Maps · head to head
Citymapper vs ArcGIS Field Maps

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Citymapper has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Citymapper citymapper's own App Store listing states live transit and turn-by-turn features work only in a named list of specific cities (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and dozens of other listed cities), not globally, per the developer's own description.; ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- They diverge on capability: Citymapper covers Multi-modal routing, ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Citymapper and ArcGIS Field Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Citymapper | ArcGIS Field Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | freemium | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2011 | Unknown |
Identical on both: platforms (Ios, Android, Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Citymapper
- Multi-modal routing
- Real-time departures
- Live bus tracking
- Disruption alerts
- Walking directions
- Uber
- Lyft
- Lime
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Citymapper
- Daily commutingnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- City explorationnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Trip planningnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Mobility as a servicenot ArcGIS Field Maps
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Citymapper
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Citymapper
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Citymapper
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Citymapper
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Citymapper
- Citymapper's own App Store listing states live transit and turn-by-turn features work only in a named list of specific cities (New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and dozens of other listed cities), not globally, per the developer's own description.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Pricing, plan by plan
Citymapper
Free- FreeFree
- Multi-modal routing
- Real-time departures
- Basic navigation
- Citymapper Premium$4.99/month
- Live location sharing
- Weather integration
- Widgets
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Which should you pick?
Choose Citymapper if
- You need multi-modal routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Ios, Android, Web.
- You also want real-time departures.
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Questions people ask
- Is Citymapper or ArcGIS Field Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Citymapper starts at Free and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Citymapper or ArcGIS Field Maps?
- Citymapper has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Citymapper and On request for ArcGIS Field Maps.
- Does Citymapper or ArcGIS Field Maps run on more platforms?
- Citymapper runs on Ios, Android, Web. ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Citymapper for free?
- Yes. Citymapper has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request.
- What is Citymapper best used for?
- Citymapper is most often used for daily commuting, city exploration, trip planning, mobility as a service. Of those, daily commuting and city exploration are not what ArcGIS Field Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Citymapper do that ArcGIS Field Maps cannot?
- Citymapper covers Multi-modal routing, Real-time departures, Live bus tracking, Disruption alerts. ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Citymapper: Does Citymapper offer paid membership?
Yes, Citymapper offers a CLUB membership tier with exclusive features, including AI-powered route selection. However, specific pricing details for CLUB membership are not disclosed on their main website.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Citymapper: Where can I find Citymapper CLUB pricing?
Citymapper CLUB pricing is not published on their website. You would need to check the mobile app (Apple App Store or Google Play Store) or contact Citymapper support directly for current pricing information.
SourceArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- Citymapper vs Transit
- Citymapper vs Google Maps Platform
- Citymapper vs HERE Technologies
- Citymapper vs Apple Maps
- Citymapper vs Mapbox
- Citymapper vs Ride with GPS
- Citymapper vs Trailforks
- Citymapper vs AllTrails
- Citymapper vs onX Maps
- Citymapper vs Felt
- Citymapper vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- Citymapper vs TomTom
- Citymapper vs Waze
- Citymapper vs What3words
- Citymapper vs Google Maps
- Citymapper vs HERE WeGo
- Citymapper vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Citymapper vs QGIS
- Citymapper vs SW Maps
- Citymapper vs CARTO
- Citymapper vs Global Mapper
- Citymapper vs GRASS GIS
- Citymapper vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Citymapper vs Leaflet
- Citymapper vs Bing Maps
- Citymapper vs Cesium ion
- Citymapper vs Gaia GPS
- Citymapper vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Transit
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE Technologies
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Apple Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ride with GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AllTrails
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs TomTom
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Waze
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs What3words
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs HERE WeGo
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper

