Fleet Management · head to head
CalAmp vs ArcGIS Field Maps

CalAmp
Fleet Management
Fleet telematics hardware and software provider that went through Chapter 11 restructuring in 2024 and is now privately held by its former lender
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CalAmp the company underwent Chapter 11 restructuring and a change of ownership in 2024, and any multi-year contract should factor in the risk and uncertainty that follows a recent bankruptcy, even a fast one.; ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- They diverge on capability: CalAmp covers GPS tracking hardware, ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CalAmp and ArcGIS Field Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | CalAmp | ArcGIS Field Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | quote | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | iOS, Android, Web |
| Category | Fleet Management | Maps |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CalAmp
- GPS tracking hardware
- Telematics Cloud platform
- Driver behaviour monitoring
- Asset tracking
- Partner API access
- Diagnostic alerts
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CalAmp
- A software company or system integrator wanting telematics hardware and a data API to build a custom fleet application on top ofnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A fleet needing basic GPS tracking, driver behaviour and diagnostic alerting without a full BI-grade analytics suitenot ArcGIS Field Maps
- An asset-heavy operation needing non-powered trailer and equipment tracking alongside vehicle telematicsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A buyer specifically wanting a hardware-plus-cloud vendor rather than a software-only platform layered on third-party devicesnot ArcGIS Field Maps
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot CalAmp
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot CalAmp
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot CalAmp
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot CalAmp
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CalAmp
- The company underwent Chapter 11 restructuring and a change of ownership in 2024, and any multi-year contract should factor in the risk and uncertainty that follows a recent bankruptcy, even a fast one.
- Pricing is entirely unpublished and combines hardware and subscription costs, making direct comparison against software-only telematics competitors harder to do cleanly.
- It has historically leaned on a software partner ecosystem rather than a single polished end-user product, so the buying experience and interface quality vary depending on which partner application sits on top of CalAmp data.
- Newer, well-capitalised competitors such as Samsara and Motive have captured significant market share with more unified hardware-software products, and CalAmp market position has weakened relative to them.
- As a private company since 2024, financial transparency that public-market buyers previously had access to (quarterly filings, analyst coverage) is now reduced.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Pricing, plan by plan
CalAmp
On request- CalAmp Telematics Cloud$undefined/year
- Hardware and subscription priced together, no published rate
- Cost varies by device type, data plan and partner/direct sales channel
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Which should you pick?
Choose CalAmp if
- You need gps tracking hardware.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want telematics cloud platform.
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Questions people ask
- Is CalAmp or ArcGIS Field Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. CalAmp starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CalAmp or ArcGIS Field Maps?
- CalAmp starts at On request and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request.
- Does CalAmp or ArcGIS Field Maps run on more platforms?
- CalAmp runs on Web, iOS, Android. ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- What is CalAmp best used for?
- CalAmp is most often used for a software company or system integrator wanting telematics hardware and a data api to build a custom fleet application on top of, a fleet needing basic gps tracking, driver behaviour and diagnostic alerting without a full bi-grade analytics suite, an asset-heavy operation needing non-powered trailer and equipment tracking alongside vehicle telematics, a buyer specifically wanting a hardware-plus-cloud vendor rather than a software-only platform layered on third-party devices. Of those, a software company or system integrator wanting telematics hardware and a data api to build a custom fleet application on top of and a fleet needing basic gps tracking, driver behaviour and diagnostic alerting without a full bi-grade analytics suite are not what ArcGIS Field Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can CalAmp do that ArcGIS Field Maps cannot?
- CalAmp covers GPS tracking hardware, Telematics Cloud platform, Driver behaviour monitoring, Asset tracking. ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CalAmp: Is CalAmp still in business?
Yes. It completed a fast Chapter 11 restructuring in 2024, eliminating roughly $230 million in debt, and is now privately held by Lynrock Lake Master Fund LP.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
CalAmp: Does CalAmp sell directly to fleets or through partners?
Both, but a significant part of its business is providing hardware and data APIs to software partners who build the end-user fleet application.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
CalAmp: Is pricing published?
No. Hardware and subscription costs are combined and quoted, varying by device type, data plan and sales channel.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- CalAmp vs Motive
- CalAmp vs Samsara
- CalAmp vs Geotab
- CalAmp vs Fleet Complete
- CalAmp vs Quartix
- CalAmp vs Chevin FleetWave
- CalAmp vs GPS Trackit
- CalAmp vs Uptake
- CalAmp vs Verizon Connect
- CalAmp vs AssetWorks
- CalAmp vs Ridecell
- CalAmp vs Webfleet
- CalAmp vs Whip Around
- CalAmp vs Zonar Systems
- CalAmp vs Lytx
- CalAmp vs NexTraq
- CalAmp vs QGIS
- CalAmp vs SW Maps
- CalAmp vs Felt
- CalAmp vs CARTO
- CalAmp vs Global Mapper
- CalAmp vs GRASS GIS
- CalAmp vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- CalAmp vs Trailforks
- CalAmp vs onX Maps
- CalAmp vs Mapbox
- CalAmp vs Google Maps Platform
- CalAmp vs Leaflet
- CalAmp vs Bing Maps
- CalAmp vs Cesium ion
- CalAmp vs Citymapper
- CalAmp vs Gaia GPS
- CalAmp vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Motive
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Samsara
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geotab
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Fleet Complete
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Quartix
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Chevin FleetWave
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GPS Trackit
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Uptake
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Verizon Connect
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AssetWorks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ridecell
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Webfleet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Whip Around
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Zonar Systems
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Lytx
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs NexTraq
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
