Softwr

Software · head to head

Fortnox vs Fyle

Fortnox logo

Fortnox

Software

Swedish cloud accounting and business platform for bookkeeping, invoicing and payroll

From
On request
Rated
-
Fyle logo

Fyle

Software

Real-time expense management that works with your cards

From
$29/month
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Fortnox corporate packages alone span at least 7 named tiers (Mini through Stor+) priced from 209 kr/man to 919 kr/man, and add-on programs are billed separately per module (SEK); Fyle billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Fortnox and Fyle actually diverge.

Attributes where Fortnox and Fyle differ
AttributeFortnoxFyle
Starting priceOn request$29/month
PlatformsWebWeb, Ios, Android
FoundedUnknown2016

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Fortnox

Nothing recorded that Fyle does not also cover.

Only in Fyle

  • Real-time card tracking
  • Automatic receipt matching
  • Expense policies
  • Approval workflows
  • Mileage tracking
  • QuickBooks
  • Xero
  • Sage Intacct

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Fortnox

No use cases recorded yet. See the Fortnox review.

Fyle

  • Expense reporting and corporate card reconciliationnot Fortnox
  • Enforcing spend policy and approvals before reimbursementnot Fortnox

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Fortnox

  • Corporate packages alone span at least 7 named tiers (Mini through Stor+) priced from 209 kr/man to 919 kr/man, and add-on programs are billed separately per module (SEK)
  • The Fortnox Access verification tier is priced by transaction volume, rising from 9 kr/man at zero verifications to 199 kr/man at 1000+ verifications (SEK), so cost is not fixed and scales with usage

Fyle

  • Billed per active user, defined as anyone who creates an expense or has a connected card with transactions in the month, so headcount does not predict the bill
  • The Growth plan carries a 5 user minimum and the Business plan a 10 user minimum, so the entry cost is set by the floor rather than the team
  • API access and the Sage Intacct and NetSuite integrations require a paid tier
  • ACH reimbursements and project expense tracking sit above the entry plan
  • Both published plans are billed annually
  • Enterprise pricing is custom and aimed at organisations with 250 or more employees

Pricing, plan by plan

Fortnox

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Fortnox review.

Fyle

$29/month
  • Standard$8/month
    • Real-time card feeds
    • Receipt matching
    • Basic approvals
  • Business$12/month
    • Advanced policies
    • Custom workflows
    • Analytics
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • Unlimited users
    • API access
    • Priority support

Which should you pick?

Choose Fortnox if

Nothing in the data separates Fortnox from Fyle on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose Fyle if

  • You need real-time card tracking.
  • You work on Web, Ios, Android.
  • You also want automatic receipt matching.

Questions people ask

Is Fortnox or Fyle better?
Neither clearly leads. Fortnox starts at On request and Fyle at $29/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Fortnox or Fyle?
Fortnox starts at On request and Fyle at $29/month.
Does Fortnox or Fyle run on more platforms?
Fortnox runs on Web. Fyle runs on Web, Ios, Android.
What can Fortnox do that Fyle cannot?
Fyle covers Real-time card tracking, Automatic receipt matching, Expense policies, Approval workflows.

Related pages

Other head to heads