Accounting · head to head
Fyle vs SAP Concur

Fyle
Accounting
Real-time expense management that works with your cards
- From
- $11.99/month per active user
- Rated
- -

SAP Concur
Accounting
Enterprise travel booking, expense claims and supplier invoice processing sold as separate modules
- From
- $29/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Fyle billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill; SAP Concur implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.
- They diverge on capability: Fyle covers Real-time card tracking, SAP Concur covers Expense capture.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Fyle and SAP Concur actually diverge.
| Attribute | Fyle | SAP Concur |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $11.99/month per active user | $29/month |
| Founded | 2016 | 1993 |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Ios, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Accounting).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Fyle
- Real-time card tracking
- Automatic receipt matching
- Expense policies
- Approval workflows
- Mileage tracking
- QuickBooks
- Xero
- Sage Intacct
Only in SAP Concur
- Expense capture
- Corporate card feeds
- Policy engine
- Approval routing
- Travel booking
- Travel agency integration
- Duty of care
- Invoice capture
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Fyle
- Expense reporting and corporate card reconciliationnot SAP Concur
- Enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursementnot SAP Concur
SAP Concur
- A multinational with thousands of travellers where an audit committee has asked for evidence that travel policy is actually enforcednot Fyle
- An organisation replacing spreadsheet expense claims and email approvals that cannot survive an external auditnot Fyle
- A finance team trying to eliminate duplicate claims by matching corporate card feeds against submitted receiptsnot Fyle
- A shared service centre processing high volumes of supplier invoices that needs capture and approval routing before postingnot Fyle
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Fyle
- Billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill
- The Growth plan carries a 5 user minimum and the Business plan a 10 user minimum, so the entry cost is set by the floor rather than the team
- API access and the Sage Intacct and NetSuite integrations require a paid tier
- ACH reimbursements and project expense tracking sit above the entry plan
- Both published plans are billed annually
- Enterprise pricing is custom and aimed at organisations with 250 or more employees
SAP Concur
- Implementation is done through SAP or a partner and commonly costs a substantial multiple of the first year subscription, because the value sits entirely in the configured policy, approval hierarchy and ledger mapping rather than in the software as shipped.
- Pricing is driven by transaction volume, expense reports and invoices processed, rather than by seats, so a business with seasonal travel or a growth year sees the bill move in ways headcount based budgeting does not predict.
- The configuration that makes it valuable is also what makes it rigid, and organisations frequently find that changing an approval chain or adding a cost centre dimension requires a partner change order rather than an administrator's afternoon.
- Contracts are typically multi year with limited exit, so an organisation that concludes after twelve months that a lighter expense tool would have been enough is still paying for the heavier one for the remainder of the term.
- The three modules are licensed separately and the strongest case for the product depends on having travel, expense and card feeds together, so buying expense alone gives you a costly receipt system without the control loop that justifies the price.
Pricing, plan by plan
Fyle
$11.99/month per active user- Growth$11.99/month per active user
- Minimum 5 users
- Unlimited expense tracking, receipt scanning
- Card integrations, mileage/per diem tracking
- Business$14.99/month per active user
- Minimum 10 users
- Multi-stage approvals, ACH reimbursements (US only)
- Project tracking, Sage Intacct/300 CRE integrations
- Enterprise$null/mo
- 250+ employees
- IP whitelisting, SSO options
- Branded accounts, dedicated account manager
SAP Concur
$29/month- Professional$8/month
- Expense reporting
- Receipt capture
- Approvals
- Premium$12/month
- Travel booking
- Invoice management
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose Fyle if
- You need real-time card tracking.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want automatic receipt matching.
Choose SAP Concur if
- You need expense capture.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want corporate card feeds.
Questions people ask
- Is Fyle or SAP Concur better?
- Neither clearly leads. Fyle starts at $11.99/month per active user and SAP Concur at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Fyle or SAP Concur?
- Fyle starts at $11.99/month per active user and SAP Concur at $29/month.
- Does Fyle or SAP Concur run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Ios, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Fyle best used for?
- Fyle is most often used for expense reporting and corporate card reconciliation, enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursement. Of those, expense reporting and corporate card reconciliation and enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursement are not what SAP Concur is typically brought in for.
- What can Fyle do that SAP Concur cannot?
- Fyle covers Real-time card tracking, Automatic receipt matching, Expense policies, Approval workflows. SAP Concur covers Expense capture, Corporate card feeds, Policy engine, Approval routing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Fyle: How does Fyle define and charge for active users?
An 'active user' is defined as an employee who creates at least one expense or has a credit card connected with active transactions monthly. You only pay for active users, not all onboarded employees.
SourceSAP Concur: Do we need SAP ERP to use Concur?
No. It integrates with SAP systems particularly well but it is regularly deployed alongside Oracle, NetSuite, Workday and other ledgers. The integration work is a line item in the implementation either way.
Fyle: What is Fyle's Growth plan pricing?
The Growth plan costs $11.99 per active user per month (billed annually) with a minimum of 5 users. Includes unlimited expense tracking, receipt scanning, and single-stage approvals.
SourceSAP Concur: Is it worth it for a company of a hundred people?
Usually not. Below a few hundred travellers the implementation cost and the contract commitment are hard to justify against lighter expense tools. The case turns on policy enforcement and audit, not on receipt scanning.
Fyle: What features does Fyle's Business plan add?
The Business plan costs $14.99 per active user per month (minimum 10 users, annual billing) and adds multi-stage approvals, project tracking, ACH reimbursements (US only), and premium support.
SourceSAP Concur: How is it priced?
Broadly on the volume of expense reports and invoices processed, with the modules licensed separately. Because pricing is quoted rather than published, get the volume assumptions written into the contract and check what happens when you exceed them.
SAP Concur: Can it handle multiple countries and currencies?
Yes, that is one of its stronger areas, including per country tax treatment and VAT reclaim identification. Confirm coverage for your specific countries during the sales process rather than assuming global means every jurisdiction.
SAP Concur: How long does implementation take?
Plan in months, not weeks, for anything beyond a single entity with simple approvals. Multi entity rollouts with travel and invoice modules commonly run across a year in phases.
SAP Concur: What does the audit service actually do?
It has a team review a sample or all of your submitted claims against receipts and policy before approval, which some organisations use in place of internal reviewers. It is priced separately from the expense subscription.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Fyle vs Ramp
- Fyle vs Airbase
- Fyle vs Happay
- Fyle vs Expensify
- Fyle vs Rydoo
- Fyle vs Zoho Expense
- Fyle vs QuickBooks
- Fyle vs Melio
- Fyle vs Spendesk
- Fyle vs Divvy
- Fyle vs Brex
- Fyle vs Pleo
- Fyle vs Money Forward Cloud
- Fyle vs Moneybird
- Fyle vs MYOB
- Fyle vs Netvisor
- Fyle vs Ottimate
- Fyle vs Pennylane
- Fyle vs Medius Expense
- Fyle vs Circula
- Fyle vs Fortnox
- Fyle vs FreeAgent
- Fyle vs freee
- Fyle vs insightsoftware
- Fyle vs IRIS KashFlow
- SAP Concur vs Ramp
- SAP Concur vs Airbase
- SAP Concur vs Happay
- SAP Concur vs Expensify
- SAP Concur vs Rydoo
- SAP Concur vs Zoho Expense
- SAP Concur vs QuickBooks
- SAP Concur vs Melio
- SAP Concur vs Spendesk
- SAP Concur vs Divvy
- SAP Concur vs Brex
- SAP Concur vs Pleo
- SAP Concur vs Money Forward Cloud
- SAP Concur vs Moneybird
- SAP Concur vs MYOB
- SAP Concur vs Netvisor
- SAP Concur vs Ottimate
- SAP Concur vs Pennylane
- SAP Concur vs Medius Expense
- SAP Concur vs Circula
- SAP Concur vs Fortnox
- SAP Concur vs FreeAgent
- SAP Concur vs freee
- SAP Concur vs insightsoftware
- SAP Concur vs IRIS KashFlow
