Maps · head to head
ArcGIS Field Maps vs onX Maps

ArcGIS Field Maps
Maps
Esri field data collection that cannot be bought on its own, only with an ArcGIS user type
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

onX Maps
Maps
Land ownership and offline navigation apps sold as separate subscriptions per activity: Hunt, Offroad, Backcountry
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArcGIS Field Maps field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money; onX Maps hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- They diverge on capability: ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArcGIS Field Maps and onX Maps actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArcGIS Field Maps | onX Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Included with an ArcGIS user type licence | Separate per-product subscriptions, per user per year |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), platforms (iOS, Android, Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArcGIS Field Maps
- Offline map areas
- Smart forms
- High-accuracy GNSS
- Location sharing
- Assignment dispatch
- Indoor positioning
- Direct editing of authoritative data
Only in onX Maps
- Land ownership boundaries
- Offline maps
- Waypoint and track marking
- Elite tier private land data
- 3D terrain view
- Weather overlay
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- A water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office GIS runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keysnot onX Maps
- A county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync laternot onX Maps
- An environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external GNSS receiver recorded directly against the authoritative datasetnot onX Maps
- An organisation consolidating from Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce onto a single app after Esri retired themnot onX Maps
onX Maps
- A hunter who needs to know exact private and public land boundaries before crossing onto a propertynot ArcGIS Field Maps
- An off-road driver planning a trail route with land ownership and access datanot ArcGIS Field Maps
- A backcountry skier or hiker wanting offline terrain maps without cell signalnot ArcGIS Field Maps
- Someone who does two or more of these activities and needs to budget for two or three separate subscriptionsnot ArcGIS Field Maps
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArcGIS Field Maps
- Field Maps has no price of its own, so a project budget built from the product page misses the Creator seats, the Mobile Worker seats and the ArcGIS Online credits or Enterprise infrastructure that actually cost money
- It only works against Esri feature services, so an organisation whose data is in PostGIS or a database without an ArcGIS layer must publish through Esri first, which is a platform decision rather than an app choice
- Named user licensing means occasional or seasonal field staff still consume a full annual seat, and organisations with a large pool of infrequent collectors pay for capacity they use a few weeks a year
- As a forms tool alone it is more rigid and more expensive than dedicated mobile forms products, so its value collapses if you are not already committed to ArcGIS
- The consolidation of four apps into one changed established workflows, and organisations that had built processes around Collector or Workforce have had to rework them on Esri's timetable rather than their own
onX Maps
- Hunt, Offroad and Backcountry are entirely separate subscriptions, so a user needing more than one activity pays for more than one product with no combined bundle discount.
- Elite-tier pricing at roughly $99.99 a year per product is expensive if a buyer only occasionally needs the private land ownership data it adds.
- The apps are US and Canada focused, with more limited usefulness for international travel compared to a global mapping product.
- Land ownership data, while extensive, can lag real-world changes in property boundaries in fast-changing areas.
- It is not a general-purpose hiking or trail-review app in the way AllTrails or Gaia GPS are, so casual hikers without a land-boundary need may find the focus narrower than expected.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArcGIS Field Maps
On request- Mobile Worker user type$undefined/year
- Field editing in Field Maps included with no additional purchase
- Cannot author maps; requires a Creator seat elsewhere in the organisation
- Priced per named user per year
- Creator user type$undefined/year
- Required to author and publish the maps that field workers use
- At least one Creator needed before Field Maps can be deployed
- Includes Field Maps editing as well as authoring
- ArcGIS Enterprise deployment$undefined/year
- Field Maps against self-hosted ArcGIS Enterprise instead of ArcGIS Online
- Server licensing and infrastructure priced separately
- Quoted through Esri or a distributor
onX Maps
On request- onX Hunt Elite$99.99/year
- Nationwide private land ownership data
- Recent satellite imagery
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Premium$34.99/year
- Trail and land ownership maps for off-road use
- Offline maps
- onX Offroad Elite$99.99/year
- Everything in Premium plus nationwide land ownership and recent imagery
- onX Backcountry$29.99/year
- Backcountry ski and hike focused maps
- Offline maps
- Avalanche and terrain data
Which should you pick?
Choose ArcGIS Field Maps if
- You need offline map areas.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want smart forms.
Choose onX Maps if
- You need land ownership boundaries.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want offline maps.
Questions people ask
- Is ArcGIS Field Maps or onX Maps better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and onX Maps at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArcGIS Field Maps or onX Maps?
- ArcGIS Field Maps starts at On request and onX Maps at On request.
- Does ArcGIS Field Maps or onX Maps run on more platforms?
- Both run on iOS, Android, Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is ArcGIS Field Maps best used for?
- ArcGIS Field Maps is most often used for a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys, a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later, an environmental team needing sub-metre positions from an external gnss receiver recorded directly against the authoritative dataset, an organisation consolidating from collector, explorer, tracker and workforce onto a single app after esri retired them. Of those, a water utility whose inspectors update the same asset feature service the office gis runs on, rather than filling in forms that someone re-keys and a county carrying out a sign inventory where crews work in areas without mobile coverage and need offline maps that sync later are not what onX Maps is typically brought in for.
- What can ArcGIS Field Maps do that onX Maps cannot?
- ArcGIS Field Maps covers Offline map areas, Smart forms, High-accuracy GNSS, Location sharing. onX Maps covers Land ownership boundaries, Offline maps, Waypoint and track marking, Elite tier private land data.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can I buy Field Maps on its own?
No. It is included with the Mobile Worker, Creator and GIS Professional user types, and you need at least one Creator in the organisation to author maps.
onX Maps: Can I use one onX subscription for both hunting and off-roading?
No, onX Hunt, onX Offroad and onX Backcountry are separate apps with separate subscriptions.
ArcGIS Field Maps: What replaced Collector and Workforce?
Field Maps. Esri merged Collector, Explorer, Tracker and Workforce into it and retired the separate apps.
onX Maps: What does the Elite tier add?
Elite tiers add nationwide private land ownership data, more recent satellite imagery and partner discounts on top of the base Premium tier.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Does it work offline?
Yes. Map areas are downloaded in advance and edits synchronise when connectivity returns.
onX Maps: Does onX work outside the US?
Coverage is strongest in the US and Canada; usefulness elsewhere is limited.
ArcGIS Field Maps: Can it write to a non-Esri database?
Not directly. The data must be published as an ArcGIS feature service, which may sit over an enterprise geodatabase you already run.
Related pages
More on ArcGIS Field Maps
Other head to heads
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs QGIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs SW Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Felt
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs CARTO
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Global Mapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GRASS GIS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Trailforks
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Mapbox
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Leaflet
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Bing Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Cesium ion
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Citymapper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Gaia GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs GraphHopper
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs AllTrails
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Ride with GPS
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Google Maps
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs TomTom
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Transit
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs Waze
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs What3words
- ArcGIS Field Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
- onX Maps vs QGIS
- onX Maps vs SW Maps
- onX Maps vs Felt
- onX Maps vs CARTO
- onX Maps vs Global Mapper
- onX Maps vs GRASS GIS
- onX Maps vs Foursquare Spatial Studio
- onX Maps vs Trailforks
- onX Maps vs Mapbox
- onX Maps vs Google Maps Platform
- onX Maps vs Leaflet
- onX Maps vs Bing Maps
- onX Maps vs Cesium ion
- onX Maps vs Citymapper
- onX Maps vs Gaia GPS
- onX Maps vs GraphHopper
- onX Maps vs AllTrails
- onX Maps vs Ride with GPS
- onX Maps vs Google Maps
- onX Maps vs Geographic Calculator
- onX Maps vs ArcGIS Survey123
- onX Maps vs Agisoft Metashape
- onX Maps vs Sygic GPS Navigation
- onX Maps vs TomTom
- onX Maps vs Transit
- onX Maps vs Waze
- onX Maps vs What3words
- onX Maps vs TomTom Developer Portal
