Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Integromat

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Integromat has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Integromat the free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Integromat covers Visual workflow builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Integromat actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cyclr | Integromat |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1595/month | Free |
| Pricing model | Per month by API call volume | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: platforms (Web, API), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Integromat
- Visual workflow builder
- Webhooks
- Data transformation
- Error handling
- Conditional logic
- Scheduling
- Team collaboration
- 1000+ apps
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Integromat
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Integromat
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Integromat
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Integromat
Integromat
- workflow automationnot Cyclr
- integration between appsnot Cyclr
- task automationnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Integromat
- The free plan enforces a 15 minute minimum interval between runs, so nothing near real time is possible without paying
- Free is limited to 2 active scenarios, a 5 MB file size and 7 days of execution logs
- Billing is per credit where each module action counts as one, so a scenario with many steps consumes credits far faster than its run count suggests
- Make API access requires a paid plan
- Priority execution and full text log search are Pro features
- Overage protection is Enterprise only, so cheaper plans can run up charges
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Integromat
Free- FreeFree
- 1000 credits monthly
- basic workflow builder
- access to 3000+ apps
- Core$9/month
- 10k credits
- unlimited active scenarios
- scheduled scenarios down to the minute
- Pro$16/month
- 10k credits
- priority execution
- custom variables
- Teams$29/month
- 10k credits
- team collaboration
- team roles
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Integromat if
- You need visual workflow builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want webhooks.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Integromat better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Integromat at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Integromat?
- Integromat has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Integromat.
- Does Cyclr or Integromat run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Integromat runs on Web, Api.
- Can I use Integromat for free?
- Yes. Integromat has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Integromat is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Integromat cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Integromat covers Visual workflow builder, Webhooks, Data transformation, Error handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Integromat: What is the free tier for Make?
Make's free tier provides 1,000 credits monthly, access to 3,000+ apps, a basic no-code workflow builder, and a 15-minute minimum interval between scenario runs.
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Integromat: Can I save money with annual billing on Make?
Yes, Make offers 15% or more savings when paying annually instead of monthly billing.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Integromat: How does Make's credit system work?
Each module action in Make consumes credits, with most basic actions using one credit per execution. Credits expire monthly for monthly plans or annually for yearly subscriptions.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs n8n
- Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Cyclr vs Xano
- Cyclr vs Pipedream
- Cyclr vs Automate.io
- Cyclr vs Parabola
- Cyclr vs Nintex
- Cyclr vs Flowise
- Cyclr vs HighLevel
- Cyclr vs Grouparoo
- Cyclr vs Hevo Data
- Cyclr vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Cyclr vs Salesforce Flows
- Integromat vs Tray.io
- Integromat vs Celigo
- Integromat vs Workato
- Integromat vs Alloy Automation
- Integromat vs Paragon
- Integromat vs Nango
- Integromat vs Merge
- Integromat vs Hatchet
- Integromat vs Zapier
- Integromat vs MuleSoft
- Integromat vs Dagster
- Integromat vs Fivetran
- Integromat vs Informatica
- Integromat vs jBPM
- Integromat vs Kogito
- Integromat vs Letta
- Integromat vs Lytics
- Integromat vs n8n
- Integromat vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Integromat vs Xano
- Integromat vs Pipedream
- Integromat vs Automate.io
- Integromat vs Parabola
- Integromat vs Nintex
- Integromat vs Flowise
- Integromat vs HighLevel
- Integromat vs Grouparoo
- Integromat vs Hevo Data
- Integromat vs HighByte Intelligence Hub
- Integromat vs Salesforce Flows

