Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs NexTraq

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

NexTraq
Fleet Management
US small-fleet telematics now absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; NexTraq the NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and NexTraq actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | NexTraq |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | quote |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in NexTraq
- Vehicle tracking
- Hours of service
- Fuel and idling reporting
- Maintenance scheduling
- Job dispatch
- Driver scorecards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot NexTraq
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot NexTraq
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot NexTraq
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot NexTraq
NexTraq
- A North American trades or field service fleet that wants tracking, dispatch and ELD compliance from one mid-market vendornot ArcGIS Field Maps
- An operator already buying Michelin tyres and fleet services that can negotiate telematics into a wider commercial agreementnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A fleet replacing an ageing tracking system that values an owner with a large corporate balance sheet over a venture-funded challengernot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A distribution business needing straightforward fuel and idling reporting to justify a driver behaviour programmenot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
NexTraq
- The NexTraq brand has been absorbed into Michelin Connected Fleet, so the product name, the account team and eventually the platform underneath you are all subject to a consolidation plan you have no say in.
- Michelin is merging three separately engineered telematics products, which historically means feature freezes on the older platforms and a migration that existing customers pay for in disruption rather than cash.
- The feature set is mid-market and unexceptional, so it rarely wins a technical evaluation against Geotab or Samsara on capability alone.
- Contracts bundle hardware into multi-year terms, so a fleet that shrinks or is acquired continues paying for devices, and early exit triggers hardware recovery costs.
- The integration ecosystem is small and the API is not a selling point, so connecting telematics data to job costing or payroll usually means custom work or scheduled file exports.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
NexTraq
On request- NexTraq$undefined/year
- Per vehicle subscription with hardware bundled into the term
- Multi-year agreements are standard
- ELD and dispatch modules priced as tiers
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose NexTraq if
- You need vehicle tracking.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want hours of service.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or NexTraq better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and NexTraq at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or NexTraq?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and NexTraq at On request.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or NexTraq run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. NexTraq runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what NexTraq is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that NexTraq cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. NexTraq covers Vehicle tracking, Hours of service, Fuel and idling reporting, Maintenance scheduling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
NexTraq: Is NexTraq still a separate company?
No. Michelin bought it in 2017 and has folded it into Michelin Connected Fleet, together with Masternaut in Europe and Sascar in Brazil.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
NexTraq: Will my NexTraq system be migrated to a different platform?
Assume so, eventually. Ask directly what the migration timetable is, what happens to historical data, and who bears the cost of re-fitting or re-configuring devices.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
NexTraq: Does buying Michelin tyres get me a better telematics price?
It is worth testing. The commercial logic of the acquisition is bundling vehicle services, and that is where discounting is most likely to be available.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geotab
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Verizon Connect
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Azuga
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Samsara
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Motive
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GPS Trackit
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Fleet Complete
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Quartix
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Zonar Systems
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AssetWorks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Lytx
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ridecell
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Uptake
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Webfleet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Whip Around
- NexTraq vs QGIS
- NexTraq vs SW Maps
- NexTraq vs Felt
- NexTraq vs CARTO
- NexTraq vs Global Mapper
- NexTraq vs GRASS GIS
- NexTraq vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- NexTraq vs Trailforks
- NexTraq vs onX Maps
- NexTraq vs Mapbox
- NexTraq vs Google Maps Platform
- NexTraq vs Leaflet
- NexTraq vs Bing Maps
- NexTraq vs Cesium ion
- NexTraq vs Citymapper
- NexTraq vs Gaia GPS
- NexTraq vs GraphHopper
- NexTraq vs Geotab
- NexTraq vs Verizon Connect
- NexTraq vs Azuga
- NexTraq vs Samsara
- NexTraq vs Motive
- NexTraq vs GPS Trackit
- NexTraq vs Fleet Complete
- NexTraq vs Quartix
- NexTraq vs Zonar Systems
- NexTraq vs AssetWorks
- NexTraq vs Lytx
- NexTraq vs Ridecell
- NexTraq vs Uptake
- NexTraq vs Webfleet
- NexTraq vs Whip Around
