Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs Quartix

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Quartix
Fleet Management
Deliberately narrow vehicle tracking from a listed UK vendor that publishes its prices
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; Quartix video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Quartix covers Live tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and Quartix actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | Quartix |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | Per vehicle per month |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in Quartix
- Live tracking
- Driving style scoring
- Timesheet reporting
- Geofences
- Driver identification
- Published pricing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Quartix
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Quartix
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Quartix
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Quartix
Quartix
- A UK or French van fleet that wants tracking and timesheet evidence without a discovery call and a three-year commitmentnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A finance manager who needs to compare telematics costs on published numbers rather than negotiated quotesnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- An operator disputing employee hours or customer claims about arrival times who needs a defensible site attendance recordnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A small fleet whose insurer offers a discount for driving style monitoring but who does not need cameras or compliance toolingnot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Quartix
- Video telematics is not part of the core product, so any fleet that decides it needs camera evidence after an incident has to bring in a second vendor and a second subscription.
- There is no maintenance, work order or parts management, so servicing schedules stay in whatever spreadsheet or garage system the fleet already runs.
- US hours of service and wider DOT compliance are not the focus, which rules Quartix out for regulated interstate commercial operations.
- The standard tracker is hardwired rather than a plug-in device, so installation means booking vehicles in, which adds cost and downtime that no-contract plug-in competitors avoid.
- The API and integration list are short, so feeding tracking data into payroll, job costing or an ERP tends to mean scheduled exports rather than a supported connector.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Quartix
On request- Quartix$undefined/month
- List pricing published openly, with rates varying by contract length
- Tracking hardware included in the subscription rather than bought separately
- One-year terms available alongside longer discounted options
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose Quartix if
- You need live tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want driving style scoring.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or Quartix better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Quartix at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or Quartix?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Quartix at On request.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or Quartix run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Quartix runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what Quartix is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that Quartix cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. Quartix covers Live tracking, Driving style scoring, Timesheet reporting, Geofences.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Quartix: Why is Quartix cheaper than the big platforms?
Because it does less. There is no camera ecosystem, no compliance suite and no marketplace to fund. If you only need tracking, you are not subsidising features you will not use.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Quartix: Do I have to sign for three years?
No. Shorter terms are offered, priced higher per month than the longer options. The rates are published, so the trade-off is visible before you talk to anyone.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
Quartix: Is the hardware mine?
The tracking unit is supplied as part of the subscription rather than sold to you. Check the return and replacement terms if you plan to leave or dispose of vehicles.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geotab
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Verizon Connect
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Azuga
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CalAmp
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GPS Trackit
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs NexTraq
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Motive
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Lytx
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Whip Around
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Zonar Systems
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Samsara
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Omnitracs
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ridecell
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Uptake
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Webfleet
- Quartix vs QGIS
- Quartix vs SW Maps
- Quartix vs Felt
- Quartix vs CARTO
- Quartix vs Global Mapper
- Quartix vs GRASS GIS
- Quartix vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Quartix vs Trailforks
- Quartix vs onX Maps
- Quartix vs Mapbox
- Quartix vs Google Maps Platform
- Quartix vs Leaflet
- Quartix vs Bing Maps
- Quartix vs Cesium ion
- Quartix vs Citymapper
- Quartix vs Gaia GPS
- Quartix vs GraphHopper
- Quartix vs Geotab
- Quartix vs Verizon Connect
- Quartix vs Azuga
- Quartix vs CalAmp
- Quartix vs GPS Trackit
- Quartix vs NexTraq
- Quartix vs Motive
- Quartix vs Lytx
- Quartix vs Whip Around
- Quartix vs Zonar Systems
- Quartix vs Samsara
- Quartix vs Omnitracs
- Quartix vs Ridecell
- Quartix vs Uptake
- Quartix vs Webfleet
