Technology · head to head
Close vs Eclipse

Close
Technology
The inside sales CRM of choice for startups & SMBs
- From
- $9/month
- Rated
- -

Eclipse
Technology
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Eclipse has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Close hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription); Eclipse high memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed
- They diverge on capability: Close covers Built-in calling, Eclipse covers Java development environment.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Close and Eclipse actually diverge.
Identical on both: pricing model (Unknown), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Technology).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Close
- Built-in calling
- Email automation
- SMS messaging
- Pipeline management
- Lead management
- Activity tracking
- Reporting
- Mobile app
Only in Eclipse
- Java development environment
- Extensible plugin architecture
- Integrated debugger
- Code refactoring
- Version control integration
- Build automation
- Multi-language support
- Rich client platform
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Close
- Inside salesnot Eclipse
- Outbound salesnot Eclipse
- Lead managementnot Eclipse
- Sales engagementnot Eclipse
- Pipeline trackingnot Eclipse
Eclipse
- Java application developmentnot Close
- Enterprise software developmentnot Close
- Web application developmentnot Close
- Plugin developmentnot Close
- Educational programmingnot Close
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Close
- Hidden costs beyond subscription: calling charges (~$0.02/minute), SMS usage fees, phone numbers ($1-5/month), AI call assistant ($50/month + $0.02/min transcription)
- No built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment; must source leads separately
- Limited marketing automation compared to competitors like HubSpot; lacks lead scoring and nurturing campaigns
- Calling cost at scale can double effective monthly cost for high-volume SDR teams making 50+ calls per day
- Limited customization of data model compared to Salesforce; cannot create fully custom objects or complex relationships
Eclipse
- High memory consumption and CPU usage, especially with multiple plugins installed
- Slow startup times and performance degradation with large projects or many open editors
- Requires configuration of eclipse.ini file to optimize heap sizes for adequate performance
- User interface considered outdated compared to modern IDE alternatives
- User base fell from 39% of Java developers in 2024 to 28% in 2025, indicating market decline
Pricing, plan by plan
Close
$9/month- Solo$9/month (annual)
- 1 user only
- 10,000 leads max
- Calling, email, SMS
- Essentials$35/month (annual)
- Unlimited contacts
- Team collaboration
- 1,000 AI credits/month
- Growth$99/month (annual)
- Automation workflows
- Power dialer
- Bulk email
- Scale$139/month (annual)
- Role-based permissions
- Predictive dialer
- Unlimited recording
Eclipse
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Eclipse review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Close if
- You need built-in calling.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want email automation.
Choose Eclipse if
- You need java development environment.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want extensible plugin architecture.
Questions people ask
- Is Close or Eclipse better?
- Neither clearly leads. Close starts at $9/month and Eclipse at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Close or Eclipse?
- Eclipse has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $9/month for Close and Free for Eclipse.
- Does Close or Eclipse run on more platforms?
- Close runs on Web, iOS, Android. Eclipse runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use Eclipse for free?
- Yes. Eclipse has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Close starts at $9/month.
- What is Close best used for?
- Close is most often used for inside sales, outbound sales, lead management, sales engagement. Of those, inside sales and outbound sales are not what Eclipse is typically brought in for.
- What can Close do that Eclipse cannot?
- Close covers Built-in calling, Email automation, SMS messaging, Pipeline management. Eclipse covers Java development environment, Extensible plugin architecture, Integrated debugger, Code refactoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Close: What are Close's pricing plans and what do they include?
Close offers four plans: Solo ($9-19/user/month), Essentials ($35-49), Growth ($99-109), and Scale ($139-149). All include calling, email, SMS, and Chloe AI agent access. Essentials adds unlimited contacts and team collaboration. Growth adds automation, power dialer, and custom activities. Scale adds role-based permissions and unlimited recording. Annual billing saves up to 50%.
SourceEclipse: How much does Eclipse IDE cost?
Eclipse IDE is completely free and open-source, released under the Eclipse Public License 2.0.
SourceClose: What are the hidden costs in Close's pricing beyond the subscription?
Close charges usage-based fees for calling (~$0.02 per minute), SMS charges per message, and phone number rentals ($1-5/month). The AI Call Assistant add-on costs $50/month plus $0.02 per minute for transcription. Heavy outbound calling teams can see their total costs increase 30-50% beyond the base seat price.
SourceClose: What is Chloe, Close's AI sales agent, and what can it do?
Chloe is an AI sales agent built into Close that automatically calls leads, qualifies prospects through real conversations, and can book meetings while updating the CRM automatically. Chloe features AI-generated call summaries, transcripts, and action items automatically logged to contacts.
SourceClose: Does Close include lead lists, data enrichment, or contact information?
No. Close does not provide built-in lead lists, company intelligence, or contact enrichment features. Organizations must source leads separately or use third-party data providers. This differs from platforms like HubSpot which include integrated lead databases.
SourceClose: What communication features does Close include?
Close includes built-in calling with automatic call logging, email templates and bulk email capabilities, SMS messaging with tracking and automation, email syncing with Gmail, and automated follow-up workflows. All communication happens within the CRM platform.
SourceClose: Does Close have marketing automation capabilities?
Close's marketing automation features are limited compared to HubSpot. It includes basic email sequences, task reminders, and workflow automation, but lacks advanced lead scoring, nurturing campaigns, and detailed marketing analytics. Organizations requiring extensive marketing automation need separate tools.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Close vs Attio
- Close vs Drift
- Close vs Asana
- Close vs Docker
- Close vs Mozilla Firefox
- Close vs Userpilot
- Close vs Personetics
- Close vs Superhuman
- Close vs ClickUp
- Close vs Linear
- Close vs Notion
- Close vs Amplitude
- Close vs Jenkins
- Close vs Miro
- Close vs Plane
- Close vs Postman
- Close vs Raycast
- Close vs GitHub
- Close vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Close vs Postgres
- Close vs Storybook
- Close vs Okta
- Close vs Kubernetes
- Close vs PostHog
- Close vs Jira
- Close vs LogRocket
- Close vs Neovim
- Close vs UptimeRobot
- Close vs Vercel
- Close vs Zeta
- Close vs PyCharm
- Close vs WebStorm
- Eclipse vs Attio
- Eclipse vs Drift
- Eclipse vs Asana
- Eclipse vs Docker
- Eclipse vs Mozilla Firefox
- Eclipse vs Userpilot
- Eclipse vs Personetics
- Eclipse vs Superhuman
- Eclipse vs ClickUp
- Eclipse vs Linear
- Eclipse vs Notion
- Eclipse vs Amplitude
- Eclipse vs Jenkins
- Eclipse vs Miro
- Eclipse vs Plane
- Eclipse vs Postman
- Eclipse vs Raycast
- Eclipse vs GitHub
- Eclipse vs JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- Eclipse vs Postgres
- Eclipse vs Storybook
- Eclipse vs Okta
- Eclipse vs Kubernetes
- Eclipse vs PostHog
- Eclipse vs Jira
- Eclipse vs LogRocket
- Eclipse vs Neovim
- Eclipse vs UptimeRobot
- Eclipse vs Vercel
- Eclipse vs Zeta
- Eclipse vs PyCharm
- Eclipse vs WebStorm
