Maps · head to head
Cesium ion vs ArcGIS Field Maps

Cesium ion
Maps
Hosted 3D geospatial tiling and streaming, metered by storage, streaming and gigapixels
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Cesium ion has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cesium ion streaming is metered in gigabytes a month, so a public-facing application's cost is driven by visitor traffic you do not control, and a successful launch can blow through a tier immediately.; ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- They diverge on capability: Cesium ion covers 3D Tiles tiling, ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cesium ion and ArcGIS Field Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cesium ion | ArcGIS Field Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per month by storage, streaming and gigapixels | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | iOS, Android, Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cesium ion
- 3D Tiles tiling
- Global terrain and imagery
- Google Photorealistic 3D Tiles
- Cloud reality modelling
- Streaming delivery
- Access tokens
- Geocoding
- Self-hosted option
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cesium ion
- A survey firm delivering a photogrammetry mesh to a client as a browser link rather than a 40 GB downloadnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A simulation team streaming global terrain and imagery into an Unreal Engine environmentnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- An urban planning department publishing a city model that planners can inspect without desktop GIS softwarenot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A software product embedding 3D geospatial views and needing hosted tiling rather than building a tilernot ArcGIS Field Maps
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot Cesium ion
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot Cesium ion
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot Cesium ion
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot Cesium ion
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cesium ion
- Streaming is metered in gigabytes a month, so a public-facing application's cost is driven by visitor traffic you do not control, and a successful launch can blow through a tier immediately.
- Reality modelling is billed in gigapixels a month, an unfamiliar unit that makes it hard to estimate in advance how many drone flights a plan will actually cover.
- The free Community tier is restricted to non-commercial or open use, so a consultancy sharing a model with a paying client does not qualify regardless of how small the dataset is.
- Team accounts cost substantially more than individual ones at the same quota, $524 against $149 on Commercial, so adding a second colleague is a large step rather than an incremental seat charge.
- Self-hosting is available only under a custom enterprise agreement, which leaves organisations with data residency or air-gap requirements out of the published tiers entirely.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
Pricing, plan by plan
Cesium ion
Free- CommunityFree
- 5 GB storage
- 15 GB per month streaming
- 20 gigapixels per month reality modelling
- Commercial$149/month
- 50 GB storage
- 150 GB per month streaming
- 40 gigapixels per month reality modelling
- Premium$499/month
- 250 GB storage
- 500 GB per month streaming
- 100 gigapixels per month reality modelling
- Custom$undefined/year
- Negotiated quotas
- Self-hosted deployment in your own environment
- Enterprise support
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
Which should you pick?
Choose Cesium ion if
- You need 3d tiles tiling.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want global terrain and imagery.
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Questions people ask
- Is Cesium ion or ArcGIS Field Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cesium ion starts at Free and ArcGIS Field Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cesium ion or ArcGIS Field Maps?
- Cesium ion has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Cesium ion and On request for ArcGIS Field Maps.
- Does Cesium ion or ArcGIS Field Maps run on more platforms?
- Cesium ion runs on Web, Cloud. ArcGIS Field Maps runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Cesium ion for free?
- Yes. Cesium ion has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request.
- What is Cesium ion best used for?
- Cesium ion is most often used for a survey firm delivering a photogrammetry mesh to a client as a browser link rather than a 40 gb download, a simulation team streaming global terrain and imagery into an unreal engine environment, an urban planning department publishing a city model that planners can inspect without desktop gis software, a software product embedding 3d geospatial views and needing hosted tiling rather than building a tiler. Of those, a survey firm delivering a photogrammetry mesh to a client as a browser link rather than a 40 gb download and a simulation team streaming global terrain and imagery into an unreal engine environment are not what ArcGIS Field Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can Cesium ion do that ArcGIS Field Maps cannot?
- Cesium ion covers 3D Tiles tiling, Global terrain and imagery, Google Photorealistic 3D Tiles, Cloud reality modelling. ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cesium ion: How is Cesium ion priced?
By several meters at once: storage in gigabytes, streaming in gigabytes per month, and reality modelling in gigapixels per month. Commercial starts at $149 a month for an individual.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
Cesium ion: Is the free tier usable commercially?
No. Community is for non-commercial or open use. Commercial work needs a paid plan.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
Cesium ion: Can I run ion on my own infrastructure?
Only under a custom enterprise agreement negotiated with Cesium.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
Cesium ion: Do I need Cesium ion to use CesiumJS?
No. CesiumJS is open source and free. ion provides hosted tiling, base layers and streaming that you would otherwise have to build.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- Cesium ion vs Mapbox
- Cesium ion vs CesiumJS
- Cesium ion vs MapTiler
- Cesium ion vs Fused
- Cesium ion vs Agisoft Metashape
- Cesium ion vs Correlator3D
- Cesium ion vs Global Mapper
- Cesium ion vs Kepler.gl
- Cesium ion vs Trailforks
- Cesium ion vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- Cesium ion vs QGIS
- Cesium ion vs deck.gl
- Cesium ion vs OSRM
- Cesium ion vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- Cesium ion vs PositionStack
- Cesium ion vs Radar
- Cesium ion vs SAGA GIS
- Cesium ion vs Stadia Maps
- Cesium ion vs SW Maps
- Cesium ion vs Felt
- Cesium ion vs CARTO
- Cesium ion vs GRASS GIS
- Cesium ion vs onX Maps
- Cesium ion vs Google Maps Platform
- Cesium ion vs Leaflet
- Cesium ion vs Bing Maps
- Cesium ion vs Citymapper
- Cesium ion vs Gaia GPS
- Cesium ion vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CesiumJS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs MapTiler
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Fused
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Correlator3D
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Kepler.gl
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs deck.gl
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs OSRM
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Polaris Navigation GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs PositionStack
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Radar
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SAGA GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Stadia Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
