Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs Motive

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Motive
Fleet Management
ELD compliance, AI dashcams and spend management for North American commercial fleets
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; Motive contracts are multi-year and per vehicle with hardware embedded, so a fleet that shrinks keeps paying for units that are sitting in a yard.
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Motive covers ELD compliance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and Motive actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | Motive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | quote |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Maps | Fleet Management |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in Motive
- ELD compliance
- AI dashcams
- GPS tracking
- Driver safety scoring
- Vehicle diagnostics
- Spend management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Motive
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Motive
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Motive
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Motive
Motive
- A trucking fleet that must run FMCSA compliant electronic logs and wants cameras from the same vendornot ArcGIS Field Maps
- An operator facing an insurance renewal that requires evidence of a driver coaching programmenot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A construction fleet tracking both vehicles and unpowered assets such as trailers and generatorsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A fleet suspecting fuel card misuse and wanting transactions matched against vehicle locationnot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Motive
- Contracts are multi-year and per vehicle with hardware embedded, so a fleet that shrinks keeps paying for units that are sitting in a yard.
- Driver facing cameras generate real workforce resistance, and fleets in tight labour markets have lost drivers over the rollout rather than the technology.
- Installation and calibration across a distributed fleet takes weeks of vehicle downtime, which is rarely costed into the comparison at the point of purchase.
- The rebrand from KeepTruckin means older documentation, integration guides and third-party references are inconsistent, which slows technical work on connections.
- Coverage depends on cellular networks, so remote route segments produce gaps in tracking and delayed log uploads that drivers then have to reconcile.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Motive
On request- Motive$undefined/year
- Per-vehicle subscription over a multi-year term
- Hardware supplied within the agreement rather than purchased outright
- Dashcams, asset trackers and spend management priced as separate lines
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose Motive if
- You need eld compliance.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want ai dashcams.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or Motive better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Motive at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or Motive?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and Motive at On request.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or Motive run on more platforms?
- ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web. Motive runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what Motive is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that Motive cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. Motive covers ELD compliance, AI dashcams, GPS tracking, Driver safety scoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Motive: Is Motive the same company as KeepTruckin?
Yes. KeepTruckin renamed to Motive in 2022. The products and account relationships carried over.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Motive: Can hardware be bought outright?
It is normally supplied inside a multi-year subscription rather than sold, which is why the exit cost of a shrinking fleet is high.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
Motive: Does it work outside the United States?
Canada and Mexico are supported, including Canadian electronic logging requirements. Coverage elsewhere is limited.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Motive: Are the driver facing cameras optional?
Yes, road facing only configurations are available, and fleets worried about driver retention often start there.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Lytx
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Samsara
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geotab
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CalAmp
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Verizon Connect
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Whip Around
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Omnitracs
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Fleet Complete
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Uptake
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Webfleet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GPS Trackit
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs NexTraq
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Quartix
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ridecell
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Zonar Systems
- Motive vs QGIS
- Motive vs SW Maps
- Motive vs Felt
- Motive vs CARTO
- Motive vs Global Mapper
- Motive vs GRASS GIS
- Motive vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Motive vs Trailforks
- Motive vs onX Maps
- Motive vs Mapbox
- Motive vs Google Maps Platform
- Motive vs Leaflet
- Motive vs Bing Maps
- Motive vs Cesium ion
- Motive vs Citymapper
- Motive vs Gaia GPS
- Motive vs GraphHopper
- Motive vs Lytx
- Motive vs Samsara
- Motive vs Geotab
- Motive vs CalAmp
- Motive vs Verizon Connect
- Motive vs Whip Around
- Motive vs Omnitracs
- Motive vs Fleet Complete
- Motive vs Uptake
- Motive vs Webfleet
- Motive vs GPS Trackit
- Motive vs NexTraq
- Motive vs Quartix
- Motive vs Ridecell
- Motive vs Zonar Systems
