Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs Route4Me

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Route4Me
Fleet Management
Comprehensive route optimization platform designed for last-mile delivery, field sales, and service businesses
- From
- $199/month
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; Route4Me free mobile plan limited to 10 stops per route, restricting use for growing delivery operations
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Route4Me covers Core Functionality.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and Route4Me actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | Route4Me |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $199/month |
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | subscription |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
| Founded | Unknown | 2009 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in Route4Me
- Core Functionality
- User Interface
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Route4Me
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Route4Me
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Route4Me
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Route4Me
Route4Me
- Optimizing last-mile delivery routes to reduce per-stop fuel costsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Scheduling technician visits to maximize appointments per workdaynot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Coordinating timely medication deliveries to patients and pharmaciesnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Streamlining garbage collection routes across multiple residential areasnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Capturing signatures and photos as field service proof of deliverynot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Route4Me
- Free mobile plan limited to 10 stops per route, restricting use for growing delivery operations
- GPS tracking, SMS notifications, and avoidance zones are paid add-ons that significantly increase total cost beyond base plan pricing
- Customer support is slow or unresponsive with reported difficulty reaching support via phone and ticket channels
- Route optimization quality issues and navigation inaccuracies reported by users
- Limited integrations with third-party business systems beyond Zapier connections
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Route4Me
$199/month- Route Optimization$199/month
- Route planning and map editor
- Address book and mapping
- Territory management
- Business Optimization$299/month
- All Route Optimization features
- Optimization across multiple drivers, vehicles, and facilities
- Mixed fleet handling
- Enterprise Optimization$349/month
- All Business Optimization features
- Custom deployment for large fleets
- Remote and on-site professional services
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose Route4Me if
- You need core functionality.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want user interface.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or Route4Me better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Route4Me at $199/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or Route4Me?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Route4Me at $199/month.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or Route4Me run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Route4Me runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what Route4Me is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that Route4Me cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. Route4Me covers Core Functionality, User Interface.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Route4Me: Does Route4Me have a free tier and what are the limits?
Route4Me offers a free mobile plan limited to 10 stops per route. A 7-day free trial is available with unlimited stops and tasks for testing professional features, though this trial is no longer offered as of early 2026.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Route4Me: Can Route4Me work offline?
Yes. The iOS and Android driver mobile apps support offline mode. Once a route is opened while connected to the internet, the app will load it for offline access. When back online, the app automatically syncs offline data to the cloud.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
Route4Me: What integrations does Route4Me support?
Route4Me integrates with 8,000+ apps via Zapier, including Slack, Google Calendar, Notion, Salesforce, and ServiceM8. The platform also connects with ERP, CRM, OMS, and TMS systems.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Route4Me: What platforms does Route4Me support?
Route4Me is available on web (browser), iOS (14.0+), Android (9.0+), and desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux).
SourceRelated pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Fleet Complete
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Chevin FleetWave
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Samsara
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geotab
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Verizon Connect
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Motive
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Azuga
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Omnitracs
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Teletrac Navman
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AssetWorks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CalAmp
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GPS Trackit
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Whip Around
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Zonar Systems
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Lytx
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs NexTraq
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Quartix
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ridecell
- Route4Me vs QGIS
- Route4Me vs SW Maps
- Route4Me vs Felt
- Route4Me vs CARTO
- Route4Me vs Global Mapper
- Route4Me vs GRASS GIS
- Route4Me vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Route4Me vs Trailforks
- Route4Me vs onX Maps
- Route4Me vs Mapbox
- Route4Me vs Google Maps Platform
- Route4Me vs Leaflet
- Route4Me vs Bing Maps
- Route4Me vs Cesium ion
- Route4Me vs Citymapper
- Route4Me vs Gaia GPS
- Route4Me vs GraphHopper
- Route4Me vs Fleet Complete
- Route4Me vs Chevin FleetWave
- Route4Me vs Samsara
- Route4Me vs Geotab
- Route4Me vs Verizon Connect
- Route4Me vs Motive
- Route4Me vs Azuga
- Route4Me vs Omnitracs
- Route4Me vs Teletrac Navman
- Route4Me vs AssetWorks
- Route4Me vs CalAmp
- Route4Me vs GPS Trackit
- Route4Me vs Whip Around
- Route4Me vs Zonar Systems
- Route4Me vs Lytx
- Route4Me vs NexTraq
- Route4Me vs Quartix
- Route4Me vs Ridecell
