Sales Enablement · head to head
Dock vs Endgame

Dock
Sales Enablement
Client-facing workspaces for deal rooms, onboarding plans and customer portals
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Endgame
Sales Enablement
A context graph over CRM, calls and documents that answers account questions with citations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Dock has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Dock the free plan excludes Salesforce and HubSpot integration, which is the capability that turns Dock from a nicer file share into a sales tool, so the free tier does not let you evaluate the thing you would actually buy.; Endgame there is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
- They diverge on capability: Dock covers Digital sales rooms, Endgame covers Context graph.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Dock and Endgame actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Sales Enablement).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Dock
- Digital sales rooms
- Mutual action plans
- Onboarding hubs
- Content library
- Order forms
- Engagement tracking
- AI document generation
- CRM sync
Only in Endgame
- Context graph
- Cited answers
- Account research briefs
- Meeting and call prep
- Deal inspection
- Stakeholder mapping
- Executive and QBR briefings
- MCP server
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Dock
- A sales team replacing scattered Drive links and follow-up emails with one tracked workspace per opportunitynot Endgame
- An account executive running a mutual action plan with a buying committee that needs shared visibility of dates and ownersnot Endgame
- A customer success team carrying the same workspace from signed deal into onboarding without rebuilding itnot Endgame
- A revenue leader wanting evidence of whether buyers actually opened the material sent after a demonot Endgame
Endgame
- An enterprise sales team on Salesforce and Gong whose account research is done manually before every meeting and takes an hour a rep a day.not Dock
- A revenue organisation that has standardised on Claude or ChatGPT internally and wants those assistants grounded in real CRM and call data instead of hallucinating account history.not Dock
- A sales leadership team preparing quarterly business reviews from data spread across Salesforce, Snowflake, Gong and Notion.not Dock
- A new account executive inheriting a territory who needs the history of thirty accounts, including who was involved and what was promised, without reading two years of call recordings.not Dock
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Dock
- The free plan excludes Salesforce and HubSpot integration, which is the capability that turns Dock from a nicer file share into a sales tool, so the free tier does not let you evaluate the thing you would actually buy.
- Branding and layout customisation is the most common complaint from users; teams with strict design standards find workspaces they cannot make match the rest of their buyer-facing material.
- Workspaces render poorly on mobile, which matters because executive stakeholders in a buying committee frequently open a shared link on a phone first and form their impression there.
- Premium requires annual billing at 1,000 US dollars a month, so the step from Standard is a twelve-thousand dollar commitment rather than an incremental monthly upgrade, and it is triggered by asset limits as often as by seat count.
- The HubSpot integration is reported as noticeably weaker than the Salesforce one, so HubSpot-based teams get less of the CRM automation that justifies the paid tiers.
Endgame
- There is no pricing page at all; the URL returns a 404, so every engagement is a sales-led negotiation with no public benchmark and no way to scope budget before committing time.
- The product has pivoted twice, from product-led sales signals to account intelligence to a GTM context graph, on a Series B raised in February 2022 with no publicly reported round since, which is real roadmap and data model risk on a multi-year contract.
- Value depends heavily on Salesforce and Gong depth, so organisations on HubSpot or a different call recorder get a substantially thinner graph and a weaker product for the same negotiation.
- Positioning as a context layer under other AI tools makes return on investment hard to attribute, because no user logs in and no workflow visibly belongs to it, which makes renewal conversations difficult to defend internally.
- Vendor-published performance claims around accuracy, speed and cost reduction have no third-party benchmark behind them, and the independent review profile has been effectively inactive for over a year, so there is no current corpus to validate against.
- As a layer rather than an application it is structurally exposed to Salesforce or Gong shipping equivalent native context, which would remove the reason to keep paying for it without any action on the vendor’s part.
Pricing, plan by plan
Dock
Free- FreeFree
- 5 users
- 10 workspaces
- 25 content assets
- Standard$350/month
- 10 users included
- Unlimited workspaces
- 100 content assets
- Premium$1000/month
- 25 or more users, billed annually
- Unlimited assets, playbooks, courses and order forms
- CRM-integrated order forms
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- API access
- Custom domain and sending addresses
- SCIM provisioning
Endgame
On request- Endgame$undefined/year
- Context graph across CRM, calls, documents and email
- Slack, Teams, web and CLI access
- MCP server for external assistants
Which should you pick?
Choose Dock if
- You need digital sales rooms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want mutual action plans.
Questions people ask
- Is Dock or Endgame better?
- Neither clearly leads. Dock starts at Free and Endgame at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Dock or Endgame?
- Dock has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Dock and On request for Endgame.
- Does Dock or Endgame run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Dock for free?
- Yes. Dock has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Endgame starts at On request.
- What is Dock best used for?
- Dock is most often used for a sales team replacing scattered drive links and follow-up emails with one tracked workspace per opportunity, an account executive running a mutual action plan with a buying committee that needs shared visibility of dates and owners, a customer success team carrying the same workspace from signed deal into onboarding without rebuilding it, a revenue leader wanting evidence of whether buyers actually opened the material sent after a demo. Of those, a sales team replacing scattered drive links and follow-up emails with one tracked workspace per opportunity and an account executive running a mutual action plan with a buying committee that needs shared visibility of dates and owners are not what Endgame is typically brought in for.
- What can Dock do that Endgame cannot?
- Dock covers Digital sales rooms, Mutual action plans, Onboarding hubs, Content library. Endgame covers Context graph, Cited answers, Account research briefs, Meeting and call prep.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Dock: Do buyers and clients need a licence?
No. External collaborators are free on every plan, including Free.
Endgame: Is this the Endgame that Elastic acquired?
No. That was an endpoint security company. This is Endgame, Inc. at endgame.io, an account intelligence and context platform for revenue teams.
Dock: Is Dock useful without a CRM integration?
Much less so, and the free plan has none. Budget for Standard if you want activity flowing back to Salesforce or HubSpot.
Endgame: Is it still the product-led sales signals tool?
No. It pivoted twice. If your shortlist came from 2021 to 2023 coverage of PQL scoring, the product you would buy today is different.
Dock: Can it handle post-sale onboarding as well as deals?
Yes, that is one of its stronger arguments: the same workspace carries from deal to implementation without rebuilding it.
Endgame: What does it cost?
Unpublished. There is no pricing page. Expect an enterprise annual contract negotiated per deal.
Dock: Is pricing per seat?
Partly. Plans bundle a user count and additional seats are 50 US dollars a month each on top.
Endgame: Do I need Salesforce and Gong?
Not strictly, but the graph is built around them. On HubSpot or with another call recorder you get materially less value for the same price.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Dock vs Highspot
- Dock vs Showpad
- Dock vs Qwilr
- Dock vs Trumpet
- Dock vs Aligned
- Dock vs Arrows
- Dock vs Brainshark
- Dock vs Proposify
- Dock vs Potion
- Dock vs Salesloft
- Dock vs RevenueHero
- Dock vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Dock vs Twain
- Dock vs Warmly
- Dock vs Webex
- Dock vs Bigtincan
- Dock vs 6sense
- Dock vs Attention
- Dock vs Claap
- Dock vs Avoma
- Dock vs Mediafly
- Dock vs People.ai
- Dock vs Common Room
- Dock vs Klue
- Dock vs Cognism
- Dock vs ConnectAndSell
- Dock vs Default
- Endgame vs Highspot
- Endgame vs Showpad
- Endgame vs Qwilr
- Endgame vs Trumpet
- Endgame vs Aligned
- Endgame vs Arrows
- Endgame vs Brainshark
- Endgame vs Proposify
- Endgame vs Potion
- Endgame vs Salesloft
- Endgame vs RevenueHero
- Endgame vs Salesforce Commerce Cloud
- Endgame vs Twain
- Endgame vs Warmly
- Endgame vs Webex
- Endgame vs Bigtincan
- Endgame vs 6sense
- Endgame vs Attention
- Endgame vs Claap
- Endgame vs Avoma
- Endgame vs Mediafly
- Endgame vs People.ai
- Endgame vs Common Room
- Endgame vs Klue
- Endgame vs Cognism
- Endgame vs ConnectAndSell
- Endgame vs Default
