps vs OpenLayers
- Bing Maps vs OpenStreetMap
- Bing Maps vs OsmAnd
- Bing Maps vs QGIS
- Bing Maps vs SW Maps
- Bing Maps vs Felt
- Bing Maps vs CARTO
- Bing Maps vs Global Mapper
- Bing Maps vs GRASS GIS
- Bing Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Bing Maps vs Trailforks
- Bing Maps vs onX Maps
- Bing Maps vs Leaflet
- Bing Maps vs Cesium ion
- Bing Maps vs Citymapper
- Bing Maps vs Gaia GPS
- Bing Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Apple Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geoapify
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs MapTiler
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Correlator3D
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapillary
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OpenRouteService
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Stadia Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Esri ArcGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Navmii GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Nominatim
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OpenLayers
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OpenStreetMap
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OsmAnd
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
