Automation Integration · head to head
Cyclr vs Hevo Data

Cyclr
Automation Integration
Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
- From
- $1595/month
- Rated
- -

Hevo Data
Automation Integration
The easiest way to move data reliably
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Hevo Data has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Cyclr entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.; Hevo Data billed on events ingested rather than on connectors or seats, so the bill tracks how chatty the sources are
- They diverge on capability: Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Hevo Data covers No-code pipeline builder.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cyclr and Hevo Data actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Automation Integration).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cyclr
- White-label integration UI
- Connector library
- Workflow builder
- Custom connectors
- Regional hosting
- MCP server offering
- Usage metering
- Templates
Only in Hevo Data
- No-code pipeline builder
- Real-time sync
- Data validation
- Error handling
- Monitoring
- Data transformation
- Scheduling
- 150+ sources
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cyclr
- A mid-market SaaS vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a CRM integration it has not builtnot Hevo Data
- A product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectorsnot Hevo Data
- A European software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the EU for procurement reasonsnot Hevo Data
- A vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connectornot Hevo Data
Hevo Data
- Data pipeline and ETL managementnot Cyclr
- Cloud data integrationnot Cyclr
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cyclr
- Entry pricing of 1,595 US dollars a month for one connector and 100,000 API calls means small vendors will find building two or three integrations in-house genuinely cheaper, and Cyclr only pays off past a certain integration count.
- Connectors and API calls are metered separately, so a successful integration marketplace pushes you up tiers as your customers adopt it, meaning the cost rises with usage rather than with the revenue that usage generates.
- Custom connectors to APIs outside the library are your work to build and maintain, so the promise of not building integrations only holds for applications Cyclr already covers.
- Debugging is harder when the integration runs in a third-party runtime, because your support team sees a failed workflow rather than an HTTP response and has to escalate to Cyclr for anything non-obvious.
- Deep embedding creates real switching cost: your customers' live integrations run on Cyclr, so migrating later means recreating every customer workflow, which in practice means you rarely leave.
Hevo Data
- Billed on events ingested rather than on connectors or seats, so the bill tracks how chatty the sources are
- The free plan allows 1M events a month and the Starter plan starts at $265 a month billed annually
- Event volume is a priced tier inside each plan, at 5M, 20M or 50M on Starter
- Usage above the plan quota is charged as on demand on top of the subscription, and the overage rate is not published anywhere on the pricing page
- Paying monthly rather than annually raises Starter from $265 to $299
Pricing, plan by plan
Cyclr
$1595/month- PAYG$1595/month
- 100,000 API calls included
- 1 connector included
- Unlimited integrations and users
- Growth$2595/month
- 1,000,000 API calls included
- 10 connectors included
- Everything in PAYG
- Scale$7195/month
- 5,000,000 API calls included
- Unlimited connectors
- Everything in Growth
- Private Cloud$undefined/month
- Dedicated hosting in US, UK or EU
- Configurable processing and runtime
- Quoted pricing
Hevo Data
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 1M events/month
- 1-hour scheduling
- Up to 5 users
- Starter$265/month
- 5M-20M events/month options
- Up to 10 users
- 150+ connectors
- Professional$750/month
- 20M-100M events/month options
- Unlimited users
- Hevo APIs
- Business Critical$null/month
- Custom quote required
- Streaming pipelines
- Role-based access control
Which should you pick?
Choose Cyclr if
- You need white-label integration ui.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want connector library.
Choose Hevo Data if
- You need no-code pipeline builder.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want real-time sync.
Questions people ask
- Is Cyclr or Hevo Data better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cyclr starts at $1595/month and Hevo Data at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cyclr or Hevo Data?
- Hevo Data has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1595/month for Cyclr and Free for Hevo Data.
- Does Cyclr or Hevo Data run on more platforms?
- Cyclr runs on Web, API. Hevo Data runs on Web, Cloud.
- Can I use Hevo Data for free?
- Yes. Hevo Data has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Cyclr starts at $1595/month.
- What is Cyclr best used for?
- Cyclr is most often used for a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built, a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors, a european software company that needs its customers' integration data processed inside the eu for procurement reasons, a vendor whose customers each want a slightly different variation of the same integration and cannot be served by one hard-coded connector. Of those, a mid-market saas vendor losing deals because prospects ask for a crm integration it has not built and a product team that would rather ship an integration marketplace this quarter than hire two engineers to maintain connectors are not what Hevo Data is typically brought in for.
- What can Cyclr do that Hevo Data cannot?
- Cyclr covers White-label integration UI, Connector library, Workflow builder, Custom connectors. Hevo Data covers No-code pipeline builder, Real-time sync, Data validation, Error handling.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cyclr: What does Cyclr actually cost?
Published tiers start at 1,595 US dollars per month for 100,000 API calls and one connector, rising to 7,195 for unlimited connectors and five million calls.
Hevo Data: How much does Hevo Data cost?
Hevo Data offers a free plan (up to 1M events/month) and paid plans starting at $265/month (Starter for 5M-20M events/month) up to $750/month (Professional for 20M-100M events/month).
SourceCyclr: Do my customers know they are using Cyclr?
No. The interface is white-labelled to appear as part of your product.
Hevo Data: How are Hevo Data events counted?
Each record inserted, updated, or deleted in the destination counts as one event toward the monthly quota.
SourceCyclr: Can I host it in the EU or UK?
Yes, on the private cloud tiers, which matters for European procurement requirements.
Hevo Data: Does Hevo Data offer annual discounts?
Yes, Hevo Data offers 12% discount for annual billing on all paid plans.
SourceCyclr: What if the connector I need does not exist?
You build a custom connector using Cyclr tooling, which is work you own rather than work the platform removes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cyclr vs Tray.io
- Cyclr vs Celigo
- Cyclr vs Workato
- Cyclr vs Alloy Automation
- Cyclr vs Paragon
- Cyclr vs Nango
- Cyclr vs Merge
- Cyclr vs Hatchet
- Cyclr vs Zapier
- Cyclr vs MuleSoft
- Cyclr vs Dagster
- Cyclr vs Fivetran
- Cyclr vs Informatica
- Cyclr vs Integromat
- Cyclr vs jBPM
- Cyclr vs Kogito
- Cyclr vs Letta
- Cyclr vs Lytics
- Cyclr vs n8n
- Cyclr vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Cyclr vs Airbyte
- Cyclr vs Stitch
- Cyclr vs Talend
- Cyclr vs Polytomic
- Cyclr vs Decodable
- Cyclr vs Hightouch
- Cyclr vs Mage AI
- Cyclr vs mParticle
- Cyclr vs Nintex
- Cyclr vs UiPath
- Hevo Data vs Tray.io
- Hevo Data vs Celigo
- Hevo Data vs Workato
- Hevo Data vs Alloy Automation
- Hevo Data vs Paragon
- Hevo Data vs Nango
- Hevo Data vs Merge
- Hevo Data vs Hatchet
- Hevo Data vs Zapier
- Hevo Data vs MuleSoft
- Hevo Data vs Dagster
- Hevo Data vs Fivetran
- Hevo Data vs Informatica
- Hevo Data vs Integromat
- Hevo Data vs jBPM
- Hevo Data vs Kogito
- Hevo Data vs Letta
- Hevo Data vs Lytics
- Hevo Data vs n8n
- Hevo Data vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Hevo Data vs Airbyte
- Hevo Data vs Stitch
- Hevo Data vs Talend
- Hevo Data vs Polytomic
- Hevo Data vs Decodable
- Hevo Data vs Hightouch
- Hevo Data vs Mage AI
- Hevo Data vs mParticle
- Hevo Data vs Nintex
- Hevo Data vs UiPath
