Customer Support · head to head
Level AI vs Lusha

Level AI
Customer Support
AI quality assurance and agent assist for mid-market and enterprise contact centres
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Only Lusha has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Level AI pricing combines a per-agent fee, a platform licence and usage-based components, so the number quoted per agent is not the number you pay and budgets set from a per-seat figure alone come in short.; Lusha teams over 5 users must contact sales for configuration; no published per-user limits for standard plans
- They diverge on capability: Level AI covers Automated QA scoring, Lusha covers Contact database.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Level AI and Lusha actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Level AI
- Automated QA scoring
- Semantic intent search
- Agent assist
- Coaching workflows
- Custom scorecards
- Voice of customer analytics
- Dispute and calibration
- CCaaS integrations
Only in Lusha
- Contact database
- Email search
- Company intelligence
- Email verification
- Chrome extension
- Integrations
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Level AI
- A 400-seat support organisation reviewing 2 per cent of calls manually and wanting compliance coverage across the whole volume without adding QA headcountnot Lusha
- A regulated financial services contact centre that must evidence disclosure wording on every recorded call rather than on a samplenot Lusha
- A support operation onboarding a new outsourced site and needing week-one visibility into how the vendor agents actually handle contactsnot Lusha
- A CX team trying to work out why average handle time rose 20 per cent by clustering contact drivers across a quarter of interactionsnot Lusha
Lusha
- Lead generationnot Level AI
- Contact researchnot Level AI
- Email verificationnot Level AI
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Level AI
- Pricing combines a per-agent fee, a platform licence and usage-based components, so the number quoted per agent is not the number you pay and budgets set from a per-seat figure alone come in short.
- Integration to each contact centre or CRM system is charged as a separate implementation fee, which means a team running voice on one platform and chat on another pays twice before a single interaction is scored.
- The unit economics do not work below roughly a hundred agents; smaller teams get quoted enterprise minimums that cost more than the QA analyst they were trying to avoid hiring.
- Automated scores are only as good as the scorecard behind them, and the calibration work to get semantic questions scoring consistently falls on your QA team over several weeks before anyone trusts the output.
- Transcription and semantic accuracy degrade on heavily accented speech, poor telephony audio and languages outside the main supported set, so multilingual operations often end up running manual QA in parallel for some queues anyway.
Lusha
- Teams over 5 users must contact sales for configuration; no published per-user limits for standard plans
- Unused credits on monthly plans roll over but cap at twice the monthly limit, creating potential waste
- Annual plans do not roll over unused credits; they reset at cycle end
Pricing, plan by plan
Level AI
On request- Level AI$undefined/year
- Automated QA on all interactions
- Custom scorecards
- Semantic search
Lusha
Free- FreeFree
- 40 credits per month
- Basic prospecting features
- Browser extension
- Starter$49.9/month
- 400 credits per month
- All Free plan features
- Professional$69.9/month
- 600 credits per month
- All Starter features
- Premium$399.9/month
- 3,400 credits per month
- All Professional features
Which should you pick?
Choose Level AI if
- You need automated qa scoring.
- You also want semantic intent search.
Choose Lusha if
- You need contact database.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want email search.
Questions people ask
- Is Level AI or Lusha better?
- Neither clearly leads. Level AI starts at On request and Lusha at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Level AI or Lusha?
- Lusha has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Level AI and Free for Lusha.
- Does Level AI or Lusha run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Lusha for free?
- Yes. Lusha has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Level AI starts at On request.
- What is Level AI best used for?
- Level AI is most often used for a 400-seat support organisation reviewing 2 per cent of calls manually and wanting compliance coverage across the whole volume without adding qa headcount, a regulated financial services contact centre that must evidence disclosure wording on every recorded call rather than on a sample, a support operation onboarding a new outsourced site and needing week-one visibility into how the vendor agents actually handle contacts, a cx team trying to work out why average handle time rose 20 per cent by clustering contact drivers across a quarter of interactions. Of those, a 400-seat support organisation reviewing 2 per cent of calls manually and wanting compliance coverage across the whole volume without adding qa headcount and a regulated financial services contact centre that must evidence disclosure wording on every recorded call rather than on a sample are not what Lusha is typically brought in for.
- What can Level AI do that Lusha cannot?
- Level AI covers Automated QA scoring, Semantic intent search, Agent assist, Coaching workflows. Lusha covers Contact database, Email search, Company intelligence, Email verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Level AI: Does Level AI publish pricing?
No. Quotes are built per deployment from agent count, channel mix and product modules, and integration fees are added on top.
Lusha: What does Lusha's Free plan include?
Lusha's Free plan provides 40 credits per month at no cost. It includes basic prospecting features, browser extension access, and CRM integrations. Credits are used for email reveals (1 credit per contact) and phone numbers (10 credits per contact).
SourceLevel AI: Can it replace our QA analysts?
It replaces the sampling and scoring work, not the judgement. Teams typically keep analysts for calibration, disputes and coaching design.
Lusha: How do Lusha credits work and what is the credit rollover policy?
Lusha uses a credit system where email reveals cost 1 credit and phone reveals cost 10 credits per contact. On monthly plans, unused credits roll over and accumulate up to twice your monthly credit limit. Annual plans reset unused credits at the cycle's end without rollover.
SourceLevel AI: Does it work without a cloud contact centre platform?
It needs recordings and metadata from somewhere. If your telephony does not expose those through an integration or API, this is not a fit.
Lusha: What is the annual pricing for Lusha plans?
Lusha offers annual pricing at a discount: Starter is $449.10/year (4,800 credits annually), Professional is $587.16/year (7,200 credits), and Premium is $3,119.21/year (40,800 credits). Annual plans are cheaper per credit than monthly but do not roll over unused credits.
SourceLevel AI: How long does implementation take?
Expect weeks, not days. Connecting systems is quick; getting scorecards calibrated to the point where team leaders act on the scores takes longer.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Level AI vs Klaus
- Level AI vs Observe.AI
- Level AI vs Balto
- Level AI vs Cresta
- Level AI vs Calabrio ONE
- Level AI vs Kapture CX
- Level AI vs Playvox
- Level AI vs Verint
- Level AI vs Ameyo
- Level AI vs Assembled
- Level AI vs Richpanel
- Level AI vs LiveAgent
- Level AI vs Jira Service Management
- Level AI vs Plain
- Level AI vs Salesforce Service Cloud
- Level AI vs Sprinklr Service
- Level AI vs Zoho Desk
- Level AI vs Seamless.AI
- Level AI vs Gong
- Level AI vs Outreach
- Level AI vs Pipedrive
- Level AI vs Seismic
- Level AI vs Clearbit
- Level AI vs UpLead
- Level AI vs Apollo.io
- Level AI vs Affinity
- Level AI vs Capsule CRM
- Level AI vs Cloze
- Level AI vs Daylite
- Level AI vs SharpSpring
- Level AI vs SoftSync AI
- Level AI vs Solid Performers
- Level AI vs SuiteCRM
- Level AI vs Teamleader
- Level AI vs Twenty
- Lusha vs Klaus
- Lusha vs Observe.AI
- Lusha vs Balto
- Lusha vs Cresta
- Lusha vs Calabrio ONE
- Lusha vs Kapture CX
- Lusha vs Playvox
- Lusha vs Verint
- Lusha vs Ameyo
- Lusha vs Assembled
- Lusha vs Richpanel
- Lusha vs LiveAgent
- Lusha vs Jira Service Management
- Lusha vs Plain
- Lusha vs Salesforce Service Cloud
- Lusha vs Sprinklr Service
- Lusha vs Zoho Desk
- Lusha vs Seamless.AI
- Lusha vs Gong
- Lusha vs Outreach
- Lusha vs Pipedrive
- Lusha vs Seismic
- Lusha vs Clearbit
- Lusha vs UpLead
- Lusha vs Apollo.io
- Lusha vs Affinity
- Lusha vs Capsule CRM
- Lusha vs Cloze
- Lusha vs Daylite
- Lusha vs SharpSpring
- Lusha vs SoftSync AI
- Lusha vs Solid Performers
- Lusha vs SuiteCRM
- Lusha vs Teamleader
- Lusha vs Twenty

